ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study focuses on the components of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Inventive Skills (IS) among secondary school Malay language teachers in Malaysia. TPACK is eight elements related to teacher knowledge to integrate technology, pedagogy and content components in a subject. Meanwhile, IS is a skill dimension that needs to be mastered by Malay language teachers in Malaysia. IS marks one of the most important parts of 21st century skills. Malay language teachers need to be sensitive to every transformation in the national education system in order to be in line with current needs. Therefore, this study tries to analyze the influence of TPACK components on IS among Malay language teachers. This study uses a survey research design and the study sample consists of 400 Malay language teachers of national secondary schools in Malaysia who were selected using a stratified random sampling technique. This study conducted Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis through SmartPLS 3.0 software. Overall, these eight components of TPACK can be important predictors of IS among Malay language teachers. In addition, this study also provides a clear picture to all Malay language teachers in Malaysia regarding proactive measures to master TPACK and IS components comprehensively. The knowledge and teaching skills possessed by teachers will develop in line with their experience in the national education system. Therefore, TPACK components, namely technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, content knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, technological content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, technological pedagogical content knowledge and contextual knowledge will be able to further highlight the teacher's IS during the teaching and facilitation process in the classroom especially among Malay language teachers in Malaysia.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103 (3): 411.
Aslan, A., & Chang, Z. (2016). Influencing factors and integration of ICT into teaching practices of pre-service and starting teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2 (2): 359-370.
Ball, D. L., Thomas, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of teacher education. http://www.personal.umich.edu [14 Julai 2021].
Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47: 47-61.
Hasbullah, F., & Mahamod, Z. (2017). Penerapan pemikiran inventif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu murid sekolah rendah. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Serantau Ke-VIII, 46-54.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research: 382-388.
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. SAGE Publications.
Hamzah, M. (2020). Sedia hadapi kelas maya sesuai normal baharu. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2020/04/679003/sedia-hadapi-kelas-maya-sesuainormal-baharu.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hew, Khe Foon & Brush, Thomas. (2007). Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 (3): 223-252.
Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2011). Innovative teaching and learning research: Findings and implications.wnload/c/4/5c45eb9d776854afdhttp://download.microsoft.com/download/c/4/5c45eb9d776854afd85b3dc66f09277ab/itlresearch2011findigs.pdf (diakses pada 23 November 2021).
Jain, C., Nor, M. M., Othman, A. J., & Abdul Rahman, M. N. (2018). Isu pengetahuan kandungan, pedagogi dan teknologi dalam kalangan guru prasekolah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6 (1): 7-21.
Chee, J. L. S., & Rosli, R. B. (2020). Pengetahuan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi guru matematik sekolah rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5 (11): 71-84.
Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B. & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30: 199-218.
Akun, J. C. A. (2019). Pengetahuan teknologi pedagogi kandungan guru Sains sekolah menengah. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Sains Kognitif dan Pembangunan Manusia. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for educators. New York: Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Dlm. Teachers college record, 108 (6), 1017-1054. http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/OtherPag [13 September 2021].
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611.
Ab Majid, M. R. (2017). Pengetahuan teknologi pedagogi kandungan dan kreativiti pengajaran dalam kalangan guru Bahasa Arab di Malaysia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.
Anwar, M. Q. (2018). Tahap perbezaan pengetahuan, sikap dan amalan menggunakan enam topi pemikiran berdasarkan jantina dan pengkhususan dalam kalangan guru Bahasa Melayu sekolah kebangsaan. Kertas Projek Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
NCREL & Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: literacy in the digital age. www.ncrel.org/engauge [14 Oktober 2021].
Omar, N. (2015). Amalan guru Pendidikan Islam berfokuskan kepelbagaian budaya murid: Kajian kes di negeri Sarawak. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Osman, H. (2020). Carian ‘Google Classroom’ tertinggi, bukti guru kita rajin. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2020/04/678951/carian-google-classroom-tertinggibukti-guru-kita-rajin.
Pella, S. (2015). Pedagogical reasoning and action: Affordances of practice-based teacher professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42 (3): 81-101.
Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), Volume 36, No. 1, pp. iii-xiv, March 2012, Available at SSRN : https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176426.
Makmun, R., & Mahamod, Z. (2015). Teknologi pedagogi dan pengetahuan kandungan profesionalisme guru Kesusasteraan Melayu. Brunei: Akhbar Printing & Trading Company.
Rahman, S., & Mahamod, Z. (Pnyt.). (2018). Inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran: Mengoptimumkan pembelajaran pelajar. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2): 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1): 1-22.
Talirkodi. (2016). Hubungan motivasi guru dengan penggunaan ICT dalam pengajaran di SJK (T) daerah Kuala Muda Yan. Proceeding of ICECRS, 1: 1043-1054 ISSN. 2548-6160 International Seminar on Generating Knowledge Through Research, UUM-UMSIDA, 25-27 October 2016, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Available online: http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/icecrs Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.647.
Wachira, P., & Keengwe. J. (2010). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal SciEducTechnol, 20: 17-25.
Eng, Y. C., & Keong, C. T. (2019). Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi Kandungan di Malaysia: Satu kajian meta analisis. Journal of ICT in Education (JICTIE), 6, 86–95.
In-Text Citation: (Kusaini et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Kusaini, E. A., Mahamod, Z., & Mohammad, W. M. R. W. (2022). Integration of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components and Inventive Skills among Malay Language Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 25–38.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode