ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
In today's competitive world, information technology is a wide field and has enabled organizations across the world to work in an efficient manner. Organizations are constantly seeking new ways to maximize the effect of organizational justice between their employees. Main purpose of this study is to study the effect of information technology in organization for making procedural justice. In this research, we used field research technique and for gathering data collection used questionnaires. Statistical population was employees of Telecommunication Company of Isfahan that they are 600 employees. Then, distributed 234 questionnaires based on convenience sampling. Method of research was T-value for analyzing, we used spss software. The result of this research indicates the meaningful and direct relationship between information technology and procedural justice in Telecommunication Company of Isfahan.
Albanese, R., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244–255.
Ambrose, M. L., & Kulick, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new face: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 231–292.
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkow itz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
Adams, G. A., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1996). Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work–family conflict with job and life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 411 – 420.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 43-90). New York: Academic Press.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for justice.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 1, 43–55.
Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R.
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L.L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289- 319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Sheppard, B. (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 165–210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
Colquitt, J .A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 3–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 89–118). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applie d Psychology, 74, 293-299.
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.317–372), New York: Wiley.
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moralvirtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164–209.
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Threeroads to organizational justice. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 1–113). New York: Elsevier Science.
Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79-90.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Greenberg, E. (1975). Minimum Variance Properties of Principal Component Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349), 194-197.
Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389–435).New York: Academic Press.
Greenberg, J. (1984). On the apocryphal nature of inequity distress. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of in justice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 167–186). New York: Plenum Press.
Greenberg, J. (1981). The justice of distributing scarce and abundant resources. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior (pp. 289–316). New York: Plenum.
Greenberg, J. (1983). Overcoming egocentric bias in perceived fairness through self-awareness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 152–156.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,340–342.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103.
Greenberg, J. (1988). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606–613.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91–131). NewYork: Academic Press.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural justice: A psychological analysis.
In-Text Citation: (Dehaghani & Mirhadi, 2013).
To Cite this Article: Dehaghani, M. V., & Mirhadi, F. S. (2013). Impressing Organizational Justice Rules Based on Information Technology (Case Study: Telecommunication Company). International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences. 3(4), 260 – 274.
Copyright: © 2013 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode