Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

An Idea for Compensating Local Farmers for a Sustainable Method of Pineapple Farming

Adrian Daud, Shairil Izwan Taasim, Anita Rosli

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i17/11405

Open access

Agricultural activities have the share in contributing to greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The method of residue burning (RB), which has been practiced in Samarahan, Sarawak in Malaysia contributed to the emission of carbon into the atmosphere. Steps should be taken to address this issue by promoting sustainable method of farming. Pineapple farmers can be given incentives to change to a more sustainable method such as zero burning (ZB) whereby a mechanism like the clean development mechanism (CDM) can be adopted at the local level to encourage farmers adopting this sustainable farming technique. This incentive is primarily derived from the value of carbon sequestered in the soil through the practice of ZB. Although farmer will suffer financial loss due to additional cost, they can be compensated for this loss under ZB. Thus, farmers still can receive better income with the compensation and at the same continuing to practice ZB.

Ahmed, O. H., Husni, M. H. A., Anuar, A. R., & Hanafi, M. M. (2002) Effect of Residue Management Practices on Yield and Economic Viability of Malaysian Pineapple Production. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 20 (4), pp. 83-93.
Albrecht, A., & Kandji, S. T. (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 99, pp.15-27.
Borneo Post Online. (2019). Big Potential for Pineapple Farming in Sarawak. https://manred.sarawak.gov.my/modules/web/pages.php?mod=news&sub=news_view&nid=194
Clarkson, R. (2000). Estimating the Social Cost of Carbon Emissions. London Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions. London: HM Treasury.
Department of Agriculture (DOA). (2005). Perangkaan Pertanian Sarawak 2005. DOA Sarawak.
Hooijer, A., Silvius, M., Wosten, H., & Page, S. (2006). PEAT-CO2 Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in South-East Asia. WL Delft Hydraulics Report Q3943.
Jepsen, M. R. (2006). Above-ground carbon stocks in tropical fallows, Sarawak, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management, 225, 2pp. 87-295.
Jain, N., Bhaitia, A., & Pathak, H. (2014). Emission of Air Pollutants from Crop Residue Burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14: 422–430.
Joshi, D. (2019). Using Carbon Pricing to Support Sustainable Development in Malaysia. Monographs of Penang Institute.
Lal, R. (2001a). Soils and the Greenhouse Effect. In: Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect (eds Lal, R., W.A. Dick, J.M. Bartels), pp. 1-8, Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) Special Publication No. 57, Madison, WI.
Lal, R. (2001b) Myths and Facts About Soils and the Greenhouse Effect. In: Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect (eds Lal, R., W.A. Dick, J.M. Bartels), pp. 9-26, Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) Special Publication No. 57, Madison, WI.
Lal, R. (2001c). The Potential of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystem to Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. In: Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect (eds Lal, R., W.A. Dick, J.M. Bartels), pp. 137-154. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) Special Publication No. 57, Madison, WI., pp.
Liu, X. (2008). The monetary compensation mechanism: An alternative to the clean development mechanism. Ecological Economics, 66, pp. 289-297.
Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M., & Nair, V. D. (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172, pp. 10-23.
O’Connor, D. (2008). Governing the global commons: Linking carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in tropical forests. Global Environmental Change, 18 (3), pp. 368-374.
Pearce, D. (2001). The economic value of forest ecosystem. Ecosystem Health, 7 (4), pp. 284-296.
Py, C., Lacoeuilhe, J. J., & Teissen, C. (1987). The Pineapple Cultivation and Uses. G.P. Maisounneuve et Larose: Paris.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (2001). The Value of Forest Ecosystem, Montreal, SCBD, 67p. (CBD Technical Series no. 4).
Sharma, G., Sharma, L. K., & Sharma, K. C. (2019). Assessment of land use change and its effect on soil carbon stock using multitemporal satellite data in semiarid region of Rajashtan, India. Ecological Processes, 8(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019-0193-5
Tisdell, C. (1999). Conservation farming and indicators of agricultural sustainability. Chapter 5 in Sustainable Agriculture and Environment: Globalisation and the Impact of Trade Liberalisation (eds Dragun, A.K. and Tisdel, C.), pp. 57-78. Edward Elgar: UK.
Tol, R., Fankhauser, S., Richels, R., & Smith, J. (2000), How much damages will climate change do? Recent estimates. World Economics, 1 (4), pp. 179-206.
Unger, P. W. (2001), Total Carbon, Aggregation, Bulk Density, and Penetration Resistance of Cropland and Nearby Grassland Soils. In Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect (eds Lal, R., W.A. Dick, J.M. Bartels), pp. 77-92. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) Special Publication No. 57, Madison, WI.
Zhang, Z. X. (2000). Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms. Faculty of Law and Faculty of Economics, University of Gronigen, mimieo.
Wei, X., Shao, M., Gale, W., & Li, L. (2014). Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Scientific Reports 4, 4062. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04062
Yang, Y., Tilman, D., Furey, G., & Lehman, C. (2019). Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity. Nature Communications 10, 718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08636-w

In-Text Citation: (Daud et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Daud, A., Taasim, S. I., & Rosli, A. (2021). An Idea for Compensating Local Farmers for a Sustainable Method of Pineapple Farming. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(17), 237–245.