ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Insults against Islam have long been going on, Muslims have received insults from various quarters since the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) developed Islamic religion. This situation has dragged on until now and will continue to drag on. Thus, the controversy over the issue of insulting Islam through cartoons or caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in 2005 through a Danish newspaper is not a new issue. Previously and until now various cartoons painted insulting Islam were spread in many other mass media. Using an analytical descriptive approach, this paper will review the controversy sparked by the production of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad painted by Kurt Westergaard, a Danish cartoonist at the Jyllands-Posten newspaper. There are two different perspectives in looking at this controversy, the first perspective is the absence of moral elements in ethics that exclude religious sensitivity, the second perspective is also the right to freedom of speech in communication ethics which is based on the ideology of Liberalism. But the motive or purpose for which the cartoons were produced must be hidden the implied agenda that has been devised by the enemies of Islam, especially in the West, given their prejudiced attitude towards the teachings and adherents of Islam who are considered their enemies. Liberalism is a trick to justify the means, the clear agenda of which is to instil sentiments of hatred and universal hostility towards Islam. Thus various ways were created to convey intent and objectives.
Al-Quran al-Qarim.
Abdullah, A. A. (1997), Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Islam, in Murad, A. F. (ed.), Tamadun Islam. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Academic American Encyclopedia. (1998). United States: Grolier Incorporated.
Ahmad, S. (1981). Kesusasteraan dan etika Islam. Fajar Bakti.
Antariksa, G. P., Lapian, A. B. & Dermawan, A. T. (1990). Eksiklopedia National Indonesia. Jil. 8. Jakarta: Cipta Adi Pustaka.
Baelz, P. (1997). Ethics and belief. London: Sheldon Press
Berthens. K. (2003). Keprihatinan Moral. Telaah atas Masalah Moral. Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Cambridge International Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. (1997). Germany: Cambridge University Press.
Carens, J. (2006). Free Speech and Democratic Norms in the Danish Cartoons Controversy, International Migration 44(5): 33-42.
Cass, P. (2006). A dozen Danish cartoons and the wrath of the Muslim world. Pacific Journalism Review, 12, 148-154.
Coady, C. A. J., (1995). Distributive Justice, A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Editor: Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Blackwell Publishing.
Daryati, E. (2007). Hijab dan konsep Kebebasan (Liberalisme) bag-2; Asas-Asas Liberalisme. Retrieve from http://islamfeminis.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/hijab-dan-konsep-kebebasan-liberalisme-bag-2-asas-asas-konsep-liberalisme/.
Douai, A. (2007). Tales of transgression or clashing paradigms: The Danish cartoon controversy and Arab media. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
Edwards, S. (2006). On the right to give offence. Policy, 22, 32-35.
Gombrich, E. (1992). Introduction to exhibition catalogue 'The Art of Laughter'. Cartoon Art Trust.
Johannesen, R. (2002). Ethics in human communication. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Kamus Dewan, (2002). Third edition. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kuala Lumpur.
Low, D. 1976. Cartoon. In Encylopedia Americana. New York: American Corporation, vol. 5, pp. 728-34.
Mackie, J. (1990). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. United Kingdom: Penguin Books Limited.
Mahamood, M. (2004). The history of Malay editorial cartoons (1930-1993). Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Malek, A. (2007). Beyond the cartoon controversy: An editor reflects on his decision. Columbia Journalism Review, 45, 18-19.
McQuail, D. (1983). Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
Modood, T., Hansen, R., Bleich, E., O’Leary, B., and Carens, J. (2006). The Danish cartoon affair: Free speech, racism, Islamism and integration. International Migration, 44, 3-62.
Mohamad, B., Abu Bakar, H. & Rofie, M. K. (2004). Imej Islam di Media Cetak: Analisis Kandungan Akhbar Mingguan di Malaysia. The Malaysian Journal of Language and Communication. Vol. 1 (1), 79-98. Retrieve from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12116015.pdf
Mohamed, S. A. (2008). Keperluan pembangunan etika dan moral dikalangan pelajar. Persidangan Serantau Nilai dan Professionalisme. Pusat Pengajian Umum, UKM Bangi.
Seymour-Ure. (1996). The editorial cartoon in the contemporary British Press: change or decay? In Mots, vol. 48.
Shearmur, J. (2006). Free speech, offence and religion [Free speech is not a licence to disregard the sensibilities of others.]. Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 22(2), 21-25.
Solomon, R. C. (1984). Ethics: A Brief Introduction. United States: McGraw-Hill.
Stromback, J., Shehata A., Dimitrova D., and Lee, K. (2007). Framing the Mohammad cartoons issue: A crosscultural comparison of the Swedish and U.S. press. Paper presentedat the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
Wallace, K. (1955). An ethical basis of communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 4, 1-9.
Zaelani, R. A. (2010). Seni dan Moral. Retrieve from http://www.indonesiaartnews.or.id/artikeldetil.php?id=46 .
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode