ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Malaysia's education system has taken action to implement Malaysia's Education Development Plan 2015-2025 in response to the needs of the latest economic and educational revolution. The plan emphasises critical thinking abilities and STEM knowledge as key factors. However, an assessment approach that does not contain both parts is one factor contributing to the plan's lack of accessibility. Bloom's taxonomy is presented as a technique for determining the level of difficulty of assessment in STEM disciplines. One of the statistics courses was chosen to represent STEM. An essential approach has been implemented, which includes a qualitative method. The quality of an assessment question can be determined using a document analysis technique that involves reviewing a collection of question items, as well as revising Bloom's guidelines, verbs, and taxonomy descriptions for the course.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., P.W., A., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Arievitch, I. M. (2020). The Vision of Developmental Teaching and Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100274.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives – Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain. London: Longman.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Dunham, B., Yapa, G., & Yu, E. (2015). Calibrating the Difficulty of an Assessment Tool: The Blooming of a Statistics Examination. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(3).
Fleckenstein, J., Leucht, M., Pant, H. A., & Köller, O. (2016). Proficient Beyond Borders: Assessing Non-native Speakers in a Native Speakers’ Framework. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(1).
Grundspenkis, J. (2019). Intelligent Knowledge Assessment Systems: Myth or Reality. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 315, 31-46.
Koretsky, M., Keeler, J., Ivanovitch, J., & Cao, Y. (2018). The Role of Pedagogical Tools in Active Learning: a Case for Sense-making. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1).
Talib, M. A., Alomary, F. O., & Alwadi, H. F. (2018). Assessment of Student Performance for Course Examination Using Rasch Measurement Model: A Case Study of Information Technology Fundamentals Course. Education Research International, 2018, 1–8.
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Major Theories and Frameworks That Influence the Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Mathematics: a Comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895-920.
Sagala, P. N., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 1–13.
Tai, J., Dawson, P., Panadero, E., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2017). Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions About the Quality of Work. Higher Education, 467–481.
Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Stein, M. K. (2017). A Framework for Planning and Facilitating Video-based Professional Development. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 28.
Watan, S., & Sugiman. (2018). Exploring the Relationship Between Teachers’ Instructional and Students’ Geometrical Thinking Levels Based on Van Hiele Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1).
Whitney, B. M., Cheng, Y., Brodersen, A. S., & Hong, M. R. (2018). The Scale of Student Engagement in Statistics: Development and Initial Validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(5), 553-565.
Zulkifli, F., Abidin, R. Z., & Mohamed, Z. (2019). Evaluating the quality of exam questions: A multidimensional item response. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 11), 606–612.
In-Text Citation: (Zulkifli & Abidin, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Zulkifli, F., & Abidin, R. Z. (2022). A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Essential Approach to Constructing Assessment Questions for the Probability and Statistics Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(3), 588–602.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode