ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Decision is best implemented using the social power. Social power exists in everywhere and needs for every organization actor. As an independent governance mechanism, Audit Committee (AC) needs social power to achieve the desired governance outcome. However, study of the social power which contributes to AC effectiveness is limited, especially in Malaysia. Majority of the past researches only focused on the formal characteristic as the contributor for AC effectiveness. A comprehensive view on AC studies is needed. With ongoing frauds, public confidence towards AC effectiveness has been impaired. Factors which will enhance AC effectiveness have become the major concern. Thus, this research attempts to propose a conceptual framework to investigate the influence of perceived social powers: independence, expert, legitimate, institutional support, diligence and sanctionary power towards AC effectiveness. This paper seeks to close the literature gap by investigating the AC effectiveness in different dimension and leads to deeper understanding of AC dynamic powers. It provides guidance to AC members on which social power is important and how these powers affect their effectiveness. It also sheds some light for the regulators to identify the AC social power which contributes to the effectiveness that cannot easily be codified in the governance code.
Abbott, L. J., and Parker, S. (2000) Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2), pp. 47-66.
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peter, G. F., and Rama, D. V. (2007). Corporate governance, audit quality and the Sarbanes- Oxley Act: evidence from internal audit outsourcing. Accounting Review, 82(4), pp. 803- 835.
Archambeault, D. S., DeZoort, F. T., and Hermanson, D. R. (2008). Audit committee incentive compensation and accounting restatement, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), pp. 965-992.
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., and Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), pp. 65-122.
Bedard, J., and Gendron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the financial reporting system: can audit committee deliver? International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), pp. 174-210.
Bedard, J., Chtourou, S., and Couteau, L. (2004). The effective of audit committee expertise, independence and activity on aggressive earning management. Auditing, 23(2), pp. 15-37.
Benton, W. C., and Maloni, M. (2005). The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), pp. 1-22.
Braynion, P. (2004). Review essay: Power and leadership. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 18(6), pp. 447-463.
Bronson, S. N., Carcello, J. V., Hollingsworth, C. W., and Neal, T. L. (2009). Is fully independent audit committee really necessary? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), pp. 265-280.
Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 95-117.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., and Ye, Z. X. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: insights, practice, implications and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), pp. 1-31.
Chau, G., and Leung, P. (2006). The impact of board composition and family ownership on audit committee formation: evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(1), pp. 1-15.
Chen, M., Moroney, R., and Houghton, K. (2005). Audit committee composition and the use of an industry specialist audit firm. Accounting and Finance, 45(2), pp. 217-239.
Clegg, S. R., and Hardy, C. (1999), Studying Organization: Theory and Method, Sage, London.
Cohen J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., and Wright, A. M. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality, Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, pp. 87-152.
Defond, M., Hann, R. N., and Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), pp. 153-193.
DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members’ oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), pp. 1-21.
DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., and Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: a synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38-75.
Farmer, S., and Aguinis, H. (2005). Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisor power: an identity-dependence model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1069-83.
Fearnley, S., and Beattie, V. (2004). The reform of the UK’s auditor independence framework after the Enron collapse: an example of evidence-based policy making. International Journal of Auditing, 8(2), pp. 117-138.
Fedor, D. B., and Ramsay, R. J. (2007). Effects of supervisor power on preparers’ responses to audit review: a field study. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19, 91-105.
French, J. R. P. Jr., and Raven, B. H. (1959).The bases of social power in Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Goodrich, K., and Mangleburg, T. F. (2010). Adolescent perceptions of parent and peer influences on teen purchase: an application of social power theory. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1328-1335.
Handy, C. (1993), Understanding Organizations, 4th ed., Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), pp. 3-16.
Hian, C. K., and Chan, K. L. (1997). The effects of power bases on subordinate compliance and satisfaction: an empirical study of accountants. British Accounting Review, 29, pp. 49-65.
Ibrahim, A. L. (2006). Audit committee effectiveness: Australia and Saudi Arabia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University.
Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., and Cooper, C. L. (2011). Social power as a means of increasing personal and organizational effectiveness: the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(3), pp. 412-432.
Jayasingam, S., Ansari, M. A., Jantan, M. (2009). Influencing knowledge workers: the power of top management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), pp. 134-151. DOI: 10.1108/02635571011008443
Kalbers, L. P., and Forgarty, T. J. (1993). Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of contribution of power. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12, pp. 24-49.
Kalbers, L. P., and Forgarty, T. J. (1998). Organizational and economic explanations of audit committee oversight. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), pp. 129-150.
Khoo, B.Y. (2003). Corporate governance in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Review of Corporate Governance in Asia Seminar, Tokyo, Japan.
Kim, L.L. (2008). An empirical investigation of the impact of supervisory power bases on subordinates. Asian Social Science, 4(7), 54-63.
Kim, L. L., and Guan, T. L. (2008). The exercise of social power and the effect of ethnicity: evidence from Malaysian’s Industrial Companies. International Business Research, 1(2), pp. 53-65.
Kim, L. L., and Guan, T. L. (2010). The influence of social power and educational orientation on the outcome of superior- subordinate dyadic relationship. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), pp. 598- 616.
Klein, A. (2002). Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, 77(2), pp. 435-452.
Koslowsky, M., and Stashevsky, S. (2005). Organizational values and social power. International Journal of Manpower, 26(1), pp. 23-34.
KPMG Malaysia Fraud Survey Report. (2009). Retrieved January 1, 2010 from http://www.kpmg.com.my/kpmg/publications/home/fraud%20survey%20report%2009_Final.pdf
Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Accounting Review, 82(4), pp. 963-1008.
Lavelle, L. (2002). Commentary: how governance rules failed at Enron. Bloomberg Business Week, p.28.
Lee, T. H., and Azham, M. A. (2008, March). The evolving roles of auditors: Where do we go from here? Accountants Today. Retrieved July 20, 2009 from http://www.mia.org.my/at/at/200803/06.pdf
Liao, L. F. (2008). Knowledge-sharing in R&D departments: a social power and social exchange theory perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), pp. 1881-1895.
Lo, M. C., and Ramayah, T. (2011). The multi-dimensional nature of power bases in a non-western context. The case of Malaysia. Journal of Management Research, 11(2), pp. 99-111.
Lucas, J. W., and Baxter, A. R. (2012). Power, influence, and diversity in organizations. The Annals of the American Academy, 639, pp. 49-70. DOI: 10.1177/0002716211420231
Magrane, J., and Malthus, S. (2010). Audit committee effectiveness: a public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(5), pp. 427-443.
McDaniel, L., Martin, R. D., and Maines, L. A. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: the effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. Accounting Review, 77(4), pp. 139-168.
Menon, K., and Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committee for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13, pp. 121-139.
Merlo, O., Whitwell, G., and Lukas, B. A. (2004). Power and Marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12(4), pp. 207-218.
Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., and Margaret, B. (2007). Auditing and Assurance Service in Malaysia (3rd Ed.). Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Sdn Bhd.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mohd Saad, S. S., Evans, J. G., and Zulkarnain, M.S. (2006). Senior managers’ perception on audit committee composition and effectiveness: some evidence from Malaysia. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=924140
Morgan, G. (1990), Images of Organization, Sage, London.
Nygaard, A., and Biong, H. (2010). The influence of retail management’s use of social power on corporate ethical values, employee commitment and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, pp. 87-108. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0497-y
Persons, O. S. (2005). The relationship between the new corporate governance rules and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(2), pp. 125-148.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Raghunandan, K., Read, W., and Raman, D. (2001). Audit committee composition, grey directors, and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), pp. 105-118.
Rahmat, M. M., Iskandar, T. M., and Saleh, N. M. (2009). Audit committee characteristics in financially distressed and non-distressed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(7), pp. 624-638.
Rajan, S., and Krishnan, V. R. (2002). Impact of gender on influence, power and authoritarianism. Women in Management Review, 17(5), pp. 197-206.
Raven, B. H. (1965). Social Influence and Power (Eds). Current Studies in Social Psychology, New York: Wiley.
Robbins, S. P., DeCenzo, D. A., and Coulter, M. (2011). Fundamentals of Management (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Rupley, K., Almer, E., and Philbrick, D. (2011). Audit committee effectiveness: perceptions of public company audit committee members’ post-SOX. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23 (2), pp. 138-144.
Ruzaidah, R., and Takiah, M. I. (2004). The effectiveness of audit committee in monitoring the quality of corporate reporting. Corporate Governance: An International Perspective. MICG Publication: pp. 154-175.
Saam, N. J. (2007). Asymmetry in information versus asymmetry in power: implicit assumptions of agency theory? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(6), pp. 825-840.
Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., and Rahmat, M. M. (2007). Audit committee characteristics and earning management: evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), pp. 147-163.
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2007). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance – Revised 2007. Retrieved January 1, 2009, from http://www.sc.com.my/eng/html/cg/cg2007.pdf
Shamsul, N. A. (2002). Audit committee establishment in Malaysia: Some insights prior to the Asian 1997 financial crisis. Utara Management Review, 3(1), pp. 1-17.
Song, J., and Windram, B. (2000). The effectiveness of audit committee: evidence from UK companies in the post- Cadbury period. Paper presented at British Accounting Association Annual Conference, University of Exeter.
Spira, L. F. (1998). An evolutionary perspective on audit committee effectiveness. Scholarly Research and Theory Papers, 6(1), pp. 29-38.
Spira L. F. (2003). Audit committees: begging the question? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), pp. 180-188.
Standifird, S. S., Pons, F., and Moshavi, D. (2008). Influence Tactics in the classroom and their relationship to student satisfaction. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6 (1), pp. 135-152.
Tjosvold, D., and Sun, H. (2010). Using power to affect performance in China. Effects of employee achievement and social context. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(4), pp. 364-381.
Turley, S., and Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: informal process and behavioral effect. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(5), pp. 765-788.
Nordin, W. H., and Marini, N. H. A. (2009). Audit committee attributes, financial distress and the quality of financial reporting in Malaysia. Retrieved May 3, 2010 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1500134
Wilkes, M. D., and Raven, B. H. (2002). Understanding social influence in medical education. Academic Medicine, 77(6), pp. 481-488.
Williams, Z., and Moore, R. (2007). Supply chain relationships and information capabilities: The creation and use of information power. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(6), pp. 469-483.
In-Text Citation: (San et al., 2012)
To Cite this Article: San, A. N. C., Moorthy, M. K., & Lung, C. K. (2012). Perceived Social Power and Audit Committee Effectiveness in Malaysia: The Conceptual Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 2(1), 189–204.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode