Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Authentic Leadership Linking Psychological Empowerment to Follower’s Behavior

Saira .

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6529

Open access

This study was conducted to empirically test how follower's organizational citizenship behavior is influenced by authentic leadership mediated by psychological empowerment. This study provides in depth understanding of the relationship between leadership styles and follower's behavior and its strong linkages with psychological empowerment of employees by developing an appropriate research design. Using a quantitative approach, a cross sectional research design was employed to examine the association between Authentic Leadership and organizational citizenship behavior mediated by psychological empowerment. The data was collected from the 200 employees of the textile sector to conduct a research analysis. Reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Pearson’s correlation and regression were applied to test the formulated hypothesis. The results revealed a statically significant relationship among all the variables proposed for this research study. The results of this research study supported the structural model where organizational citizenship behavior is strongly influenced by authentic leadership mediated by psychological empowerment. The result suggested that authentic leadership behavior should be encouraged in all organizational structures to increase the psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior among employees. As far as practical perspective is concerned, it will be helpful for organizations especially in Pakistan where top-down hierarchical control is prevailing, to shift from control to empowerment by implementing authentic leadership styles to foster the organizational citizenship behavior through the linkage of psychological empowerment.

Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
Mouton, J., & Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research. Cape Town: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 871-890.
Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2006). The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.
Castro, B. C., Armario, M. E., & Ruiz, M. D. (2004). The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalty. International journal of Service industry management, 15(1), 27-53.
Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 111-121.
Cross, R., Baker, W., & Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 51.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 580.Eagly, A. H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 459-474.
Euwema, M. C., & Emmerik, V. I. H. (2007). Intercultural competencies and conglomerated conflict behaviors in intercultural conflicts. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(4), 427-441.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The leadership quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145.
Gardner, W. L., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2004). Unleashing individual potential. Organizational dynamics, 3(33), 270-281.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. John Wiley & Sons.
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2005). Managing authenticity. harvard business review, 83(12), 85-94.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87(2), 268.
Humphrey, A. (2012). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of organizational identification. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 15(4), 247-268.
Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of management review, 30(1), 96-112.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
Jourian, T. J. (2014). Trans forming Authentic Leadership: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 2(2), 8. Journal, 38(7), 871-894. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.7.871
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and resear

In-Text Citation: (Saira, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Saira. (2019). Authentic Leadership Linking Psychological Empowerment to Follower’s Behavior. International Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 61–84.