ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This research constitutes a bibliometric in the field of WAQF. The data was taken from the SCOPUS database. Research on waqf was initiated in 1914. This study analysed the development trend and origin of scientific literature published in the field of waqf. The study used Publish or Perish software and VOSviewer in incorporating and visualising the data, respectively. The data was also analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 25.0. A standard bibliometric analysis was employed to present the citation analysis, research productivity, and evolution of publications. The findings of 529 total documents suggested that there was a yearly increase in the literature concerning waqf, especially after 2010. Most of these articles were published in the form of academic journals and literature reviews, which were mainly written in English. The research in waqf, conducted mostly in Malaysia, comprised of the social sciences, arts and humanities and economics, econometrics, and finance field. The main keywords used in this study were waqf and cash waqf. These ?ndings should assist the potential directions for future research and facilitate the establishment of collaboration strategies between authors and institutions.
AbdelMohsin, M. I. (2013). Financing through cash-waqf: a revitalization to ?nance different needs. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 6(4), 304-321.
Ahmi, A., Elbardan, H., & Ali, R. H. R. M. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature on Industry 4.0. In 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Burnham J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomed. Digit. Libr., 3(1), 1-8.
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Information (International Social Science Council), 22(2), 191-235.
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Soc. Sci., 9(5), 18-26.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J.A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015(105), 1809-1831.
Hussin, R. (2018). WAQF implementation in Malaysian university: overview and way forward. The Social Sciences, 13(1), 145-149.
IGI Global, “What is Bibliometric Analysis.” [Online]. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/bibliometric-analysis/2406. [Accessed: 06-Oct-2018]. IGI Global, “What is Bibliometric Analysis.” [Online]. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/bibliometric-analysis/2406. [Accessed: 06-July-2020].
Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131.
Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 97, 261-275.
In-Text Citation: (Nawi et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Nawi, H. M., Mohaiyadin, N. M., Kumar, N., Ghazali, S. A. M., Sapiai, N. S., & Rusok, N. H. M. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis on Waqf. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 11(1), 139-152.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode