ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
In Malaysia, the native customary rights of the indigenous people, known as the 'Orang Asli', are rather broad, including fishing, hunting, and foraging that flow from site-specific occupation and livelihood. However, in the modern era, despite the protection of the old pre-independence legislation, the Aboriginal Peoples Act of 1954, the aborigines' exercise of such rights appears to be problematic as the more recent legislations, such as the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, invoke several restrictions on fishing or hunting in the forest areas occupied by the aborigines. Additionally, most local literature mainly focuses on the aborigines' land rights; consequently, hunting rights have remained under-researched. Given the dearth of academic research on this right, this paper examines how the 2010 Act infringes on the aborigines' hunting rights and, broadly, their traditional way of life. This paper adopts a qualitative research methodology, employing a doctrinal content analysis that would provide a subterranean understanding of the tension between the legal protection of wildlife and the aborigines' rights in Malaysia. The findings revealed that the native rights and social interests of the aborigines are mainly ignored, overlooked and appear to be superseded by the interests of wildlife animals.
REFERENCES
Aziz, S. A., Clements, G. R., Rayan, D. M., & Sankar, P. (2013). Why conservationists should be concerned about natural resource legislation affecting indigenous peoples’ rights: Lessons from Peninsular Malaysia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(3), 639-656. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0432-5.
Carey, I. (1976). Orang Asli: The Aboriginal tribes of Peninsular Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.
Cretois, B., Linnell, J. D., Kaltenborn, B. P., & Trouwborst, A. (2019). What form of human-wildlife coexistence is mandated by legislation? A comparative analysis of international and National Instruments. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(7), 1729-1741. doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01751-6
Fernández-Llamazares, Á, Lepofsky, D., Lertzman, K., Armstrong, C. G., Brondizio, E. S., Gavin, M. C., . . . Vaughan, M. B. (2021). Scientists' warning to humanity on threats to indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems. Journal of Ethnobiology, 41(2). doi:10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.144
Gomes, A. G. (2004). Looking for money: Capitalism and modernity in an orang asli village. Melbourne, Australia: Trans Pacific Press.
Idrus, R. (2011). The discourse of protection and the Orang Asli in Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 29(1), 53–74.
Jacobsen, J. B., Lundhede, T. H., & Thorsen, B. J. (2012). Valuation of wildlife populations above survival. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(2), 543-563. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0200-3
Kasmo, M. A. (2003). Development process analysis of water shortages and their impact on future water supplies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 14(4), 477-487. doi:10.1108/14777830310488694
Kideghesho, J. R. (2016). Reversing the trend of wildlife crime in Tanzania: Challenges and opportunities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(3), 427-449. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1069-y
Kimbrough, L. (2013, July 22). Weak laws governing Malaysia's indigenous people complicate conservation efforts. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from https://news.mongabay.com/2013/07/weak-laws-governing-malaysias-indigenous-people-complicate-conservation-efforts/
Murali, K. (2004). Marginal Worker Force and forest cover change in India. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 443-449. doi:10.1108/14777830410540171
Nicholas, C. (2010). How Selangor won over the Orang Asli. Human Rights Documents Online. doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1184-0443
Noor, M. N. (2022). Promoting sustainable timber harvesting through National Forestry Act 1984. Asian Journal of Law and Governance. doi:10.55057/ajlg.2022.4.1.3
Ntuli, H., Jagers, S. C., Linell, A., Sjöstedt, M., & Muchapondwa, E. (2019). Factors influencing local communities’ perceptions towards conservation of Transboundary Wildlife Resources: The case of the great limpopo trans-frontier conservation area. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(11), 2977-3003. doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01809-5
Orang Asli Department. (2020, November 29). Suku Kaum. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from https://www.jakoa.gov.my/orang-asli/suku-kaum/
Sandran, L. (2022). Digital ethnography among Orang Asli community at Kampung Orang Asli of Malaysia. Practices, Challenges, and Prospects of Digital Ethnography as a Multidisciplinary Method, 61-77. doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4190-9.ch005
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London, England: SAGE.
Skibins, J. C., Powell, R. B., & Hallo, J. C. (2013). Charisma and conservation: Charismatic megafauna’s influence on Safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(4), 959-982. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z
Subramaniam, Y. (2010). Orang Asli struggle for customary lands continues. Human Rights Documents Online. doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-1184-0414
Subramaniam, Y., & Nicholas, C. (2018). The courts and the restitution of indigenous territories in Malaysia. Erasmus Law Review, 11(1), 67-79. doi:10.5553/elr.000096
Suzuki, N., & Parker, K. L. (2016). Potential conflict between future development of natural resources and high-value wildlife habitats in boreal landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25(14), 3043-3073. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1219-2
Taylor, W. A., Child, M. F., Lindsey, P. A., Nicholson, S. K., Relton, C., & Davies-Mostert, H. T. (2021). South Africa’s private wildlife ranches protect globally significant populations of wild ungulates. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(13), 4111-4135. doi:10.1007/s10531-021-02294-5
United Nations Permanent Forum. (n.d.). Who are indigenous peoples? United Nations. Retrieved August 1, 2022, from https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf
Weinlein, E. (2017). Indigenous people, development and environmental justice: Narratives of the Dayak people of Sarawak, Malaysia. EnviroLab Asia, 1(1), 1-8. doi:10.5642/envirolabasia.20170101.06
Wood, S. (2021). Indigenous rights under the Federal Constitution. Malayan Law Journal, 2, 1–17.
Wook, I. (2015). The Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 and the recognition of Orang Asli land rights. UUM Journal of Legal Studies. doi:10.32890/uumjls.6.2015.4587
List of Cases
Adong b Kuwau & Ors v Kerajaan Negeri Johor & Anor [1997] 1 MLJ 418.
Alexkor Ltd v Richtersveld Community (2003) 12 BCLR 130).
Amodu Tijani v The Secretary Southern Nigeria [1921] 2 AC 399).
Calder v A-G (British Columbia) [1973] SCR 313).
Kerajaan Negeri Selangor & Ors v Sagong Bin Tasi & Ors [2005] 6 MLJ 289).
Koperasi Kijang Mas v Kerajaan Negeri Perak [1991] CLJ 486.
Mabo & Ors v State of Queensland (No. 2) (1992) 107 ALR.
Mabo No 2 (Mabo & Ors v State of Queensland & Anor (1986) 64 ALR 1).
Nor Anak Nyawai & 3 Ors v Borneo Pulp Plantation Sdn Bhd & 2 Ors [2001] 2 AMR 2222; [2001] 6 MLJ 241
The Wik Peoples v The State of Queensland & Ors (1996) 187 CLR 1).
List of Statutes
Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954.
Laws of Malaysia Federal Constitution.
Wildlife Conservation Act 2010
In-Text Citation: (Hussain et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Hussain, F., Hamin, Z., Ariffin, N. I., Alang, K., Rahmat, N. E., & Zain, N. R. M. (2022). Wildlife Hunting Rights of the Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia: A Dilemma Protecting Humans or Animals? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 1434 – 1442.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode