ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
In the context of rapid globalization and heightened cultural exchange, cross-cultural translation and literary reception have emerged as critical areas of inquiry within contemporary literary studies. This review investigates the trends in the reception of Ian McEwan’s novels among readers in mainland China. A systematic analysis was conducted using databases such as CNKI, EBSCO, Web of Science, Taylor and Francis, and Science Direct, focusing on twenty scholarly articles published between 2000 and 2024. Employing content analysis as the primary methodological framework, the findings indicate a significant gap in studies addressing the reception of McEwan’s works by general readers. Notably, only a limited number of novels—specifically Saturday, Amsterdam, The Cement Garden, The Comfort of Strangers, and Atonement—have achieved considerable acceptance among Chinese audiences since 2014. These insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of the reception dynamics of Western literary texts in a non-Western context, offering valuable perspectives for literary scholars and researchers.
Bradford, R. (2009). The novel now: Contemporary British fiction. John Wiley & Sons.
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press, USA.
Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Wieland, A. (2017). A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(4), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145
Fu, M. L. (2016). Textuality of History and Historicity of Text: New Historical Analysis of Ian McEwan’s Black Dogs. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n3p98
He, J. (2024). On Violence Writing in Ian McEwan’s Saturday. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 5(1), p114. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.22158/elsr.v5n1p114
He, J. (2024). On Violence Writing in Ian McEwan’s Saturday. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 5(1), p114. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v5n1p114
Head, D. (2013). Ian McEwan. Ian McEwan. Manchester University Press. https://www.manchesterhive.com/abstract/9781847791733/9781847791733.xml
Hill, L. (1980). Wolfgang Iser, The Act of Reading: A theory of aesthetic response, (London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978). Oxford Literary Review, 4(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.1980.010
Holub, R. C. (2013). Reception theory. Routledge.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press.
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabi?, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Malcolm, D. (2002). Understanding Ian McEwan. Univ of South Carolina Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71.short
Pless, N., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an Inclusive Diversity Culture: Principles, Processes and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-9465-8
Rockhill, P. H. (1996). The reception theory of Hans Robert Jauss: Theory and application. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/5153/
Selçuk, A. A. (2019). A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.4058
Shang, B. (2018). Ethical literary criticism and Ian McEwan’s Nutshell. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 59(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2017.1378612
Shanghai Translation Publishing House - Ian McEwan. (n.d.). Available at: http://www.stph.com.cn (Accessed 10 August, 2024).
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Van Doorslaer, L., & Gambier, Y. (2013). Handbook of Translation Studies. 1–244.
Venuti, L. (2022). World Literature and Translation Studies. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Routledge.
Wang, D., & Tian, J. (2024). Punish with Impunity: The Unreliable Narration in My Purple Scented Novel. Anq-A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles Notes and Reviews, 37(3), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769X.2023.2183812
Zhou, M., & Wu, W. (2022). Negotiation between social structure and personal feelings—An inquiry into the covert progressions in Ian McEwan’s Machines like me. Neohelicon, 49(2), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00655-9
??. (2014). ?????????????? [Reading Ian McEwan’s Saturday as an Urban-Gothic Novel]. ??????, 35(3), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.16077/j.cnki.issn1001-1757.2014.03.014
??. (2016). ??·????????????????? [The Narration of Violence in Ian McEwan’s Saturday]. ????, 32(1), 36–40.
??. (2018). ?????????:????????????——???·????????????? [Description of urban interpersonal distance: a sociological study of urban literature language—taking Ian McEwan's novel Saturday as an example]. ?????????????????, 38(4), 111–115.
???. (2014). ?“??”?“??”——???????????????? [From "Macabre" to "Classic": The Ethical and Moral Crises in Ian McEwan's Fiction]. ??????, 35(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.16077/j.cnki.issn1001-1757.2014.02.013
?? & ???. (2021). ??? 20 ????????: ????? [Foreign Literature Studies in the Early 20 Years of the New Century: Review and Prospect]. Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature, 5(2).
???. (2015). ???????????????——???·?????????? [Postmodern reading from the perspective of rhetorical narrative: a case study of Sweet Tooth by Ian McEwan]. Journal of Xi'an Foreign Languages University, 23(3), 104–107. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1457/h.2015.03.024
???. (2021). ??·?????????????? [Review of research on Ian McEwan's novels in China]. ????, 4, 122–123.
??. (1998a). ????????? [On Comfort of Strangers]. ????, 6, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.16430/j.cnki.fl.1998.06.010
??. (1998b). ??·???????? [Ian McEwan and his works]. ????, 6, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.16430/j.cnki.fl.1998.06.007
???. (2021). “??”?????????????????????[Behind the Homophobic Narration: Another Critical Voice in Enduring Love]. Contemporary Foreign Literature, 42(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.16077/j.cnki.issn1001-1757.2021.02.013
?? & ???. (2019). ???70???????:?????——????????????????? [Seventy Years of Foreign Literature Research in New China: Review and Prospects — A Summary of the 15th Biennial Conference of the Chinese Association for Foreign Literature]. ??????, 4, 232–236.
??. (2017). ????????· ???????? [A study of Ian McEwan's novels from the perspective of empathy]. Beijing Book Co. Inc.
??. (2007). ?????????——????.???????????[Hegemonic Masculinity and Gender Politics? Interpreting Ian McEwan’s Homemade]. Foreign Literature, 1, 15–20, 126. https://doi.org/10.16430/j.cnki.fl.2007.01.003
???. (2018). ??·?????????:???????[Critical Reception of Ian McEwan in China]. English Studies, 1, 110–121.
???. (2019). “M”?????:????????????????[The Mystery of M’s Disappearance: Unnatural Narrative in Ian McEwan’s Solid Geometry]. Contemporary Foreign Literature, 40(3), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.16077/j.cnki.issn1001-1757.2019.03.009
???. (2021). ????????????????????[Unnatural Narrative and Its Political Satire in McEwan's The Cockroach]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University?Philosophy and Social Sciences?, 29(3), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.13806/j.cnki.issn1008-7095.2021.03.011
???. (2016). ?????????? [On the misreading narration of Atonement]. ????, 8, 89–91. https://doi.org/10.16491/j.cnki.cn45-1216/g2.2016.0302
???. (2015). ??????:??????????????????? [Intertextuality and Irony: Two Narrative Strategies in Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam]. ??????, 36(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.16077/j.cnki.issn1001-1757.2015.02.014
??. (2011). ????????:???????????? [The Comfort of Strangers: Phalanx of Unreliable Characters and Narration]. ????, 31(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.16345/j.cnki.cn11-1562/i.2011.02.010
??. (2022). ????????????????, ????? [The Spread, Influence and Practice of New Cultural History in the Past Twenty Years]. ????, 4.
??. (2017). ????????·???????? [A Study of Ian McEwan’s Works from the Perspectives of Ethics]. ??????, 25(9), 95–98.
??, ???, & ??. (2014). ????????? [Ethical Flaw in The Cement Garden]. ?????????????, 16(1), 89–92.
???. (2023). 21??????????????????? [The Frontier and Focus of Foreign Literature Studies in China in the 21st Century]. ????, 2, 13–21.
?? & ???. (2017). ?????:????????????[Sorrow and Salvation: Solar in the Context of Ecocriticism]. Social Science Front, 11, 264–268.
Wen, N., Abai, D. S. B. A., Chan, S. L., & Isa, N. A. binti M. (2024). Readers’ Reception Trend in Accepting Ian McEwan Novels in Mainland China ——A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), 1248–1260.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode