Equity Crowdfunding: Factors Influencing the Performance of Firm in Malaysia

This study aims to investigate the factors that influence the performance of the firms funded by equity crowdfunding after the campaign ended successfully. The factors investigated are the top management team (TMT), social networks and the platform provider (PP). Not many studies discuss on the related variables on ECF ecosystem in Malaysia. As such, this study adopts conceptual research approach by examining and analysing previous literatures on the topic. This study will answer the following questions; i) How TMT, social networks and platform provider influence the performance of the ECF funded firm. The findings indicate that under crowdfunding ecosystem, the characteristics of the founder and TMT play an important roles to attract the investors’ attention. They form a strategic human assets in the firm. This implicitly signals the firm’s values and reduce the asymmetry information. The values upsurge with the social traits among their networks. The networks can be among other those with more funding capability to inject more money when requested by the entrepreneur. Investors in crowfunding scenario invest based on closeness and trustworthiness. Thus, ECF funded firm with promising human capital, networks capital generated internally and externally as well as well known platform provider plus the workable business plan able to attract financial capital from investors when needed. The emergence of ECF fund and other new emergence financing instruments have evolved the entrepreneurial landscape worldwide. Moreover, these funding are unique as they can be tailored according to the firm funding objective. Nowadays, these type of funding have been widely used in real estate, agricultural and health industries too. The revolution in financial industry known as fintech is a plus to crowdfunding ecosystem. Despite of disrupting the traditional banking and financial institutions, crowdfunding provides opportunities to potential ventures with scarce capital resources. The uniqueness of this research is that previous studies yet to discuss how PP moderates the effect of founder, TMT and networks towards the ECF funded firm performance.


Types of Crowdfunding
Basically there four familiar types; donation, reward, equity and peer lending. However, the types of crowdfunding could evolve as it could be tailored according to the funding need of the entrepreneur (Mayorova & Petrenko, 2018).

Donation-based Crowdfunding
Historically, crowdfunding started with the donation model (Meyskens & Bird, 2015;Mollick, 2014). The main aim of donation crowdfunding is to collect money. Though sounding ordinary, what makes it different from the common donation is the interference of online mechanism (Kraus et al., 2016). Under this model, the donors participate because of the social value that triggers their spirit to invest and not for any material returns. This is the reason why social enterprises are familiar with the donation model where the core social value is most important rather than the reward or return (Kraus et al., 2016;Lehner, 2013). Hence, when the project is high in social value but low in economic value, the most suitable crowdfunding model is donation type. That is the reason why most charities and non-profit organisations prefer to engage with the donation model, and it has been proven that when it comes to social causes, events, or campaigns, people tend to act fast (Swart & Milner, 2015). A study by Shepherd and Patzelt (2011) discovered that funding success in crowdfunding is influenced by the entrepreneur's orientation. An entrepreneur with a sustainability orientation that focused on social purposes' projects concerning the community, natural life care, and protection of Mother Nature has more chances to success in the crowdfunding campaign. This is because the gain arises from the venture with sustainability orientation taking account of individuals, the economy, and society economically and non-economically. As a consequence, the success factor in the donation model is an eye opener to some donors who may subsequently think that some appreciation would be nice and eventually develop rewards-based crowdfunding as another type of crowdfunding.

Reward-based Crowdfunding
In this model, participating donors will be given a reward that matches the donation they have made in the crowdfunding event. The reward can be in the form of thanking mail, printed name on a t-shirt, or the donor's name in the project acknowledgment book (Hemer, 2011). There is also 'preselling' in which priority is given to the investor or 'early customer' who contributes to the preproduction of the product (Frydrych et al., 2014;Mollick, 2014). The nature of the investment serves both parties, the entrepreneur and the investors, where the entrepreneur receives the money for his/her product at the pre-order stage, and the investors have a chance to receive either material or immaterial rewards for the investments they make (Kraus et al., 2016). The purpose of the reward is not only to appreciate the investors' participation, but is also meant to encourage them to continue participation in the project (Swart & Milner, 2015). However, the entrepreneur's sustainability orientation still plays an important role to ensure the target funding success. According to Calic and Mosakowski (2016), the entrepreneur's sustainability orientation and target funding success have a positive impact, as investors' motivation shifts from monetary returns to other forms of returns. Next is equity-based crowdfunding.

Lending-based Crowdfunding
Lending-based crowdfunding also known as Peer-to-peer (p2p) is a type of debt-based crowdfunding. Money is pulled in from individuals who advance money to others, other individuals or companies that are short of money to run the business (Kraus et al., 2016). It involves a group of people pooling their money as debts to entrepreneurial business start-ups or small businesses in return of interest. Here, p2p bypasses banks and other financial institutions as an intermediary. P2P attracts both borrower and lender where the borrower pays lesser interest and the lender can earn more interest since the borrower's overhead is reduced (Beaulieu et al., 2015). P2P gains its success stories for its capability to overcome early development problems. The ranking of p2p has in fact jumped to second place after the rewards-based crowdfunding. Furthermore, the volume of p2p for business lending in the UK for the last five years had reached £1,490m (Nesta, 2012).

Equity-based Crowdfunding
Apparently, the agenda of donation-based crowdfunding is to help others without any intention to obtain returns. The expansion of donation-based crowdfunding becomes the rewardsbased crowdfunding. The reward can be in the form of t-shirts, mugs, books, tickets, goodie bags, and as simple as printed name in flyers. When the company they funded (via donation or reward) begins to grow, increase revenues, and attract other investors, the former donors would wonder if they should receive some sort of appreciation for the success of the company. Unfortunately, donation and rewards-based crowdfunding do not allow such intention and the company has no obligation to fulfil the intention. Thus, equity crowdfunding (ECF) comes into picture. With equity crowdfunding, investors have a share in the company. A successful company will pay dividends to the investors and vice versa (Freedman & Nutting, 2015).
However, equity-based crowdfunding is also the most complex crowdfunding model. It enables the investors to have ownership in the business, gain income when profitable, and share risks (Belleflamme et al., 2010). Equity crowdfunding enables young business ventures and commercial projects to get money from social virtue investors by transferring the company's ownership in the form of shares (Estrin et al., 2018;Hagedorn & Pinkwart, 2016;Tuomi & Harisson, 2017). The equity crowdfunding alternative financing emerges at the meeting point where public equity intersects with private equity that finances the business ventures, especially those at the start-up business level. However, since the shares of the individual investors are relatively small, they have no power to exercise the due diligence. In order to minimise the risk, the platform as an intermediary has to play its role to ensure the due diligence has been done prior to marketing the entrepreneur's campaign that could attract the investors' intention to invest (Audretsch et al., 2016).
Recently, Estrin et al. (2018) reported that equity crowdfunding in the UK has taken over traditional financing for early stage businesses. It provides the entrepreneur with the marketing place and enables them to be noticed. Interestingly, potential investors and customers could analyse the entrepreneur's project campaign online. Even though investors are new to this type of financing, they enter the market with proper investment knowledge. Thus, they are aware of the potential risks that are involved. In spite of this, equity crowdfunding is not always the entrepreneur's first choice in securing funding and there are circumstances where unprofitable companies with huge debts and highly intangible assets approach the ECF platform to improve their internal financing and debts volume. By doing this, the companies are transferring the risk to the crowd investors for their survival (Walthoff-Borm et al., 2017). Therefore, it is vital to undergo a thorough due diligence process and recognise the firms seeking funding via ECF. These processes will help disseminate clear information, reduce asymmetrical information, and prepare essential policy design that abet crowd investors to understand the risks involved. This is due to the fear that the crowdfunded company may fail after receiving the crowd's money (Ahlers et al., 2015). Protecting the crowd investor is the main reason for the high regulation of equity-based crowdfunding (Belleflamme et al., 2010).

Firm's Human Capital
The firm human capital for this study refers to founder and top management team. Many factors help in shaping an entrepreneurship. One of the factors is the entrepreneur or founder/director who plays an important role as the decision maker in executing the operation that reflects the firm's performance (Islam et al., 2011;Nimalathasan, 2008). The founder's demographic characteristic, for example, age, gender, alma mater, and previous experience tend to influence the firm's performance (Lucas, 2017;Sajilan et al., 2015). The entrepreneur's demography and organisational characteristic will significantly affect profitability. However, they are unable to explain the survival of the organisation (Auster, 1988). Even though this feature is not directly related to the success of the firm, it indeed exploits the skills, attitude, leadership, and managerial abilities that are most significant towards the better performance of the firm (Tanveer et al., 2013).
Top management team (TMT) plays an important role in the decision-making process of the firm. The first seminal study on TMT's relation to organisational outcome was initiated by Hambrick and Mason (1984) using the upper echelon approach. The study examined the effect of TMT's (i.e., chief executives) managerial characteristics (i.e., age, working duration in the organisation, the operational experience, educational background, lifestyle, and share ownership in the organisation) in the US. It concluded that TMT influenced organisational performance. In another study, Turturea, Jansen and Verheul (2015) examined TMT improvisation as a mediating factor on the firm's decision to bootstrap and bricolage. Again, TMT improvisation positively influenced firm performance. Nonetheless, bricolage helped improve while bootstrapping reduced the firm's performance respectively.
Under the RBV theory, the top manager is considered as a firm's resource. Thus, the manager's decision is crucial as it will affect the firm's performance. To illustrate, the TMT's decision to outsource innovation activities will help reduce the risk of failure and high innovation costs. As a consequence, this promotes financial efficiency. TMT moderates the relationship between the RBV and transaction costs economics (TCE) as well as outsourcing decisions that result in performance (Wang & Chen, 2016). In fact, different TMT's intelligent abilities provide several preferences for solving a problem or making a decision. In addition, while the TMT number in SMEs is relatively small, each of the TMTs' individual intelligence has larger weight than the TMT in big firms when deciding on highly risky projects (Rhodes et al., 2018).
The vertical dyad approach also shows the positive influence of TMT (i.e., chairperson) characteristics and enterprise performance. A study conducted on SMEs in China particularly discovered that the TMT's age and number of working years positively affected the enterprises' performance (Xu et al., 2019). Apart from carrying substance in SMEs, TMT further plays a significant role in promoting international expansion in corporate businesses as well (Sambharya, 1996). For some firms, international expansion reflects the market's competitiveness. For others, it is treated more towards economic obligation (Tihanyi et al., 2000). Based on the insights gathered from previous studies, it is clear that TMT positively influences firm performance. This study discusses social networks together with the founder-team relationship. This is due to crowdfunding spirit can be achieved via networks that are built internally and externally.

Age
Previous studies have provided different answers to the influence of the owner's age on firm performance. According to Welmilla, Weerakkody and Ediriweera (2011), age reflects people's lifetime and experiences. As they get older, their skills also improve. Many studies relate age and firm performance (Farrell et al., 2019;Zolin, 2015). The older founder tends to have more industry hours and investments in the financial assets of the firm which will directly influence the profit of the firm (Zolin, 2015). A firm which is directed by an older founder will generate higher incomes in the first year of operation in most of the sectors excluding hi-tech and manufacturing industries (Farrell et al., 2019). As people age, they acquire more knowledge, industry experience and reputations that lead to the new firm success (Dzathor et al., 2013). On the other hand, Tanveer et al. (2013) argue that age is still debatable. The older the person, the chances of becoming an entrepreneur is lesser. However, it significantly influences the firm's success. Earlier, Raposo, do Paço and Ferreira (2008) posit that entrepreneurial opportunities are more when the age increases. However, prior to the age of 24, not many individuals are lured to become entrepreneurs and when they get older, their enthusiasm to become an entrepreneur also declines. Age may not influence the success of the firm directly but as the person ages, he/she will gain more skills, experience, and capabilities that are significant in boosting firm success (Tanveer et al., 2013). It has been found that a new firm that is initiated by a senior business owner will survive albeit less vigorously (Farrell et al., 2019), as he/she will work in a smarter rather than harder way (Zolin, 2015).

Gender
Gender discloses that the female director's management characteristics are different from her male counterpart in terms of management style, the delegations of responsibility within the organisation, organisational structure, goals, and the degree of personal interest in the decision-724 making that influence the overall performance (Mukhtar, 2002). However, the study on general human capital towards growth and survival depicts that female ventures has less potential to grow but will possibly survive (Cooper et al., 1994). This hypothesis is disagreed by Johnsen and McMahon (2005). Statistically, there is no relation between the male-female relationship towards performance and growth, finances and businesses of the organisation under the condition that the appropriate demographic factors and other relevant control factors have been considered in one research (Johnsen & McMahon, 2005). The increase in participation of any gender will produce a curvilinear correlation between the gender composition and the performance of the organisation. Such composition induces similarity towards dissimilarity. Though the female percentage versus productivity relationship (i.e. total revenue per employee) shows irrelevant connection, there is a curvilinear correlation between the female percentage and profitability (i.e. net income before interest and taxes divided by total asset). This shows that the utilisation of the asset to generate income is different under gender diversity. Moreover, despite of the gender dominant effect on the organisation's performance, a more stable gender composition leads to higher organisational performance (Frink et al., 2003).

Education Background
Directors as the prime stakeholder need to address emerging issues strategically if they are to achieve good business performance (Jennings & Beaver, 1997). The directors' industrial and management experiences (Isaga, 2015;Kelliher & Reinl, 2009), family business nature, entrepreneurial seminar, and hands-on training positively relate to the performance of the organisation. In fact, the educational background and the entrepreneurial experience of the founders/directors are incompatibles in determining the firm's performance (Isaga, 2015). However, according to Do Paço, Ferreira, Raposo, Rodrigues and Dinis (2015), entrepreneurial education is not necessarily the main factor in becoming an entrepreneur. Their study empirically investigated two sets of respondents from different schools. One set consisted 729 female students from an all-female school and the students were exposed to entrepreneurship. Another set was composed of 286 male students from a school that specialised in sports. The findings show that male students were more into entrepreneurship rather than female students. Therefore, it can be said that the formal education of the founder does not determine the success factor, as informal education can also become the success factor (Keith et al., 2016). Moreover, the educational background of the founder does not influence the innovation strategy employed by the firm (Kato et al., 2015).

Experience
In the case of new start-up firms, the prior experience of the founder will likely influence the firm achievement (Delmar & Shane, 2006). Founders with managerial experience have more opportunity to exploit. They believe that risk means opportunity. High risk means high returns. Thus, founders with managerial experience would rather exploit different opportunities (Dencker & Gruber, 2015;Gruber, 2010). A founder with managerial experience also tends to embrace prior experience into his/her new start-up firm and he/she is free to exploit the opportunity.
A founder with industrial experience, on the other hand, is more restricted. He/she will likely restrict him/herself from entering risky opportunities. Dencker and Gruber (2015) empirically show that the different experiences gained by the founders will trigger different knowledge that will importantly influence the firm's performance. Their knowledge and skill will not only influence the

External Networks
Previous studies on social capital in the crowdfunding sphere emphasise on how external social capital in the form of third-party social network contacts (Giudici et al., 2013;Mollick, 2014;Zheng et al., 2014), and family-friends (Kuppuswamy & Bayus, 2018;Ordanini et al., 2011) affect funding outcomes. Empirically, it has been shown that early-stage backing from these private networks generate a reinforcement tool that leads to immediate funding success (Kuppuswamy & Bayus 208;Lehner, 2013;Ordanini et al., 2011). In spite of that, family-friends ties relate to first-time sponsoring (Agrawal et al., 2015;Bygrave, 2004;Bygrave et al., 2003).
A study conducted by Liao et al. (2015) did not conclude significantly the relationship of both types of social capital to the success of crowdfunding which would later affect the survival of the firm. However, for investment-based crowdfunding projects, the existence of internal and external social networks plays an important role that significantly influences performance. Hence, this shows that when founders support other founders' crowdfunding project, this will help their own project when it is launched on the platform in the future.

Platform Provider
In the United States, more than USD five billion were raised through crowdfunding platform providers in 2013 alone. It then increased to 188 per cent for the next year (Montini, 2014). The platforms establish chances for start-ups and SMEs in particular to obtain money by bridging the entrepreneurs and investors. At the same time, they maintain the secrecy that tie them up (Mollick, 2014;Ordanini et al., 2011). As crowdfunding forms are different, the platforms' role also differs from each other. They shift from non-pecuniary to pecuniary motives (Calic & Mosakowski, 2016).
Platform providers potentially attract the investor's willingness to participate on the project launched on the platform rather than word of mouth attraction (Lacan & Desmet, 2017). In equity crowdfunding, government intervention towards the crowdfunding platform increases the herding effect of the investors. This is due to better information disclosure and standard of operation to be adhered by the platform. As the consequence, the herding effect reduces the investor's risk exposure, hence, increases the investor's level of confidence (Jiang et al., 2018). Further exploration determines the existence of herding effect under pecuniary-based crowdfunding platforms. Platform with a high number of investors subsequently attracts other potential investors (Jiang et al., 2018). Table 1 below represents four ECF platforms in Malaysia. These are platforms that provide information as mentioned in the tables. Other ECF platforms that are unable to provide the information needed are excluded. According to Kassim, Wahab and Muhamed (2020), ECF platforms in Malaysia play important roles in assist the entrepreneurs that interested in ECF. The table shows that Pitchin platform has been approached by many entrepreneurs and the investors. All entrepreneurs that successfully placed their campaigns on the Pitchin's platform managed to fulfil their funding goals.

Internal Networks
The internal social capital network in crowdfunding is described as a relationship which exists in the crowdfunding ecosystem between the founder and the platform provider (Liao et al., 2015). They would mutually share the group's determination and goals under the similar guidelines, which relates to the mutual acts of the members that would possibly generate opportunities among them (Huber, 2009). In all actuality, building a trustworthy relationship within the crowdfunding population 727 for funding success is essential (Helmer, 2014). According to Zheng, Li, Wu and Xu (2014), the relationship can be identified from the website where the campaign is launched. In the case where another founder 'likes' and 'supports' another member's project, this will attract potential investors to invest and also indicates the obligation of another party to back the future project of others in the group as it displays closeness and trustworthiness.
Both closeness and trustworthiness spur the performance and social capital (Moran, 2005). As a result, the trusted projects will attract the potential investors and increase the possibility to be funded (Liao et al., 2015), thus increasing firm performance. In addition, Skirnevskiy et al., (2017) provided evidence that the internal social network is capable of promoting creator-backers relationship that provides future competitive advantage. This enables the creation of loyal backers' community to support the creator's future campaign. This loyal crowdfunding community acts as the resources to the venture. The study also determined the possibility of internal networking superseding the external networking "family and friends" ties for future campaign success. The present study will attempt to measure the potential of social capital networks to the growth and productivity of the SMEs.
As shown in table 1, Pitchin has many followers as compared to other platforms. Thus, this might one of the reason more investors interested in this platforms.  (Kassim et al., 2020)

Research and Methodology
This study adopts conceptual research approach by examining and analysing previous literatures on the topic. This study will answer the following questions; i) how founder, TMT, and networks influence the performance of the ECF funded firm and ii) how platform moderates the FTMT and networks to influence the performance of the firm.

Theoretical Framework
This study could be best explained by the underpinning theory of small firm performance together with the bricolage theory in finance and the signalling theory.

Theory of Small Firm Performance
In measuring small firm's performance, most of the studies in the literature would adopt the theoretical framework established by Storey (1994). The theory highlights the demographic features of the firm, the founder-director's characteristics, and the strategy/ies employed are the important factors that influence the firm performance. Among the notable studies include those conducted by Halabi et al. (2010), Ebben & Johnson (2011), Chen & Yu (2012), and Blackburn, et al., (2013. The founder and TMT as a proxies for the firm play an important roles that lead to wise decision making. For instance, when the TMT decide on using ECF to fund their project as explained in the next theory.

Theory of Financial Bricolage
However, Desa and Basu (2013) argue that further research should be done to examine the bricolage effect on performance, and specifically, innovation. As the concept of the theory of bricolage is to take advantage of entrepreneurial opportunities, it can thus be internal and external. Internal bricolage refers to the entrepreneur's characteristics; experience and knowledge of the market, customers' issues and other attributes that will help to encounter issues and capture emerging opportunities. External bricolage, on the contrary, indicates the entrepreneur's behaviour to fully utilise the external resources available at that time (Vanevenhoven et al., 2011).
Nevertheless, both serve the purposes of generating new combinations of resourceful inputs with the intention to foster firm performance (Brush et al., 2001;Kariv & Coleman, 2015;Sirmon & Hitt, 2003). A previous study by Kariv and Coleman (2015) adopts RBV with the extension of the theory of bricolage from the perspective of microloan. The present study will investigate the matter from the perspective of equity crowdfunding. This theory helps to explain the founder-director's or top management team's behaviour or ability to take up opportunities from the equity crowdfunding event for the benefit of the firm. On top of that, any decision or actions taken will signal other parties that might interested in the firm's project.

Theory of Signalling
The signalling theory which was introduced by Spence (1973) can be applied to various fields; economic, accounting, finance, entrepreneurship, and education. It is a theory that helps to elaborate the behaviour of organisations or individuals when dealing with asymmetric information. It is vital for the receiver to be able to interpret the signal sent by the sender, hence lessening the asymmetric information between the involved parties (Spence, 2002). Connelly, Certo, Ireland and Reutzel (2011) argue about the dynamic of the signalling theory.
Equity crowdfunding, for instance, observe that investors as the receiver would show an interest on start-up that signals "signal fit' and "low degree of ambiguity." Substantially, these two signals of human capital of the sender (entrepreneur) influence the success of the campaign by convincing the investors' motivation to participate (Piva & Rossi-Lamastra, 2018). However, from the perspective of prior financing, firms that have financing history with sophisticated or retail investors, BAs, project grants and venture capitalists portray quality relationships. This relationship will positively influence the equity crowdfunding campaign success. When a firm's social capital and human capital are at par, this tends to make its crowdfunding campaign successful (Kleinert et al., 2018;Signori & Vismara, 2016). Figure 1: Theoretical Framework The figure 1 summarizes the linkage of these three theories towards the performance of the ECF firms. It illustrates the knowledgeable entrepreneur would know when to grab the opportunities and how to get the resources needed as explained by financial theory of bricolage. Knowingly, startup and new firms are exposed to many risks, thus, the entrepreneur responsible to reduce the asymmetry information that might tarnish the firm. This when the signalling theory can be applied in the ECF ecosystem. The signal provides the ECF stakeholders information on the firm performance.

Findings
Funding from ECF is up to MYR 3 million and can be increased by another MYR 2 million in the following year (Securities Commission of Malaysia, 2017). Thus, shows that ECF funding is not the ultimate funding for the entrepreneurial ventures (Caldbeck, 2013). However, it can can be a jumpstart especially for start-up to operate and get acknowledgment from the public about their products or services (Caldbeck, 2014). The findings indicate that founder and TMT are part of the firm vital assets. The quality human asset in one firm implicitly signal its value. Under ECF ecosystem, other than founder and TMT, the social networks play a vital roles too.
Before the ECF, the networks merely related to families and friends. After the crowdfunding process, the networks getting bigger and bigger. This is the effect of 'the wisdom of crowd' (Clauss et al., 2018). The strong networks explain the trustworthiness and closeness remain in the firm. Once the entrepreneur decides for ECF fund, first thing first he or she has to make contact with PP. This PP has its own networks. As an entrepreneur, being recognized by PP networks is an added advantage. The reason is that PP networks comprise of business angels and venture capitalist which have more capital for investment. The effect of crowdfunding does not stop when the campaign end. Thus, ECF funded firm with its promising human capital, social capital and reputable platform provider able to convert the business plan attractiveness that able to attract financial capital from investors when needed. ECF platform and government intervention help evolve entrepreneurship in Malaysia.

Of ECF Firm
Theory of Signalling -Informtion asymmetry -Investor's participation -ECF platform's reputation

Theory of Financial Bricolage -Opportunities -Innovation
Theory of Small Firm Performance -Founder/TMT demography -Firm demography -Strategies Knowledge is important. Especially knowledge that relates to current mainstream involving entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial financing. As an entrepreneur it is vital to equip himself to the standard of this mainstream.

Discussion
There are various factors could influence the performance of the firms. In this study, founder, TMT and their networks are considered as internal factors and the platform provider is the external factor that affected the performance. In addition, Marinova, Plantenga and Remery (2016) suggest further investigation on gender diversity and firm performance. Whereas, Lucas (2017) highlights that family-based firms are less likely perform better than cooperatives, partnerships, private companies, public companies. He also added that male-generated firms' performance are higher than femaleoperated firms.
However, in this study, the ECF highlights that the quality of founder and his team, the large number of social networks they have and the highflying platform they engaged with are part of the reason the investors making their decision to invest. As a consequences, the performance of the ECF funded firms improve. Again this study is a conceptual based, the empirical finding is needed to support the findings.
The ECF platform is one of the main actors in the process. It acts as the "network orchestra" that connect the entrepreneurs and investors. Thus, prior to participate in the ECF, the entrepreneur is encouraged to build "personal contact" with the platform. The entrepreneur needs to be noticeable by the platform's network. After all, the selection criteria of the platform is almost the same with business angel and venture capitalist (Löher, 2017). Ahead of fulfil the entrepreneurs funding need, the ECF platforms provides more benefits in term of social networks. According to Brown, Mawson and Rowe (2019), these social networks change along the crowdfunding process. Where they will evolve to business network that is essential for the start-up to grow.

Conclusion
The emergence of ECF fund and its comrades have evolved the entrepreneurial landscape of developing and developed countries worldwide. More than that crowdfunding can be tailored according to the fund needed based on the project purposes. It has been widely used in real estate (Cohen, 2016), agricultural (Anshari et al., 2019) and health industries in many countries (Al-Kadi & Chatterjee, 2012). The revolution in financial industry known as fintech, even though it disrupts the traditional banking system, it makes the crowdfunding process more viable. In fact, some of the banks have collaborated and tailor their business model featuring the new emergent fund, ECF. For example in Malaysia the establishment of Investment Account Platform (IAP) (Kasri & Muhammad, 2019). This platform is where the entrepreneurs will approach for funding. Then they will be channelled to the 'funders' via the anticipated Islamic banks (Investment Account Platform, 2016). The uniqueness of this research is that previous studies yet to discuss how PP moderates the effect of founder, TMT and networks towards the ECF funded firm performance. The importance of PP in assists the firms to obtain more funding for growth.
Platforms with vast networks influence investors' participation. Hence, influence the success of the ECF campaigns. These networks also shape the post-event performance of the firm (Brown et al., 2019). It provides an alternative resources that is crucial for the survival of the firm. Even though, ECF is not the ultimate funding for the entrepreneurs, it evolves the entrepreneurial landscape that no longer depends solely on financial institution. The unique of this type of funds is that it can be tailored according to the entrepreneur's funding need (Mayorova & Petrenko, 2018). Hence, as an entrepreneur the knowledge and skills are essential tools in exploring ECF and other fintech tools such as blockchain (Roth et al., 2019) that would unlocked opportunities beyond their expectation. Knowledge about which platform gives better offer, services and assistance to secure ECF fund effectively (Loher, 2017) and designs growth program for them. This is in line with the entrepreneurship knowledge spillover theory. Where according to this theory, high knowledge settings generate more entrepreneurial opportunities (Audretsch & Keilbach, 2007).
The government and its agencies need to magnify their strategy to assist the platforms to increase their potential effectively (Troise, 2019); assist the entrepreneur to gain the accurate and adequate knowledge related to the new emergence fintech tools, specifically the ECF that is in line with the financial theory of bricolage (Kariv & Coleman, 2015). Meanwhile, the higher learning institutions need to adapt ECF and its associates into their entrepreneurship learning cohort. The crowdfunding and other financial technology affect the current entrepreneurial landscape and they will continuously change it in the future.
Exposure to crowdfunding should covers the wide spectrum of crowdfunding such as ECF, P2P and real estate crowdfunding (Mayorova & Petrenko, 2018) and should not be restricted to donationbased only (Man et al., 2019). There are many rooms of ECF can be explored and investigated by researchers. For instance, the impact of ECF fund on the performance of the crowdfundee firms in Malaysia. Thus, this study contributes to the theoretical in term of the application of the chosen theories in the crowdfunding studies particularly in Malaysia.