ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
In recent years, Malaysian universities have increased their offerings of foundation degrees. Transitioning from a foundation to an honors degree is now a popular path in higher education. This often involves moving from a further education institution to a higher one. Foundation students may struggle with the university syllabus, so it's important to provide a high-quality, international standard syllabus, especially in subjects like foundation Physics, to help them succeed. This paper reports on the syllabus comparison between UiTM Foundation Physics syllabus with the Cambridge International AS Level Physics. It highlights the differences between both syllabuses and in the aim to improvise the UiTM Foundation Physics syllabus as to strengthen the students’ foundation knowledge before they pursue to the degree level. The outcome presented here suggests an explicit finding that UiTM Foundation Physics syllabus is a complete one-year studies and covers more than the Cambridge International AS Level Physics syllabus.
Abdullah, N., Anuar, N., Zolkipli, N. F., Shaharudin, R. H., & Hod, S. N. S. (2019, November). Assessing Pre-University Students' Attitude Towards Mathematics. In 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 251-254). IEEE.
Baker, L., & Heron, M. (2023). Advocating for oracy: supporting student success in foundation year study. Journal of further and higher education, 47(10), 1289-1303.
Centre of Foundation Studies, UiTM Dengkil, https://asasi.uitm.edu.my/ Accessed 12 July 2022. Cambridge International AS Physics website, available at: https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/ Accessed 13 July 2022.
Craig, J. (2009). New ways of being public: the experience of foundation degrees. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 23-31.
Foundation Degree Forward 2008 website, available at: www.fdf.ac.uk Accessed 13 July 2022.
Fenge, L. A. (2011). ‘A second chance at learning but it’s not quite higher education’: experience of a foundation degree. Journal of further and higher education, 35(3), 375-390.
Firman, F., Baedhowi, B., & Murtini, W. (2018). The effectiveness of the scientific approach to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 86-91.
Ferreira, M., Marques, A., & Santos, S. (2024). Foundations of teaching and learning–a study with teachers on conceptions and pedagogical practices. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 67-84.
Greenbank, P. (2007). From foundation to honours degree: the student experience. Education+ Training, 49(2), 91-102.
Nagl, M. G., Obadovic, D. Z., & Segedinac, M. (2012). Effective teaching of physics and scientific method. Tem Journal, 1(2), 85-89.
Nazri, N. A., Muhammad, F. H., Sheikh, S. N. Y., Suhaimi, H. N. H., Saidin, N., Ngah, S., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). What is The Relationship between Burnout and Motivation to Learn?. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(8), 1596-1614.
Nugroho, B. H., & Jaqin, C. (2021). Implementation of Benchmarking Method for Higher Education Institution: A Literature Review. IJIEM (Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management), 2(2).
Nur’ariyani, S., Jumyati, J., Yuliyanti, Y., Nulhakim, L., & Leksono, S. M. (2023). Scientific approach to learning science in elementary schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6659-6666.
Pepper, I., Cox, C., Fee, R., Horgan, S., Jarman, R., Jones, M., & Tattum, C. (2024). The first national subject benchmark statement for UK higher education in policing: the importance of effective partnership and collaboration. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning.
Raoufi, K., Raman, A. S., Haapala, K. R., & Paul, B. K. (2018). Benchmarking undergraduate manufacturing engineering curricula in the United States. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, 1378-1387.
Shah Ph, D., & Kumar, R. (2020). Relevance of Foundation of Education Curriculum from Indigenous Knowledge Perspectives: Post-Graduation Teachers’ and Students Opinions. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 8(11), 3606-3621.
Sharafuddin, H., & Allani, C. (2024). Making TMAs Meaningful: An Evaluation of the Online Assessment within a Blended Learning System. American J Sci Edu Re: AJSER-157.
Simm, D., Marvell, A., Winlow, H., & Schaaf, R. (2011). Student experiences of foundation degrees in further and higher education. Planet, 24(1), 2-9.
Smith, P. H. (2015). An exploration of teaching assistants' engagement with Foundation degree study (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Tomasella, B., Akbar, B., Lawson, A., Howarth, R., & Bedford, R. (2024). Embedding the Sustainable Development Goals Into Higher Education Institutions’ Marketing Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 02734753241231182.
Winter, J., & Dismore, H. (2010). Investigating the experiences of foundation degree students progressing to an honours degree: an integrated approach. Journal of further and higher education, 34(2), 253-270.
(Fadzil & Nazri, 2024)
Fadzil, A. F. M., & Nazri, N. A. A. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Physics Syllabi: Uitm Foundation Physics Vs. Cambridge International As Level Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3), 1248–1258.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode