ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Previous studies have proven that service information is evaluated in the customers’ cognitive at three abstraction levels, namely Service Personal Values (SPV – highest cognitive level), Service Value (SV– intermediate cognitive level), and Service Quality (SQ – lowest cognitive level). However, there are limited studies simultaneously examined the relationships between the customers’ cognitive levels and the consequent variables such as loyalty, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Therefore, the aim of this research is to test nomological validity of customers’ cognitive levels as antecedent on selected consequent variable in higher education context. Emotional Satisfaction (SAC) was selected to represent the consequent variable due to its strong theoretical building. This research was conducted at Malaysian Public Universities. The registered undergraduate students were selected to participate in this research. The data were gathered via a questionnaire using the quota sampling technique. Structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS was performed to test nomological validity of customers’ cognitive levels on E-SAC. Results revealed that the customers’ cognitive levels including SPV, SV, and SQ have significant effect on E-SAC. Thus, it is strongly concluded that SPV, SV, and SQ are valuable indicators to evaluate students’ positive emotions towards service experience in higher education.
Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305–328.
Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581.
Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70–94.
Abankina, I., Abankina, T., Filatova, L., Nikolayenko, E., & Seroshtan, E. (2012). The effects of reform on the performance of higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 4 (1), 23-41.
Mustaffa, W. S. W., Rahman, R. A., Wahad, H. A., & Taib, R. M. (2018). Testing Nomological Validity of Customers’ Cognitive Levels in Evaluating Higher Education Service Experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 12–31.
Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32.
Bishop, W. R. Jr., (1984). Competitive intelligence. Progressive Grocer, 63(3), 19–20.
Bayraktaroglu, G., & Atrek, B. (2010). Testing the superiority and dimensionality of SERVQUAL vs SERVPERF in higher education. Quality Management Journal, 17(1), 47–59.
Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Brady, M. K., Cronin, J. J., & Brand, R. R. (2002). Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 17–31.
Chen, C. F. (2008). Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: Evidence from Taiwan. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(4), 709–717.
Cronin, J Joseph, Brady, M. K., Brand, R. R., Jr, R. H., & Shemwell, D. J. (1997). A cross-sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value. Journal of service marketing, 11(6), 375–391.
Cronin, J Joseph, & Taylor, S. A. (1992). SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL?: Reconciling performance-based and measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 125–131.
Chou, C. C., Liu, L. J., Huang, S. F., Yih, J. M., & Han, T. C. (2011). An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted SERVQUAL method. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2117–2128.
Clarke, I., & Micken, K. S. (2002). An exploratory cross-cultural analysis of the values of materialism. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(4), 65–89.
Carrillat, F. A., Jaramillo, F., & Mulki, J. P. (2007). The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta-analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5), 472–490.
Drotskiie, A. (2009). Customer experience as strategic differentiator in retail banking. Paper Presented at Global Business & Technology Association, Czech Republic.
Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., & Madhavi, A. D. (2011). Beyond service attributes: do personal values matter? Journal of Services Marketing, 25(1), 33–46.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVIII (August 1991), 307–319.
Flint, D. J., Blocker, C. P., & Boutin, P. J. (2011). Customer value anticipation, customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical examination. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 219–230.
Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on customer categorization process. Journal of Marketing, 46, 60–72.
Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of linkages between consequences and values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 143–148.
Gooding, S. K. S. (1995). Quality, sacrifice, and value in hospital choice. Journal
In-Text Citation: (Mustaffa, Rahman, Wahad, & Taib, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Mustaffa, W. S. W., Rahman, R. A., Wahad, H. A., & Taib, R. M. (2018). Testing Nomological Validity of Customers’ Cognitive Levels in Evaluating Higher Education Service Experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 12–31.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode