ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Non-financial information such as environmental, social, and governance (hereafter ESG) issues are becoming important as financial data. There has been a series of organizational failures and controversies about corporate governance, which have raised questions about the capabilities of management and ethical behaviour on the business's level of transparency. Even factors that influence or detract from an ESG score are becoming increasingly relevant to consider. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between board characteristics and ESG score in Malaysian listed firms. In particular, this study examines four important board charactristics; board size, board independence, tenure, and board diversity on ESG score. Using 165 firm- year observations from 2017 to 2019, the findings reveal that the board independence is significantly positively associated with ESG scores. Other board characteristics; board size, tenure and board diversity, however, is not associated with ESG score. Several control variables, namely firm size, profitability, and leverage have been considered in the study, and it found that all control variables have a significant impact on ESG scores. This study contributes to the governance and ESG literature in the developing countries byhighlighting the effect of board characteristics on firm's ESG scores.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. B. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance An International Review, 14(5), 418–431.
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161.
Aribi, Z. A., Alqatamin, R. M., & Arun, T. (2018). Gender diversity on boards and forward-looking information disclosure: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 205–222.
Bae, K.-H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z. (jason), & Guedhami, O. (2021). Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67(101876), 101876.
B?tae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleag?, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290(125791), 125791.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.
Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the Board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking
system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699.
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685–701.
Braz, M. J. O., & Lopes, A. I. (2018). The relationship between board’s diversity and the reputation of integrated reports. In XVIII Encontro Internacional AECA. Liboa: Asociasion Espanola de Contabilidad y Administracion de Empresas.
Clements, C. E., Jessup, R. K., Neill, J. D., & Wertheim, P. (2018). The relationship between director tenure and director quality. International Journal of Disclosure Governance, 15, 142–161.
Dewayanto, T., Rahmawati, & Suhardjanto, D. (2020). Intitutional ownership, blockholder ownership and the board's tenure to disclosure of corporate governance. Ekuilibrium: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 15(1), 83–90.
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360.
Fakhari, H., Pitenoie, R. Y., Doi, F., H., & Pitenoie, R. Y. (2017). The impact of audit committee and its characteristics on the firms' information environment. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 10(3), 577–608.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (p. 46). Boston: Pitman.
Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson.
Handajani, L., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(12), 8-16.
Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364.
Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641-660.
Hassan, L. S., Saleh, M. N., & Ibrahim, I. (2020). Board diversity, company's financial performance and corporate social responsibility information disclosure in Malaysia. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 23–49.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.
Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender?related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in management review. 21(2), 113–130.
Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1–19.
Ismail, A. M., & Latiff, I. H. M. (2019). Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 31–50.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.
Khaireddine, H., Salhi, B., Aljabr, J., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Impact of board characteristics on governance, environmental and ethical disclosure. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 273–295.
Khan, I., Khan, I., & Senturk, I. (2019). Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance, 19(6), 1187–1203.
Mallin, C. A., & Michelon, G. (2011). Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 119–144.
Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224.
Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237(117727), 117727.
Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: new empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494.
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.
Ratri, M. C., Harymawan, I., & Kamarudin, K. A. (2021). Busyness, tenure, meeting frequency of the CEOs, and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Sustainability, 13(10), 5567.
Refinitiv Eikon Datastream. 2021. Available.
http://www.refinitive.com/en/products/datastream-macroeconomics-analysis. (Accessed 23 January 2021)
Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 1-16.
Rutherford, M. A., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2007). Investigating the relationship between board characteristics and board information. Corporate Governance An International Review, 15(4), 576–584.
Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 24, 13–28.
Sankara, J. L., D., & Nowland, J. (2017). Are board governance characteristics associated with ethical corporate social responsibility disclosure? The case of the mandatory conflict minerals reporting requirements. Journal of Leadership. Accountability and Ethics, 14(3), 101–116.
Shahab, Y., & Ye, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87–103.
Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72(102144), 102144.
Shakil, M. H., Tasnia, M., & Mostafiz, M. I. (2021). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance controversies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661–677.
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585.
Shiah-Hou, S.-R., & Cheng, C.-W. (2012). Outside director experience, compensation, and performance. Managerial Finance, 38(10), 914–938.
Steenkamp, G., Dippenaar, M., Fourie, C., & Franken, D. (2019). Share-based remuneration: Per-director disclosure practices of selected listed South African companies. Journal of Economic & Financial Sciences, 12(1). doi:10.4102/jef.v12i1.400
Sulaiman, M., Abdullah, N., & Fatima, A. H. (2014). Determinants of environmental reporting quality in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 22(1), 63–90.
Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680.
Tejedo-Romero, F., & Araujo, J. F. (2018). Transparency, social responsibility and corporate governance: human capital of companies. Cuadernos de Gestion, 18(2), 133–162.
Teplova, T., Sokolova, T. V., & Munir, Q. (2020). Eikon Refinitiv, Bloomberg and Cbonds databases for solving research problems. In Emerging Bond Markets (pp. 306–323). Routledge.
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.
Valls Martínez, M. del C., & Cruz Rambaud, S. (2019). Women on corporate boards and firm's financial performance. Women's Studies International Forum, 76(102251), 102251.
Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98–109.
Von Arx, U., & Ziegler, A. (2014). The effect of corporate social responsibility on stock performance: new evidence for the USA and Europe. Quantitative Finance, 14(6), 977–991.
Ward, A. M., & Forker, J. (2017). Financial management effectiveness and board gender diversity in member-governed, community financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 351–366.
Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H.-B. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 381–392.
Zuraida, Z., Houqe, N., & van Zijl, T. (2016). Value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2722917
In-Text Citation: (Halid et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Halid, S., Mahmud, R., Suffian, M. T. M., & Rahman, R. A. (2022). Does Firm’s Board Affects ESG? Malaysian Evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 12(1), 131–143.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode