ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Effective contemporary leadership in tertiary education is crucial for navigating the complex challenges that institutions face in the globalized world. This abstract explores the global stakeholders' viewpoint on leadership in tertiary education, emphasizing the need for adaptability, inclusivity, and innovation. In the rapidly evolving landscape of higher education, leaders must demonstrate adaptability to meet the diverse needs of students, faculty, and the broader community. This requires a nuanced understanding of cultural, technological, and pedagogical shifts. Inclusivity becomes paramount as leaders strive to create environments that celebrate diversity and foster equitable opportunities for all stakeholders. Global perspectives underscore the importance of cultivating a collaborative and culturally sensitive leadership approach, acknowledging the interconnectedness of education across borders. Furthermore, effective contemporary leaders in tertiary education must embrace innovation to address emerging challenges and capitalize on opportunities. This involves leveraging technology, incorporating interdisciplinary approaches, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Stakeholders worldwide emphasize the significance of visionary leadership that goes beyond traditional paradigms, encouraging creative problem-solving and forward-thinking strategies. Global stakeholders advocate for leadership that goes beyond administrative roles, emphasizing the cultivation of a shared vision that aligns with the evolving needs of society. Leaders should engage in strategic planning, leverage data-driven decision-making, and prioritize sustainability to ensure the long-term success and relevance of tertiary education institutions. Effective contemporary leadership in tertiary education, as viewed by global stakeholders, requires adaptability, inclusivity, and innovation. Leaders must navigate the complexities of a globalized world, embracing diversity, fostering collaboration, and embracing visionary strategies to ensure the continued success of higher education institutions on the global stage.
Al Qalhati, N., Karim, A. M., Al Mughairi, B., Al Hilali, K., & Hossain, M. I. (2020). Technology and HR Practices in Educational Sector in Sharqiya Governate of Oman. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(10), 435-443.
Alkaabi, A. K. A. S., Adaikalam, J., Karim, A. M., Hock, O. Y., & Hossain, M. I. (2020). Influence on Internal Control through Digitalization of Assets: A Study on Ministry of Interior, UAE. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 10 (1),13-24.
Bass, B. M. (2020). Transformational Leadership in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 686–706.
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Bensimon, E. M., Dowd, A. C., Witham, K., & Lewis, L. (2005). The role of performance indicators in institutionalizing a commitment to access and equity. In Rethinking the “L” Word in Higher Education: The Revolution of Research on Leadership, New Directions for Higher Education (pp. 35-48). Jossey-Bass.
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Mansilla, B. V., & Duraisingh, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215-237.
Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2021). Distributed Leadership in Higher Education: A Review of Current Research. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1216–1232.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill.
Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence. SAGE Publications.
Eckel, P. D., & Kezar, A. (2003). Taking the reins: Institutional transformation in higher education. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Eddy, P., & Van de Vord, R. (2020). Leadership Challenges in Times of Crisis: A Case Study of University Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1445–1455.
Fullan, M. (2016). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. John Wiley & Sons.
Gardner, S. K., & Barlow, J. (2020). Leading Change in Higher Education: Lessons from a Decade of Organizational Transformation. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(5), 20–27.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hossain, M. I., Kumar, J., Islam, M. T., & Valeri, M. (2023). The interplay among paradoxical leadership, industry 4.0 technologies, organisational ambidexterity, strategic flexibility and corporate sustainable performance in manufacturing SMEs of Malaysia. European Business Review.
Hossain, M. I., Teh, B. H., Tabash, M. I., Alam, M. N., & San Ong, T. (2022). Paradoxes on sustainable performance in Dhaka’s enterprising community: a moderated-mediation evidence from textile manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, (ahead-of-print).
Kezar, A., & Holcombe, E. (2017). Shared leadership: Is it time for a change? The Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(2), 20-29.
Komives, S. R., Dugan, J. P., Owen, J. E., Slack, C., & Wagner, W. (2006). The handbook for student leadership development. John Wiley & Sons.
Rienties, B., & Beausaert, S. (2018). Understanding (in) effective international teaching: A mixed-methods study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(7), 823-848.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30-32.
Trowler, P. R. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 1-87.
Trowler, P. R. (2021). Leading in Uncertain Times: A Study of Resilient Leadership in Higher Education. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 42–55.
(Chowdhury et al., 2024)
Chowdhury, T. I., Saeedi, A. S. Al, Karim, A. M., Ahmed, A. R., & Karim, A. M. (2024). Effective Contemporary Leadership in the Tertiary Education: Global Stakeholders Viewpoint. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 479–490.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode