ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
COVID-19 pandemic’s movement control order has forced leading public universities in Malaysia to switch their conventional face-to-face lectures to online distance learning. Having less contact with classmates and lecturer, group work to fulfil coursework assessment requires learners adapting themselves to this “new normal” in higher education studies. Maintaining good group work dynamics could be challenging due to distance and conflicts. Therefore, this study aimed to discover concerning issues in online group work using Tuckman’s Model. Using a quantitative research approach, this study distributes questionnaires at the end of the semester using Google Forms to purposely select 116 respondents from a public university in Malaysia. These students have been involved in group work for their online distance learning since 2020. The data later were analysed using SPSS and results were presented as mean scores for every research question. The results show teaching presence (mean score = 4.2) is crucial to building students’ understanding in the forming stage of group work. In the second stage of storming and norming group work, social presence (mean score = 3.8) is highly favourable by students rather than working alone to ensure interactivity, communication and collaboration within the group. The findings also indicated that in the later stage of performing, cognitive presence (mean score = 4.3) was found to have direct positive impacts on online group work. Students are braver to speak up and defend their ideas in online group work discussions. Despite challenges in group work distance learning, learners could adapt to the new normal in higher learning education studies. Changes and coping strategies are needed to address the findings of this research to improve teaching and learning pedagogy in this post-COVID-19 era. Future research may explore teachers' insights of online group work and cover respondents from cross faculty clusters. Learners’ perceptions could also be explored qualitatively.
Aderibigbe, S. A. (2021) Can Online Discussions Facilitate deep learning for students in General Education, Heliyon, Vol 7(3) , pp 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06414
Aquino, J. F., Riss, R. R., Multerer, S. M., Mogilner, L. N., & Turner, T. L. (2022). A step-by-step guide for mentors to facilitate team building and communication in virtual teams. Medical Education Online, 27(1), 2094529.
Sadaf, A., Wu, T., & Martin, F. (2021). Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research from 2000 to 2019. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100050
Bayne, L., Birt, J., Hancock, P., Schonfeldt, N., & Agrawal, P. (2022). Best practices for group assessment tasks. Journal of Accounting Education, 59, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100770
Camarero, C., Rodriguez, J., and San Jose, R. (2012). An exploratory study of online forums as a collaborative learning tool. Online Information Review, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 568-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254077
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Flaherty, H. B. (2022). Using Collaborative Group Learning Principles to Foster Community in Online Classrooms. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 42(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2021.2013390
Gottipati, S., Shankararaman, V., Gokarn, M. N. (2020). Automated discussion analysis-framework for knowledge analysis from class discussions. In: 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, PP. 1-8.
Jones, D. (2019). The Tuckman’s Model Implementation, Effect, and Analysis & the New Development of Jones LSI Model on a Small Group. Journal of Management, 6(4).
Kaur, S., Bir, M., Chandran, D. S., & Deepak, K. K. (2021). Adaptive strategies to conduct participant-centric structured virtual group discussions for postgraduate students in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in physiology education, 45(1), 37-43.
Kay, D. (2018). Being There" Being There"-Building Productive Academic Teams across Distance and Over Time. Journal of Regional Medical Campuses, 1(2).
Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955
Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students' social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2).
Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student Perceptions of Groupwork in an Online Course: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 69–92. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/477
Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2019). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 539-560.
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical education online, 24(1), 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
Mawaddah, S., Asiah, A., Nissa, K., & Putri, U. N. (2022). Collaborative Group Work in Online Learning: The Contribution of Student’s Self-Regulation and Emotion Regulation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Science Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2021.2317280
Mouratidis, K., & Papagiannakis, A. (2021). COVID-19, internet, and mobility: The rise of telework, telehealth, e-learning, and e-shopping. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103182.
Rahmat, N. H., Aripin, N., Razlan, Z., Arepin, M., Mohandas, E. S., & Sim, M. S. (2021). Analysing the Cadence of Group Conflicts across Gender during Online Learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, Vol 6(2) pp 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3886
Rahmat, N. H. ( 2020). Conflict Resolution Strategies in Class Discussions. International Journal of Education, Vol 12(3), pp 49066. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.16914
Rezaei, A. (2017). Features of Successful Group Work in Online and Physical Courses. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(3), 5-22. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol17_3/rezaei.pdf
Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127-135.
Roberts, T. S., & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(4), 257–268.
Salmon, G. (2021). Five stage model for online learning. Gilly Salmon.com. https://www.gillysalmon.com/five-stage-model.html
Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
Sim, M. S., Sukimin, I. S., Abidin, N. S. Z., Rahmat, N. H., Anyau, E., & Varma, S. B. (2020). Conflicts in Group Work: Are they all Bad? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 331 - 341. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11246
Siregar, C., Pane, M. M., & Ruman, Y. S. (2018). The virtual team performance in solving teamwork conflict problems. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 1-5).
Skolnik, S., & Skolnik, L. (2022). Beyond challenges: Opportunities for enhancing group work field education. Social Work with Groups, 45(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2021.1981515
Stafford, V. (2021). Using Google shared files to facilitate successful online student group collaboration. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 4(1), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2021.4.1.21
Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and 'teacher-presence': Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146-169.
Timmo D. (2020). Online Group Work: Barriers and Challenges. Instructional Resources Center for Teaching, Learning & Mentoring. Retrieved from https://kb.wisc.edu/instructional-resources/page.php?id=104624
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
Zaharuddin, A. M. binti, Almuddin, A., Ammar, A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Exploring Group Dynamics in The Arabic Classroom Using Tucker’s Development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(6), 1576-1599. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i6/13188
In-Text Citation: (Rick et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Rick, A. M. M., Mohd, W. N. H. W., Rahman, M. A., Sukiman, S. A., Mokhtar, R., & Katawazai, R. (2022). Exploring Online Group Work Using Tuckman’s Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 187 – 205.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode