ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Orphan works are works (e.g., books, photographs, films) that are still protected by copyright law but whose copyright owners are untraceable by prospective users. The exercise of searching for the copyright owners before exploiting their works is critical in copyright law, as failure to do so would constitute copyright infringement. This aspect, however, cannot be met because the copyright holders are either unknown or untraceable. Globally, the discussions in this area are primarily focused on developing legal mechanisms to legalise the use of orphan works. For example, the suggestion to use the copyright statute's fair dealing defence and the proposal to implement a specific legal exception for the use of orphan works. The trend to examine orphan works policies, on the other hand, is not heavily discussed by the copyright society, despite the fact that this aspect is critical in understanding certain basic principles of the relevant laws. In this light, the purpose of this study was to fill the gap by examining the relevant orphan works policies in the selected jurisdictions by using policy analysis. The purpose is two-pronged. Firstly, to identify the similarities and unique characteristics of the orphan works policies. Secondly, to extract the basic principles and other important information that policymakers can use when developing their own version of orphan works policies and laws. Among the key findings are the importance of maintaining the goal of knowledge dissemination from orphan works and implementing the principle of openness to promote free movement of knowledge and innovation. It is hoped that this research will aid policymakers and legislators in better understanding the issue and developing a more robust solution.
Ahmed, B. A., & Kameran H., A.-S. (2020). Analysis of the proposed solutions for the use of orphan works across the world. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3–4)
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation : The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press, 2006.
Chesbrough, H. (2003) "The Era of Open Innovation." MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, 35-41.
Chesbrough, H., and Bogers, M. (2014). "Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation." In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, edited by Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke and Joel West. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Commission of the European Communities. (2005a), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committe and the Committee of the Regions "i2010 - A European Information Society for Growth and Employment" [COM (2005) 229 Final],
Commission of the European Communities. (2005b), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Comittee and the Committee of the Regions - i2010: Digital Libraries [COM (2005) 465 Final]
Commission of the European Communities. (2006), Commission Decision on the Setting up of a High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries (2006/178/EC)
Commission of the European Communities. (2008), Green Paper Copyright in the Knowledge Economy [COM(2008) 466]
Commission of the European Communities. (2010), Communication from the Commission: EUROPE 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Growth, 14
Copyright Board of Canada. (2006), Decision of the Board for Licence Application by Breakthrough Films & Television for the Reproduction Through Off-Camera Narration of Book Extracts in a Television Program 9
De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's Orphan Works Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215-25
European Commission. (2011), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Certain Permittted Uses of Orphan Works, COM(2011) 289 Final, 2011/0136 (COD).
Favale, M. (2019). Bouncing Back From Oblivion: Can Reversionary Copyright Help Unlocking Orphan Works? . European Intellectual Property Review, 41(6), 339-346.
Favale, M. (2019). Bouncing Back From Oblivion: Can Reversionary Copyright Help Unlocking Orphan Works? . European Intellectual Property Review, 41(6), 339-346.
Gassmann, O., and Enkel, E. (2004) "Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archtypes." Paper presented at the The R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 6 - 9 July 2004.
Goldenfein, J., & Hunter, D. (2017). Blockchains, Orphan Works, and the Public Domain. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 41, 1-43.
Gompel, S. V., and Hugenholtz, P. B. (2010) "The Orphan Works Problem: The Copyright Conundrum of Digitizing Large-Scale Audiovisual Archives, and How to Solve It." Popular Communication The International Journal of Media and Culture, 8(1), 61-71
Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property
Hansen, D. R. (2016). Digitizing Orphan Works: Legal Strategies to Reduce Risks for Open Access in Copyrighted Orphan Works. Harvard Library. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=DAeOAQAACAAJ
Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth.
High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries. (2009), Final Report on Digital Libraries: Recommendations and Challenges for the Future, Commission of the European Communities (2009).
Hull, G. (2008). Clearing Rubbish: Locke, the Waste Proviso, and the Moral Justification of Intellectual Property. Public Affairs Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93
Library and Archives Canada. (2015), Policy on Copyright Management," https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/about-us/policy/Pages/policy-copyright-management.aspx#TOC5.
Ministry of Law Singapore. (2019). Singapore Copyright Review Report.
Khair, M. H., Hashim, M. H. N., & Maria, A. (2019). Public Good Theory: A Theoretical Justification For Permissive Licence To Use and Reuse Orphan Works. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 179–197.
Khair, M. H., & Hashim, M. H. N. (2020). Justifications of Intellectual Property Rights: A Discussion on Locke and Hegel’s Theories. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(2), 114-123.
Khair, M. H., & Hashim, M. H. N. (2021). Exploring the suitability of Chesbrough’s open innovation concept for the exploitation and management of orphan works under copyright law. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 11(2), 136–153.
Sookman, B. (2019). Orphan Works: The Canadian Solution. https://www.barrysookman.com/2014/04/27/orphan-works-the-canadian-solution/.
UK Intellectual Property Office. (2011a), The Government Response to the Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth
UK Intellectual Property Office. (2011b), Government Policy Statement: Consultation on Modernising Copyright
UK Intellectual Property Office. (2014), Consultation on Implementing a Domestic Orphan Works Licensing Scheme and the EU Directive on Certain Permitted Uses of Orphan Works
US Copyright Office (2015). Orphan Works and Mass Digitization: a Report of the Registrar of Copyrights.
Wilkin, J. P. (2011). Bibliographic Indeterminacy and the Scale of Problems and Opportunities of Rights in Digital Collection Building [online]. C. o. L. a. I. Resources. https://www.clir.org/pubs/ruminations/wilkin/
(Khair et al., 2024)
Khair, M. H. M., Rodzi, Z. M., Azmi, A. F., Ahmad, N. L., & Ariffin, M. A. (2024). Decoding Orphan Works Policies: Lessons from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and India. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2), 1648–1658.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode