ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of public communication behavior and to analyse the influence factors of communication behavior on public health emergencies. The study reviews the previous literature on public communication behavior and the influence factors of communication behavior during health emergencies and proposes a conceptual model of public communication behavior in health emergencies. The findings of this study demonstrate that the factors influencing public communication behavior during health emergencies can be broadly classified into four categories, risk perception, emotion, public recognition, and motivation. The proposed conceptual model of public communication behavior provides a theoretical integrated overview to understand the relationships between these factors and public communication behavior in health emergencies. Furthermore, this study analyses public communication behavior from the public's internal communication perspective, which has not been adequately explored in previous research. The literature review adds to the body of knowledge by introducing four main groups of factors affecting communication behavior during health emergencies and highlights the importance of understanding the factors that influence communication behavior to improve communication effectiveness. This study is significant for understanding public health information communication behavior in health emergencies and providing government and organisations with high-quality guidance.
Bae, S. Y., & Chang, P. J. (2021). The effect of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) risk perception on behavioural intention towards ‘untack’ tourism in South Korea during the first wave of the pandemic (March 2020). Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 1017-1035.
Becker, M. H., & Maiman, L. A. (1975). Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Medical care, 13(1), 10-24.
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of marketing research, 32(2), 192-203.
Bremser, K., Crowley-Cyr, L., Abraham, V., Moreno-Martin, M. J., & Carreno, M. (2022). Application of the health belief model to explain public perceptions, travel intentions and actions during COVID-19: a sequential transformative design. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 5(5), 865-885.
Bults, & Beaujean. (2011). Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioral responses of the general public during the early phase of the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys. BMC public health, 11, 2.
Chen, G. L. (2007). Involvement theory and its measurement. Commercial Times, 3, 69-71.
Chi, N. T. K. (2022). Environmentally responsible behaviour in outdoor recreation: the moderating impact of COVID-19 related risk perception. Journal of Tourism Futures.
Chou, S. F., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., Yu, T. Y., & Kuo, Y. T. (2022). Identifying the critical factors for sustainable marketing in the catering: The influence of big data applications, marketing innovation, and technology acceptance model factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 11-21.
Deng, Z., Liu, S. (2017). Understanding Consumer Health Information-seeking Behavior from the Perspective of the Perceived Risk Attitude Framework and Social Support in Mobile Social Media Websites. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 105, 98-109?
Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., Van Der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D., & Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of risk research, 23(7-8), 994-1006.
Fissi, S., Gori, E., & Romolini, A. (2022). Social media government communication and stakeholder engagement in the era of Covid-19: evidence from Italy. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. Public relations research: An international perspective, 3, 48.
Jeong, M., Kim, K., Ma, F., & DiPietro, R. (2022). Key factors driving customers’ restaurant dining behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(2), 836-858.
Khozaei, F., Kim, M. J., Nematipour, N., & Ali, A. (2021). The impact of perceived risk and disease prevention efficiency on outdoor activities and avoidance behaviors in the urban parks during COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of Facilities Management, 19(5), 553-568.
Kim, J. N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120-149?
Kwok, K. O., Li, K. K., Chan, H. H. H., Yi, Y. Y., Tang, A., Wei, W. I., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2020). Community responses during early phase of COVID-19 epidemic, Hong Kong. Emerging infectious diseases, 26(7), 1575.
Li, M.Z. (2012). Analysis on perceived risk and information dissemination mechanism of public health emergencies. News knowledge, 11, 30-32.
Li, Y., Wang, X., Lin, X., & Hajli, M. (2018). Seeking and sharing health information on social media: A net valence model and cross-cultural comparison. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 28-40.
Li, Z. F., Fang, X. Z., & Liu, L. (2017). The situational factors influencing public communicative behavior: The perspective of situational theory of problem-solving. Journalism Bimonthly, 2, 73-82?
Luolin, Z. X., Liaoxin, & Tingqian, Y. (2020). Disease cognition, coping style and exercise behavior among the public during novel coronavirus epidemic: an online survey. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 156-159.
Godovykh, M., Pizam, A., & Bahja, F. (2021). Antecedents and outcomes of health risk perceptions in tourism, following COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism Review, 76(4), 737-748.
Mata, F., Martins, P. S., Lopes-Silva, J. B., Mansur-Alves, M., Saeri, A., Grundy, E., Slattery, P., & Smith, L. (2021). Age and education moderate the relationship between confidence in health and political authorities and intention to adopt COVID-19 health-protective behaviours. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.
McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. Sage Publications, Inc.
Neuwirth, K., Dunwoody, S., & Griffin, R. J. (2000). Protection motivation and risk communication. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 721-734.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Science & Business Media.
Praveen, S. V., Ittamalla, R., & Deepak, G. (2021). Analyzing the attitude of Indian citizens towards COVID-19 vaccine–A text analytics study. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 15(2), 595-599.
Qin, S., Zhou, M., & Ding, Y. (2021). Risk perception measurement and influencing factors of COVID-19 in medical college students. Frontiers in public health, 9, 774572.
Suplico-Jeong, L., Bautista Jr, R. A., Guillen Jr, N. B., & Murad, N. S. (2022). Adherence to quarantine protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19: the mediating effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 366-379.
Thanh, P. T., & Tung, L. T. (2022). Can risk communication in mass media improve compliance behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(11/12), 909-925.
Thanh, P. T., & Tung, L. T. (2022). Do government activities increase public compliance in the Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from Vietnam. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
Wangqiong, C. H., Huwei, & Yijing, Q. (2021). Relationships between the public risk perception and rumor spreading behavior during COVID-19: The sequential mediating role of anxiety and information-gathering addiction. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(4), 794-798.
Biao, X., Shiwei, Z., Hongqian, G., & Anqin, Z. (2020). Research on the Mechanism Behind the Influence of the Degree of Public Epidemic Prevention and Control Perceptions on Compliance Behavior——Theoretical and Empirical Analyses Based on COVID-19. China Public Administration Review, 4, 24-49.
Lingyi, Z., & Tiefeng, L. (2021). Public risk perception and preventive behavior of new coronary pneumonia epidemic from the perspective of information. Fudan Public Administration Review, 1, 123-147.
In-Text Citation: (Liu et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Liu, J., Hashim, N. B., Zainudin, S. S. B. S., & Razi, S. A. B. H. M. (2023). The Influencing Factors of Public Communication Behavior for Public Health Emergencies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 948 – 959.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode