ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
The option for an accounting policy is determined by the need to provide an accurate image of the financial position and performance in the institution. Thus, for the subsequent evaluation of tangible fixed assets, a public institution should choose the optimal accounting policy, that is either the cost-based pattern or the revaluation method, so that it can provide relevant, prudent and complete data in all significant aspects by means of its financial reports.
Chi?u, A. G. (2010), Councelor – public institutions accounting, Rentrop & Straton Publishing House, Bucharest.
Dasc?lu, C. (2006), The convergence of public accounting in Romania to the international public sector accounting standards, C.E.C.C.A.R. Publishing House, Bucharest.
IFAC. (2009). International Public Sector Accounting Standards Textbook, vol.I and II, C.E.C.C.A.R. Publishing House, Bucharest.
Tenovici, C. O. (2013). National and international in public institutions accounting, Sitech Publishing House, Craiova.
Accounting Law no. 82 (1991), republished, Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 454/18 June 2008.
In-Text Citation: (Tenovici, 2013)
To Cite this Article: Tenovici, C. O. (2013). The Evaluation Subsequent to the Recognition of Tangible Fixed Assets in Public Institutions – Revaluation Method. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 3(2), 1–14.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode