Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Corporate Environmental Social Governance and Financial Performance: A Cross-sector Risk Analysis in Malaysia

Nur Syuhada Jasni, Haslinda Yusoff

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11834

Open access

This study contributes to the existing literature on corporate Environmental Social Governance (ESG) by examining the relationship between ESG performance and firm performance. The scope of ESG practices across Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs) in various risk-level industries (i.e., high, medium, and low) is investigated in this study. The resource-based view (RBV) was applied to a sample of pioneer ESG companies with seven years of observations extracted from Bloomberg’s ESG data. The quantitative method employed was panel data, specifically, the seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model and comparison of different levels of risk sectors (high, medium, and low), with the aim of achieving robust results. Based on trend analysis, the medium-risk sectors and governance mean performance exhibited the best achievement in seven years of observation. Tobin's Q demonstrated that the market value and replacement value of physical assets are more reliable indicators of asset utilisation in the medium-risk sector than the ROA. While all PLCs across all industries receive green efforts, medium-risk sectors, such as housebuilders and developers, telecommunications, and consumer goods, are proactive in offering green products and services that directly impact consumers' daily lives. However, there is development potential and an extraordinary opportunity for both high-risk and low-risk industries. Improved planning and a more favourable business climate would enable all industries to widen their ESG objectives. Simultaneously, it is possible to identify and replicate the best practices in medium-risk ESGs to advance and attract investment in these two sectors. This study adds to the existing body of knowledge about the impact of business accountability and responsibility by examining cross-sector risk in Malaysia, a previously unstudied context.

Abdul Wahab, N., Ahmad, N. B., & Yusoff, H. B. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and company financial performance for environmental sensitive companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(15), 115–125.
Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108
Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
Amran, A., Ooi, S. K., Wong, C. Y., & Hashim, F. (2016). Business Strategy for Climate Change: An ASEAN Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1371
Amran, A., Periasamy, V., & Zulkafli, A. H. (2014). Determinants of climate change disclosure by developed and emerging countries in asia pacific. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.539
Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
Buallay, A. (2019a). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
Buallay, A. (2019b). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
Corbett, L. M., & Claridge, G. S. (2002). Key manufacturing capability elements and business performance. International Journal of Production Research, 40(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110073091
D’Amico, E., Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2016). Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1865
Darus, F., Sawani, Y., Mohamed Zain, M., & Janggu, T. (2014). Impediments to CSR assurance in an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2013-0846
Franzese, R. (1996). A Gauss Procedure to Estimate Panel-Corrected Standard Errors with Non-Rectangular and/or Missing Data. The Political Methodologist, 7(2), 2–3.
Fraser, D. A. S., Rekkas, M., & Wong, A. (2005). Highly accurate likelihood analysis for the seemingly unrelated regression problem. Journal of Econometrics, 127(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECONOM.2004.06.001
Galbreath, J. (2005). Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.008
Gerged, A. M., Al-Haddad, L. M., & Al-Hajri, M. O. (2020). Is earnings management associated with corporate environmental disclosure?: Evidence from Kuwaiti listed firms. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2018-0082
Guillamon-Saorin, E., Kapelko, M., & Stefanou, S. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Operational Inefficiency: A Dynamic Approach. Sustainability, 10(7), 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072277
Hassan Che Haat, M., Abdul Rahman, R., & Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(8), 744–778. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810899518
Humphrey, J. E., Lee, D. D., & Shen, Y. (2012). Does it cost to be sustainable? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2012.03.002
Janggu, T., Joseph, C., & Madi, N. (2007). The Current State of Corporate Social Responsibility Among Industrial Companies in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110710835536
Jasni, N. S., & Yusoff, H. (2021). Corporate Environmental Social Governance and Financial Performance: A Cross-sector Risk Analysis in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 956–975.
Jitmaneeroj, B. (2018). A latent variable analysis of corporate social responsibility and firm value. Managerial Finance, 44(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2017-0303
Jos, C., Jabbour, C., & Lopes De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. (2016). Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management: linking two emerging agendas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052
Kweh, Q. L., Alrazi, B., Chan, Y. C., Abdullah, W. M. T. W., & Lee, R. M. A. (2017). Environmental, social and governance and the efficiency of government-linked companies in Malaysia. Institutions and Economies, 9(2), 55–73.
Longoni, A., & Cagliano, R. (2018). Inclusive environmental disclosure practices and firm performance: The role of green supply chain management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(9), 1815–1835. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2016-0728
Lu, L. W., & Taylor, M. E. (2018). A study of the relationships among environmental performance, environmental disclosure, and financial performance. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2016-0010
Md Nor, N., Shaiful Bahari, N. A., Adnan, N. A., Sheh Kamal, S. M. Q. A., & Mohd Ali, I. (2016). The Effects of Environmental Disclosure on Financial Performance in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00016-2
Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Gonçalves, L. M. V. (2018). The Value Relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Brazilian Case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030574
Mukherjee, A., & Nuñez, R. (2018). Doing well by doing good: can voluntary CSR reporting enhance financial performance? Journal of Indian Business Research, 11(2), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2018-0199
Nik Ahmad, N. N., & Mohamad, N. A. (2014). Environmental Disclosures by the Malaysian Construction Sector: Exploring Extent and Quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(4), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1322
Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.366
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/257052
S&P Global Ratings. (2019). The ESG Risk Atlas: Sector And Regional Rationales And Scores What Is The ESG Risk Atlas? What Can It Do? The ESG Risk Atlas: Sector And Regional Rationales And Scores.
Sadou, A., Alom, F., & Laluddin, H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosures in Malaysia: evidence from large companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2016-0104
Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2019). Performance relevance of environmental and social disclosures: The role of foreign ownership. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0114
Sawani, Y., Mohamed Zain, M., & Darus, F. (2010). Preliminary insights on sustainability reporting and assurance practices in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011083482
Shakil, M. H., Mahmood, N., Tasnia, M., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6), 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2018-0155
Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635
Yusoff, H., Yatim, N., & Nasir, N. M. (2005). Analysis on the development of environmental disclosure practices by selected Malaysian companies from 1999 to 2002. Malaysian Accounting Review, 4(1), 48–73.
Zabri, S. M., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. K. (2016). Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance: Evidence from Top 100 Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00036-8
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589

In-Text Citation: (Jasni & Yusoff, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Jasni, N. S., & Yusoff, H. (2021). Corporate Environmental Social Governance and Financial Performance: A Cross-sector Risk Analysis in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 956–975.