Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2225-8329

Consideration of Significant Audit Matters: An Evaluation

Muthyaah Mohd Jamil, Muslimah Mohd Jamil

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v13-i3/18928

Open access

Key Audit Matters (KAM) are the main component in independent auditor reports. The requirement for the KAM started in 2015, whereby the auditors were required to provide the auditor to identify the significant audit risk and explain the audit procedure that undertook while conducting the audit practices. The purpose of this study is to provide a review of academic literature about Key Audit Matters (KAM) from 2019 until 2022. This study found that the discussion can be divided into three categories which are the factors that influence the disclosure of KAM, the effect of KAM and the narrative reporting of KAM. This study also provides several potential research areas at the end of the discussion.

Almoataz, E. S., Baatwah, S. R., Omer, W. K., & Aljaaidi, K. S. (2022). Does KAM disclosure make a difference in emerging markets? An investigation into audit fees and report lag. International Journal of Emerging Market.
Baatwah, S. R. (2022). Key audit matters and big 4 auditors in Oman: a quantile approarch analysis. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1985-2517.
El-Haddad, R., Hegazy, M. A., & Kamareldawla, N. M. (2022). Impact of auditor characteristics and Covid-19 Pandemic on KAMs reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Ernst & Young Global Limited. (1 Oct, 2015). Key Audit Matters: what they are and why they are important. Retrieved from EY Building a Better Working World: https://www.ey.com/en_my/assurance/how-the-auditing-profession-is-transforming-to-meet-future-challenges
Evans, G., Lusher, J., & Day, S. (2020). Completeness of the qualitative characteristics using Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and content analysis paradigms: towards a revised conceptual framework. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1985-2517.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In M. Meyer, & R. Wodak, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 121 - 138). London: Sage Publication.
Fera, P., Pizzo, M., Vinviguerra, R., & Ricciardi, G. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance and new auditing issues: a preliminary empirical evidence on key audit matters. Corporate Governance, 22(1), 194-211.
Frezatti, F., Carter, D. B., & Barroso, M. F. (2014). Accounting without accounting: Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(3), 426-264.
Hategan, C.-D., Pitorac, R.-I., & Crucean, A. C. (2022). Impact of Covid -19 pandemic on auditors' responsibility: evidence from European listed companies on key audit matters. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Hegazy, A. M., & Kamareldawla, N. M. (2021). Key audit matters: did IAASB unravel the knots of confusion in audit reports decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(8), 1025-1052.
Hossain, M. M., Bhuiyan, M. B., & Rahaman, M. M. (2022). Disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) in financial reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Boards. (14 January, 2015). Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent. Retrieved from International Standard of Auditing (ISA) 701: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-auditing-isa-701-new-communicating-key-audit-matters-independent-auditors-4
Izma, N. (1 January , 2018). Enhanced Auditors’ Report – Driving Better Governance. Retrieved from The Malaysian Institute of Accountant : Accountant Today: https://www.at-mia.my/2018/01/01/enhanced-auditors-report-driving-better-governance/
Jager, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In M. Meyer, & R. Wodak, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32-62). London: Sage Publication.
Kitiwong, W., & Sarapaivanich, N. (2020). Consequences of the implementation of expandded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1095-1119.
Lau, C. K. (2021). Management uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspectivce of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(1), 79-95.
Li, H., Hay, D., & Lau, D. (2019). Assessing the impact of new auditors' report. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(1), 110-132.
Liu, H., Ning, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Key audit matters and debt contracting: evidence from China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(6), 657-678.
Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions, and theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 433-469.
Mihret, D. G., Kansal, M., Muttakin, M. B., & Rana, T. (2022). The auditing profession and the key audit matter reporting requirement. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 19(1), 107-125.
Nguyen, L. A., & Kend, M. (2021). The perceived impact of the KAM reforms on audit reports, audit quality and auditor work practices: stakeholders’ perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 437-462.
NST Business. (25 January, 2018). Investors laud higher transparency in enhanced auditors report. Retrieved from New Strait Times: https://www.nst.com.my/business/2018/01/328746/investors-laud-higher-transparency-enhanced-auditors-report
NST Business. (29 July, 2021). SC urges auditors to heighten diligence, professionalism. Retrieved from News Straits Times: https://www.nst.com.my/business/2021/07/712946/sc-urges-auditors-heighten-diligence-professionalism
Pratoomsuwan, T., & Yolrabil, O. (2020). Key audit matter and auditor liability: evidence from auditor evaluators in Thailand. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(4), 741-762.
Rahaman, M. M., & Chand, P. (2021). Implications of recent reforms to auditor reporting requirements in Australia. Meditari Accountancy Research.
Rautiainen, A., Jani, S., & Kati, P. (2021). Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(3), 386-404.
Segal, M. (2019). Key audit matters: insight from audit experts. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(3), 472-494.
Solitander, N., & Herlin , H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as relief from responsibility. Critical perspectives on international business, 13(1), 2-22.
Suttipun. (2022). External auditor and KAMs reporting in alternative capital market of Thailand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 74-93.
Suttipun, M. (2021). Impact of key audit matters (KAMs) reporting on audit quality: evidence from Thailand. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(5), 870 - 882.
Velte, P. (2020). Associations between the financial and industry expertise of audit committee members and key audit matters within related audit reports. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(1), 185-200.
Wuttichindanon, S., & Issarawornrawanich, P. (2020). Determining factors of key audit matter disclosure in Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(4), 563-584.

N/A