This study aims to discuss the need for instrument development to measure teachers' efficacy in implementing classroom assessment. This study found three conditions for developing teachers' efficacy instrument: to determine teachers' efficacy in implementing classroom assessment, plan teachers' professional development training, and no specific instrument to measure teachers' efficacy in implementing classroom assessment. Therefore, to measure teachers' efficacy in implementing classroom assessment, a comprehensive and up-to-date instrument with higher validity and reliability needs to be developed using the Rasch Measurement Model.
Adhikari, K. P. (2020). Self-efficacy beliefs among school mathematics teachers of Nepal. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(07), 192–204
Aziz, A. A., Masodi, M. S., & Zaharim, A. (2015). Asas model pengukuran Rasch: Pembentukan skala & struktur pengukuran. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Bandura, A. (1997). Theoretical Perspectives: the nature of human agency. In Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (p. 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/SpringerReference_223312
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1(1), 1–40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. In Routledge (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575
Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215587754
Brookhart, S. M. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1002_4
Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5–12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00139.x
Bruun, J., & Evans, R. H. (2020). Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies. Education Sciences, 10(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/edieducsci10030054
Curriculum Development Division. (2018). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) bagi Murid Tahap 1. Ministry of Education
Curriculum Development Division. (2019). GariPanduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) bagi Murid Tahap 1 (2nd ed). Ministry of Education
Dorin, A. D., & Yasin R. M. (2019). Tahap kesediaan guru terhadap pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD). The International Conference of Future Education and Advances (ICOFEA) 2019, 8–15
Fives, H., & Barnes, N. (2020). Navigating the complex cognitive task of classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103063
Ghazali, N. H. C. M., Rabi, N. M., Hassan, N. M., & Wahab, N. A. (2018). A confirmatory factor analysis of classroom assessment practises scale in a Malaysian context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i3/4570
Green, F. (2019). An exploration into the value of formative assessment and the barriers associated with the implementation of formative strategies. In Rethinking teacher education for the 21st century (pp. 203–222). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpb3xhh.17
Hartell, E. (2018). Teachers' self-efficacy in assessment in technology education. In Handbook of Technology Education (pp. 785–800). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5
Isa, A. M., Mydin, A., Abdullah, A. G. K., & Rasidi, W. F. M. (2020). Transformasi pendidikan tahap 1: Peperiksaan ke pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD), kesan terhadap autonomi guru. In Habidin, N.F., Chik, T.W.T., Yong, S.Y.O., Muhammad, U.A., & Fuzi, N.M., Isu dan cabaran dalam pendidikan: Strategi dan inovasi (pp. 218–231). Kaizentrenovation Sdn. Bhd.
Jusoh, W. N. A. S. W., & Mahamod, Z. (2019). Tahap pengetahuan, pelaksanaan dan masalah guru dalam melaksanakan penilaian formatif dalam pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD) Bahasa Melayu Tahap 1. The International Conference of Future Education and Advances (ICOFEA) 2019, 788–795
McMillan, J. H. (2013). Research on classroom assessment and research. Sage Publications
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom assessment: principles and practice that enhance student learning and motivation (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/August 3, 2017
Mokhsein, S. E. (2018). Aplikasi teori respons item dalam penyelidikan. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Noh, N. M., Halili, S. H., & Siraj, S. (2020). Analisis faktor kekangan pembelajaran berasaskan reka bentuk dalam kalangan guru berdasarkan fuzzy delphi method. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 8(1), 33–42.
Russell, K. M., & Airasian, W. P. (2012). Classroom assessment concepts and applications (7th ed). McGraw-Hill
Salleh, M., Sarkowi, A., Jafar, M. F., Arif, Z. M., & Hamid, H. A. (2019). Tahap literasi guru terhadap pendekatan dalam pentaksiran bilik darjah. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN 2019), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Vivian, R., & Falkner, K. (2018). A survey of Australian teachers' self-efficacy and assessment approaches for the K-12 digital technologies curriculum. Computing Education (WiPSCE '18), October 4–6, 2018, Potsdam, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265762
Wolfe, E. W., Viger, S. G., Jarvinen, D. W., & Linksman, J. (2007). Validation of scores from a measure of teachers' efficacy toward standards-aligned classroom assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292091
Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002
In-Text Citation: (Rosli et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Rosli, R., Mokhsein, S. E., & Suppian, Z. (2021). The Need for Instrument Development to Measure Teachers’ Efficacy in Implementing Classroom Assessment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 699–706.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
