Integrating TAM and UGT to Explore Motivations of using Social Media for News Reading among Chinese College Students

Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883-900.
Al-Ghaith, W. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand social networking sites (SNS) usage: Impact of perceived social capital. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 7(4), 105-117.
Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2020). Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4961-5002.
Aydin, G. (2021). Examining social commerce intentions through the uses and gratifications theory. In Research Anthology on Strategies for Using Social Media as a Service and Tool in Business (pp. 1203-1232). IGI Global.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Camilleri, M. A. (2020). The online users’ perceptions toward electronic government services. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(2), 221-235.
Camilleri, M. A., & Falzon, L. (2021). Understanding motivations to use online streaming services: integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the uses and gratifications theory (UGT). Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 25(2), 217-238.
Chen, Y. (2017). WeChat use among Chinese college students: Exploring gratifications and political engagement in China. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 10(1), 25- 43.
Chen, Y. (2020). An investigation of the influencing factors of Chinese WeChat users’ environmental information-sharing behavior based on an integrated model of UGT, NAM, and TPB. Sustainability, 12(7), 2710.
Chung, C., & Austria, K. (2010). Social Media Gratification and Attitude toward Social Media Marketing Messages: A Study of the Effect of Social Media Marketing Messages on Online Shopping Value. Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association.
CNNIC. (2022). The 46th "Statistical Report on Internet Development in China". http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-09/29/c_1602939909285141.htm.
Collin, P., Swist, T., McCormack, J., & Third, A. (2015). Social media and the wellbeing of children and young people: A literature review.
Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
Dhir, A., Chen, S., and Nieminen, M. (2016), “The effects of demographics, technology accessibility, and unwillingness to communicate in predicting internet gratifications and heavy internet use among adolescents”, Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 278-297.
Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing construct validity and reliability: Pilot testing of a qualitative interview for research in Takaful (Islamic insurance). The qualitative report, 21(3), 521-529.
Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of strategic marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.
Gan, C. (2016). Gratifications for using social media: A comparative analysis of Sina Weibo and WeChat in China. Information Development, 34(2), 139-147.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2015). Adult learners' intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 381-390.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325-344.
Hou, J., Ndasauka, Y., Pan, X., Chen, S., Xu, F., & Zhang, X. (2018). Weibo or WeChat? Assessing preference for social networking sites and role of personality traits and psychological factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(4), Article 545.
Huang, H.-Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computer in human behaviour, 57, 122-132.
Joo, J., and Sang, Y. (2013), “Exploring Koreans’ smart phone usage: an integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 2512-2518.
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., and Kim, N. H. (2018), “Examination of relationships among students’ self determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs”, Computers and Education, Vol. 122, pp. 260-272.
Karimi, L., Khodabandelou, R., Ehsani, M., & Ahmad, M. (2014). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to compare higher education students’ motivation for using social networking sites: Experiences from Iran, Malaysia, United Kingdom, and South Africa. Contemporary educational technology, 5(1), 53-72.
Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Chen, S., Malibari, A., and Almotairi, M. (2020), “Why do people purchase virtual goods? A uses and gratification (U&G) theory perspective”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 53.
Kuoppamaki, S. M., Taipale, S., and Wilska, T. A. (2017), “The use of mobile technology for online shopping and entertainment among older adults in Finland”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 110-117.
Kwon, S. J., Park, E., & Kim, K. J. (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 534-544.
Lee, W., Xiong, L., & Hu, C. (2012). The effect of Facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: Applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 819-827.
Liu, C.-J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model to examine seniors’ attitudes toward Facebook. International Journal of Educational Pedagogical Sciences, 8(6), 1012- 1017.
Malik, A., Dhir, A., and Nieminen, M. (2016), “Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 129-138.
Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14, 81-95.
McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people’s lives. New media & society, 8(1), 73-95.
Nagy, J. T. (2018), “Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 160-184.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use, Computers & Education, 109, 56-73.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pang, H. (2018c). Understanding domestic social media use among Chinese college students under the framework of uses and gratifications. Studies in Communication Sciences, 18(1), 9-22.
Pew. (2016) News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Centre.
Phuong, T. T. K., & Vinh, T. T. (2017). Proposing an extension of the technology acceptance model to explain Facebook user acceptance of Facebook event page. Asian Social Science, 13(6), 133- 141.
Rahaman, M. A., Hassan, H. K., Asheq, A. A., & Islam, K. A. (2022). The interplay between eWOM information and purchase intention on social media: Through the lens of IAM and TAM theory. PloS one, 17(9), e0272926.
Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 19(1), 2-13.
Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of enterprise information management, 27(1), 6-30.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Becker, J. M. (2014), “SmartPLS 3”, Hamburg: SmartPLS. Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 419-445.
Sahharon, H., Bolong, J., & Omar, S. Z. (2018). Enhancing the Sense of Togetherness among Youth via Facebook: A Case Study on 1Malaysia Wireless Village Project. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of family business strategy, 5(1), 105-115.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., and Tondeur, J. (2019), “The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education”, Computers and Education, Vol. 128, pp. 13-35.
Sefrika, S., & Alawiah, E. T. (2020). Acceptance of Video Conference Technology as a Distance Learning Media with the TAM Method. IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System and Technology), 4(1), 465-470.
Shibchurn, J., & Yan, X. (2015). Information disclosure on social networking sites: An intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 103-117.
Singer, J. B., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Hermida, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., ... & Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. John Wiley &Sons.
Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., and Mantymaki, M. (2020), “Barriers toward purchasing from online travel agencies”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 89.
technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-340.
Tefertiller, A. (2020). Cable cord-cutting and streaming adoption: advertising avoidance and technology acceptance in television innovation. Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101416.
Teo, T. (2016). Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 745-757.
Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of communication, 53(4), 694-710.
Troise, C., and Camilleri, M. A. (2020), “The use of digital media for marketing, CSR communication and stakeholder engagement”, in Camilleri, M.A. (Ed.), Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age, Emerald, Bingley.
Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
West, R. L., Turner, L. H., & Zhao, G. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (Vol. 2). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach.Qualitative market research: an international journal, 16(4), 362-369.
Yadamsuren, B., & Erdelez, S. (2011). Online news reading behavior: From habitual reading to stumbling upon news. Proceedings of the American society for information science and technology, 48(1), 1- 10.
Yang, H., and Lee, H. (2018), “Exploring user acceptance of streaming media devices: an extended perspective of flow theory”, Information Systems and e-Business Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
Yang, Y., & Ha, L. (2021). Why people use TikTok (Douyin) and how their purchase intentions are affected by social media influencers in China: A uses and gratifications and parasocial relationship perspective. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(3), 297-305.
Yuan, E. (2011). News consumption across multiple media platforms.Communication & Society,14, 998–918.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.

In-Text Citation: (Han et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Han, Y., Mahamed, M. B., Abdullah, Z., & Abas, W. A. B. W. (2023). Integrating TAM and UGT to Explore Motivations of using Social Media for News Reading among Chinese College Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 2374 – 2389.

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode