Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Developing a Scale to Diagnose Reading Difficulties among Primary School Students in Jordan from Teachers' Point of View

Halaa Freihat, Nashaat Baioumy, Roslan Ab-Rahman, Khaled Abu Sheirah, Mohammed Marshoud

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6537

Open access

The aim of this study is to build a measure to diagnose reading difficulties among primary school students in Jordan from teachers' point of view. The study population consisted of (11513) teachers of the primary stage teachers in Jordan for the academic year (2018/2019), including (1521) male teachers and (9992) female teachers. The sample of the study comprised (484) teachers, out of them (263) male teachers and (221) female teachers. On the basis of the descriptive survey method, a questionnaire was developed to collect data. It consisted of (44) items anchored according to the Likert five-point scale. The results showed the foundations of developing a diagnostic scale for reading difficulties according to scientific bases as presented by scale One-dimensional were achieved, where the correlation coefficients between the item and the total score on the scale ranged between (0.187 - 0.471) and all are statistically significant at the level of (? ? 0.01). This is an indication of high structural validity, and the coefficient of reliability (0.855), which is a very high value. The study recommended that the concerned parties should be invited to benefit from the results of the study and detecting the level of reading difficulties among primary school students and working on building remedial plans to overcome the difficulties.

Al-Mutairi, K. (2007). The effect of the text and its teaching in accordance with the questioning strategy on the level of reading comprehension and the tendency towards reading among people with learning difficulties from primary pupils in the State of Kuwait. Unpublished Master Thesis, College of Graduate Studies, Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Badran, A. I., and Asfour, Q. N. (2013). Academic learning disabilities: Description and treatment. First edition. Dar Al Fikr Publishers and Distributors. P. 18-25.
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139-164.
Hersh, J. (2009). The Effectiveness of a concurrent multisensory educational program in developing reading skills for Dyslexic students in primary stage in Jordan. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Amman Arab University, Jordan.
Kandour, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of a problem solving program in rehabilitation of reading performance among students with learning difficulties: A field study on a sample of fourth and fifth year elementary students. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University Mohamed Lamine Debaghine -Setif2, Algeria.
Mahmoud, A. (2012). The Effectiveness of modeling and summarizing strategies in treating difficulties in reading comprehension and reducing reading anxiety in studies of girl-friendly schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 219-258.
Qashqoush, I. and Jamal, A. (2016). Psychometric characteristics of the scale of reading difficulties among children. Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 17, 173-186.
Shalabi, A. (2017). Design of a test for the detection of dyslexia for primary school children in the province of Tlemcen. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Abi Bakr Belkaid, Tlemcen, Algeria.
Suliman, A. (2010). Psychology of learning disabilities: Scholarship between development and exclusion. Dar El Wafaa for Printing & Publishing, Alexandria, Egypt.

In-Text Citation: (Freihat et al, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Freihat, H., Baioumy, N., Ab-Rahman, R., Sheirah, K. A., & Marshoud, M. (2019). Developing a Scale to Diagnose Reading Difficulties among Primary School Students in Jordan from Teachers’ Point of View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 131–143.