ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study investigates the impact of different personality qualities, namely Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and empathy, on prosocial behavior in a sample of 322 adults. The study employed a quantitative research methodology to examine personality traits and prosocial behavior using self-reported measures. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were then conducted to determine the predictive potential of these traits. The examination of levels of prosocial conduct indicated that a majority of individuals displayed elevated tendencies towards engaging in prosocial actions. Similarly, the distribution of personality traits exhibited elevated scores mostly in the dimensions of Conscientiousness and Openness. Correlation research revealed notable positive associations between prosocial conduct and the majority of personality qualities, with empathy being the most prominent factor. Importantly, there was no significant correlation observed between Neuroticism and prosocial conduct. The results of the multiple regression analysis highlighted the importance of empathy in predicting prosocial conduct, transcending the impact of other personality qualities. The regression model explained a significant amount of the variation in prosocial behavior, demonstrating the powerful ability of empathy in conjunction with specific personality traits to make accurate predictions. The study emphasizes the crucial role of empathy in cultivating prosocial behaviors, indicating that interventions targeting the improvement of empathetic abilities could be successful in encouraging prosocial activities in different situations.
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (2019). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry.
Clark, A. B., & others. (2020). Empathy and prosocial behavior: The role of mediation. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 481-495.
Decety, J. (2015). The neural pathways, development, and functions of empathy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2019). The psychological science of morality: A compassionate approach. Nature Human Behaviour.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2016). Prosocial Development. Guilford Press.
Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. Oxford University Press.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2018). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality.
Mestre, M. V., & others. (2017). Empathy and prosocial behavior: The role of mediation and social understanding. Journal of Psychology.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (2014). Prosocial Development: A Multidimensional Approach. Oxford University Press.
Poropat, A. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338.
Roberts, B. W., & others. (2005). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin.
Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The life outcomes of personality replication project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711-727.
Spinrad, T. L., & Eisenberg, N. (2017). Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Positive Development in Schools. Springer.
Telle, N.-T., & Pfister, H.-R. (2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Thompson, G., & Chen, P. Y. (2021). Agreeableness and prosocial behavior: Contextual variability in personality-outcome relations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 114-123.
Zaki, J. (2019). The War for Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World. Crown.
Anwar, F. D. K., Ma’rof, A. A., & Abdullah, H. (2024). The Relationship Between Personality and Empathy on Prosocial Behavior among Undergraduate Students in KLANG Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 1912–1924.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode