Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Instrumental Motivation Orientation vs Integrative among Arabic Language and Literature Diploma Students

Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, Ab Aziz Sulaiman, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4736

Open access

Motivation is the key and the driver of success in language learning. There are two types of orientations that are often associated with language learning motivation which are integrative and instrumental. This paper aims to identify the dominant type of motivational orientation among Arab language learners. This study survey involves a total of 103 Arabic diploma students at the Terengganu university. They are systematically chosen randomly. Questionnaires have been used to obtain data. It was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings showed that integrative motivation orientation was more dominant among the students and almost all of the students were in the integrative motivational orientation level. However, instrumental motivation is still at a high level.

Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning 40: 45-78.
Ehrman, M.E. & Oxford, R.L. (1991). Affective survey. Arlington, VA: Foreign Service Institute.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychological aspects of language learning: the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R.C. & Lambert, W.E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Teh, K.S.M., Embi, M. A., Yusoff, N.M.R.N. & Mahamod, Z. (2010). Hubungan tahap motivasi dengan strategi pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dalam kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Agama Terengganu. Jurnal Teknologi (Sains Sosial), 52: 57-67.
Al-Khuli, M.A. (1990). Bacd al-jawanib al-lughwiyyah wa al-taclimiyyah wa al-nafsiyah laday majmucah min mucalimiyy al-lughah al-carabiyyah li ghayr al-natiqin biha. In Buhuth lughawiyyah wa ‘adabiyyah, pp. 111-152. Makkah al-Mukarramah: Jamiacah Umm al-Qura.
Krashen, S.D., (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Leaver, B.L., Ehrman, M. & Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simanjuntak, M. (1982). Aspek bahasa dan pengajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Sarjana Enterprise.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Al-Otaibi, G. N. (2004). Language learning strategy use among Saudi EFL students and its relationship to language proficiency level, gender and motivation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Oxford, R.L. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal 78 (1): 12-28.
Park, S.H. (2005). Language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and English proficiency among Korean EFL students. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Kansas.

In-Text Citation: (Teh, Sulaiman, & Yusoff, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Teh, K. S. M., Sulaiman, A. A., & Yusoff, N. M. R. N. (2018). Instrumental Motivation Orientation vs Integrative among Arabic Language and Literature Diploma Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 308–314.