ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study aimed to investigate the nature of relationship among the antecedents of psychological empowerment and workplace consequences. Moreover, the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship among the culture of an organization, structural empowerment, and the consequences related to work has also been assessed. The data collection has been done through questionnaires, and quantitative research design was applied to generate the research outcomes. Faculty staff of private Jordanian universities was recruited for collecting data. It has been determined from the results that the structural and psychological empowerments are important predictors of the organizational commitment and job satisfaction. It has been concluded that in the context of higher education, the psychological empowerment seems to be a fundamental aspect in bringing enhancements in the attitudes of work outcomes of the faculty staff.
Aryee, S., & Chen, Z. X. (2006). Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents,
the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business
Research, 59(7), 793-801.
Bailey, T. L. (2009). Organizational culture, macro and micro empowerment dimensions, and job
satisfaction: An application of concurrent mixed and multi-level methods in the Federal
sector. Touro University International, U.S.A.
Bamberger, P. (2008). Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro–
macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839-846.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework.
Journal of Higher Education, 45( 1), 43-70.
Biron, M., & Bamberger, P. (2010). The impact of structural empowerment on individual wellbeing and performance: Taking agent preferences, self-efficacy and operational constraints
into account. Human Relations, 63(2), 163-191.
Block, P. (1987). The Empowered Manager: Positive Political Skills at Work, Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, D. E., & Lawler III, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how
and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31-39.
Brewerton, P. M., & Millward, L. J. (2001). Organizational Research Methods: A Guide for
Students and Researchers. Sage.
Brockner, J. (1988). Self-Esteem at Work, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Carless, S.A. (2004). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between
psychological climate and job satisfaction? Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 405-
425.
Chang, L. C., Shih, C. H., & Lin, S. M. (2010). The mediating role of psychological empowerment
on job satisfaction and organizational commitment for school health nurses: A crosssectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(4), 427-433.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integration theory and
practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 69–83.
Fralinger, B., Olson, V., Pinto-Zipp, G., & DiCorcia, M. (2010). Organizational culture at the
university level: A follow-up study using the OCAI instrument. Proceedings of 2010 EABR &
ETLC Conference Proceedings. 7-10 June 2010. Dublin, Ireland.
Gist, M., & Mitchell, T.N. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and
malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Goodwin, C. J. (2009). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. John Wiley & Sons.
Gordon, G., & Whitchurch, C. (2007). Managing human resources in higher education: The
implications of a diversifying workforce. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2),
135-155.
Henkin, A. B., & Marchiori, D. M. (2003). Empowerment and organizational commitment of
chiropractic faculty. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 26(6), 275.
Jiang, X., & Fu, Q. (2011). Relationship between universities organizational culture, teachers'
psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior. In Computational
Sciences and Optimization (CSO), 2011 Fourth International Joint Conference on (pp. 699-
703). IEEE.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of
Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and
Mixed Approaches.Sage.
Joo, B. K., & Shim, J. H. (2010). Psychological empowerment and organizational commitment:
the moderating effect of organizational learning culture. Human Resource Development
International, 13(4), 425-441.
Lambert, A. P. (2006). Faculty Perceptions of Emp
N/A
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode