ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study examines the framing techniques employed by the English language online news portals, namely Free Malaysia Today and The Star, in their coverage of the Malaysia 15th General Election (GE-15). The objective is to conduct a comparative content analysis of how these news portals framed the news during the GE-15. The study employs a quantitative research approach, utilizing content analysis as the primary method of data collection and analysis. A total of 418 news (N=418) articles related to the GE-15 from both Free Malaysia Today and The Star have systematically selected and analysed within a specific timeframe (5/11/2022-19/5/2022) to identify the framing strategies utilized in their coverage. The findings of this study contribute to the existing body of knowledge on news framing and media representation of elections in Malaysia. Through the comparative content analysis, findings reveal that two different news portals have dominant frames and present political news differently, having problems on potential biases, perspectives, and their impact on public opinion. The frequency of occurrence of these framing strategies in the news articles have assessed their similarities and differences. Particularly during the GE-15, the articles in both media platforms primarily aimed at reinforcing their respective ideological stances rather than offering alternative explanations or dissenting views.
Ahmad, N. (2022). Dear Free Malaysia Today—Your words matter: COVID-19 and its subtle rhetoric. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 14(1), 19-32.
Anderson, C. W., Downie, L., & Schudson, M. (2016). The news media: What everyone needs to know: Oxford University Press.
Arguedas, A. R., Banerjee, S., Mont’Alverne, C., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). News for the powerful and privileged: How misrepresentation and underrepresentation of disadvantaged communities undermine their trust in news. Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism.
Baharin, M. I., Waheed, M., Ghazali, A. H. A., & Ahmad, A. M. T. (2020). Framing Analysis of Malaysia's Media Outlets and Editorial Decisions Concerning Frame Preferences after the 2008 General Election. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2).
Bennett, W. L. (2016). News: The politics of illusion: University of Chicago Press.
Bhuiyan, M. M., Whitley, H., Horning, M., Lee, S. W., & Mitra, T. (2021). Designing transparency cues in online news platforms to promote trust: Journalists'& consumers' perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSC W2), 1-31.
Campbell, V. (2014). Framing environmental risks and natural disasters in factual entertainment television. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 58-74.
Dalton, R. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies: Cq Press.
Daud, M., & Zulhuda, S. (2020). REGULATING THE SPREAD OF FALSE CONTENT ONLINE IN MALAYSIA: ISSUES, CHALLENGES AND THE WAY FORWARD. International Journal of Business & Society, 21.
De Vreese, C. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191-214.
De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information design journal & document design, 13(1).
De Vreese, C. H., & Lecheler, S. (2012). News framing research: An overview and new developments. The SAGE handbook of political communication, 292-306.
Ding, J.-A., Koh, L. C., Surin, J. A., Dragomir, M., Thompson, M., & Watts, G. (2013). Mapping digital media: Malaysia. Open Society Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis: Oxford University Press, USA.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 390, 397.
Entman, R. M. (2010). Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign 2008. Journalism, 11(4), 389-408.
Foreman, G., Biddle, D. R., Lounsberry, E., & Jones, R. G. (2022). The ethical journalist: Making responsible decisions in the digital age: John Wiley & Sons.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
Govindaraju, G. M., Sahadevan, K. J., & Ling, T. (2019). Framing analysis of news coverage on renewable energy in the star online news portal. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Issue on SU18, February, 33-43.
Adnan, H. W., & Ramly, M. R. A. (2021). Political participation through social media in Malaysia: a review of literature. Journal of Media and Information Warfare (JMIW), 14(2), 122-128.
Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In Framing public life (pp. 157-178): Routledge.
Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion: University of Chicago Press.
Jungherr, A., Rodríguez, G. R., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy: Cambridge University Press.
Kalsnes, B., & Larsson, A. O. (2021). Facebook news use during the 2017 Norwegian elections—assessing the influence of hyperpartisan news. Journalism practice, 15(2), 209-225.
Kozina, T. (2017). Horse racing in Melbourne newspapers: themes within content-a critical discourse analysis. RMIT University Melbourne,
Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. International encyclopedia of communication, 1(1), 403-407.
Landa, D., & Pevnick, R. (2021). Is random selection a cure for the ills of electoral representation? Journal of Political Philosophy, 29(1), 46-72.
Laursen, B., & Trapp, N. L. (2021). Experts or advocates: shifting roles of central sources used by journalists in news stories? Journalism practice, 15(1), 1-18.
Levy, R. e. (2021). Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. American economic review, 111(3), 831-870.
Majó-Vázquez, S., Cardenal, A. S., Segarra, O., & de Simón, P. C. (2020). Media roles in the online news domain: Authorities and emergent audience brokers. Media and communication, 8(2), 98-111.
Malik, D. D. (2022). Ethics of Political Communication in Welcoming the Implementation of the 2024 General Election. ijd-demos, 4(2).
Meyer, T. M., Haselmayer, M., & Wagner, M. (2020). Who gets into the papers? Party campaign messages and the media. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 281-302.
Mokhberian, N., Abeliuk, A., Cummings, P., & Lerman, K. (2020). Moral framing and ideological bias of news. Paper presented at the Social Informatics: 12th International Conference, SocInfo 2020, Pisa, Italy, October 6–9, 2020, Proceedings 12.
Nai, A. (2020). Going negative, worldwide: Towards a general understanding of determinants and targets of negative campaigning. Government and Opposition, 55(3), 430-455.
NDIDI, K. E. (2021). EFFECT OF HUMAN INTEREST FRAMING ON NEWS COVERAGE.
Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2022). The power of platforms: Shaping media and society (Vol. 16): Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2020). Electoral Integrity in the 2020 American Elections (PEI-US-2020). Electoral Integrity Project: Cambridge, MA.
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Srinivasan, P. (2022). An unavoidable convenience: How post-millennials engage with the news that finds them on social and mobile media. Journalism, 23(9), 1939-1954.
Ostwald, K. (2020). Malaysia 2020: The impasse of two-coalition politics: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political communication, 10(1), 55-75.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In Framing public life (pp. 51-82): Routledge.
Paterson, C., Paterson, C. A., & Domingo, D. (2008). Making online news: The ethnography of new media production (Vol. 49): Peter Lang.
Reese, S. D., Gandy, J., & Grant, A. E. (2001). Prologue—Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In Framing public life (pp. 23-48): Routledge.
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2016). Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of management studies, 53(3), 299-329.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F., & Watson, B. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research: Routledge.
Ryfe, D. M. (2023). How journalists internalize news practices and why it matters. Journalism, 24(5), 921-937.
Sani, M. A. M. (2014). Malaysia’s 13th general election: Political partisanship in the mainstream print media. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 61-75.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
Shapiro, G., & Markoff, J. (2020). A matter of definition. In Text analysis for the social sciences (pp. 9-32): Routledge.
Soren, A. A., & Chakraborty, S. (2024). Adoption, satisfaction, trust, and commitment of over-the-top platforms: An integrated approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103574.
Tewksbury, D., & Rittenberg, J. (2012). News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century: Oxford University Press.
Tiung, L. K., & Hasim, M. S. (2009). Media framing of a political personality: A case study of a Malaysian politician. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 408-424.
Tiung, L. K., Idris, R. Z., & Idris, R. (2018). PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION: POLITIK PERSEPSI DALAM PILIHAN RAYA UMUM KE-14 (PRU-14) MALAYSIA: PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION: POLITICS OF PERCEPTION IN MALAYSIA 14TH GENERAL ELECTION (GE-14). Jurnal Kinabalu, 171-171.
Tuchman, G. (2013). The production of news. In A handbook of media and communication research (pp. 90-102): Routledge.
Ufen, A. (2020). Opposition in transition: pre-electoral coalitions and the 2018 electoral breakthrough in Malaysia. Democratization, 27(2), 167-184.
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., & Ramírez, J. (2017). Behavioral effects of framing on social media users: How conflict, economic, human interest, and morality frames drive news sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 803-826.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as Discourse. New Jersey: University of Amsterdam.
Venkiteswaran, G. (2020). Media Reforms and Politics in Malaysia. Bandung, 7(2), 279-291.
Watson, J. (2007). Representing realities: An overview of news framing. Keio Communication Review, 29(1), 107-131.
Weiss, M. (2014). New media, new activism: trends and trajectories in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. International Development Planning Review, 36(1), 91-109.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55(1), 22-45.
Xia, L., & Wang, W. (2020). Institutionalization in news translation: The use and abuse of manipulation. Language Research in Multilingual Settings: Doing Research Knowledge Dissemination at the Sites of Practice, 71-93.
Yeoh, T. (2023). Incumbency and patronage politics in Malaysia’s GE15. The Round Table, 112, 286 - 306.
Zheng, J. (2019). News about news: a re-framing analysis of Chinese reports of foreign coverage about China.
(Liang & Tiung, 2024)
Liang, N. W., & Tiung, L. K. (2024). Media Framing of The Free Malaysia Today and The Star English Language Online News Portal: The Case Studies of Malaysia’s 15th General Election 2022. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(6), 1144–1163.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode