Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

The Impact of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility in Enhancing Competitive Advantage

Asma Syed, Kartinah Ayupp, Khairil Annuar Mohd Kamal

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i4/16457

Open access

Purpose: The aim of this research is to review research on competitive advantage. This study also reviews the dimensions through which internal corporate social responsibility can contribute towards enhancing the competitive advantage. Employee well-being as a dimension of internal corporate social responsibility is reviewed. This study elucidates the research gaps and potential relationships that may explain this theoretical framework.
Design/ Methodology: This study reviewed the literature for the variables of competitive advantage, and internal corporate social responsibility for the last 15 years in management and organizational studies. This review helps identify the gaps that might help explain the further study. Findings: This competitive advantage review, ICSR, creates a gap that is critical to organizations. This demonstrates that organizations engage in ICSR activities based on social exchange theory and a resource-based view that differentiates them from their competitors, leading to an improvement in competitive advantage.
Research Limitations: This research limitation is that only studies conducted within the past 15 years on internal corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage are considered. This study ignores the other variables that can increase competitive advantage in an organization. Another limitation of this review was it considers only studies that used the survey methods. Practical Implications: This review demonstrates that an organization-level policy can be developed to improve the internal social responsibility capabilities of companies as this is a reality as a competitive advantage can now no longer be gained through marketing the products. Originality/ Value: This is the first review that considers employee well-being as an important determinant of internal corporate social responsibility that can be used to enhance the competitive advantage of the firms. This review focuses on the studies that are conducted in the last 15 years around internal corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International journal of management reviews, 11(1), 29-49.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27(6), 643-650.
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86.
Bakotic, D. (2016). Relationship between job satisfaction and organizational
performance. Economic Research – EkonomskaIstraživanja, 29(1), 118-130.
Chan, T. J., & Hasan, M. N. A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility practices
from the employees’ perspective: A case of Malaysian higher education
institution. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 8(4), 132-153.
Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business ethics: A European review, 16(1), 19-33.
De Roeck, K., Marique, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Swaen, V. (2014). Understanding employees' responses to corporate social responsibility: mediating roles of overall justice and organisational identification. The international journal of human resource management, 25(1), 91-112.
Dogl, C., & Holtbrugge, D. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility, employer reputation and employee commitment: An empirical study in developed and emerging economies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1739-1762.
Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of business ethics, 125, 563-580.
Gao, J. H. (2019). Examining corporate social responsibility and employee
engagement in Macao. International Journal of Business and Management,
12(3), 1380-1402.
Gond, J. P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person?centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225-246.
Hofman, P. S., & Newman, A. (2014). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(5), 631-652.
Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Swain, S. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. Journal of marketing, 78(3), 20-37.
Li, Y., Peng, M. W. (2008). Developing Theory from Strategic Management Research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 563–572
Mueller, K., Hattrup, K., Spiess, S. O., & Lin-Hi, N. (2012). The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees' affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of applied psychology, 97(6), 1186.
Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource?based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic management journal, 28(2), 121-146.
Obrad, C., & Gherhe?, V. (2018). A human resources perspective on responsible
corporate behavior. Case study: The multinational companies in western
Romania.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.
Selznick, P. (1957). Law and the Structures of Social Action.
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource?based perspective. Strategic management journal, 22(10), 907-934.
Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of business ethics, 85, 411-427.
Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of business ethics, 77, 159-172.
Zameer, H., Wang, Y., Yasmeen, H., Mofrad, A. A., & Waheed, A. (2018). Corporate image and customer satisfaction by virtue of employee engagement. Human Systems Management, 37(2), 233-248.
Zhao, T., & Xiao, X. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial constraints: Does the life cycle stage of a firm matter? International Review of Economics & Finance, 63, 76-93.
Zhao, Z., Meng, F., He, Y., & Gu, Z. (2019). The influence of corporate social responsibility on competitive advantage with multiple mediations from social capital and dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 11(1), 218.
Zhou, Z., Luo, B. N., & Tang, T. L. P. (2017). Corporate social responsibility excites ‘exponential’ positive employee engagement: The Matthew effect in CSR and sustainable policy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 339-354.
Zhu, Q., Yin, H., Liu, J., & Lai, K. H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1), 28-40.

In-Text Citation: (Syed et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Syed, A., Ayupp, K., & Kamal, K. A. M. (2023). The Impact of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility in Enhancing Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4), 1852 – 1862.