ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The electronic word of mouth is a hardly studied phenomenon in the Sri Lankan context. Accordingly, the present study investigates the importance of factors influencing on electronic word of mouth engagement towards consumer purchase intention. By using convenience sampling technique, 501 questionnaires were distributed among respondents between the ages of 18-50 who are using Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp resultant respond rate was 77%. The correlation and regression tests were done through the use of AMOS software, while the SPPS software was used to test reliability. The study found that trustworthiness and electronic word of mouth engagement towards purchase intention have a positive impact whereas, high fashion involvement has a negative impact to the electronic word of mouth engagement. The study is useful for retailers to improve their online presence by developing electronic word of mouth among consumers.
Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295. doi:10.2307/3149462
Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of conuumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40. doi:org/10.1002/dir.1014
Brown, J., Amanda, J., Broderick, & Nick, L. (2007 ). Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 2-20. doi:10.1002/dir.20082
Calder, B. J., & Kotler, P. (2008). Kellogg on advertising and media. Evanston: Wiley.
Chan, Y. Y. Y., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2011). Conceptualising electronic word of mouth activity : an input?process?output perspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(5), 488-516. doi:10.1108/02634501111153692
Couch, L. L., & Jones, W. H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(3), 319-336. doi:org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2186
Creekmore, A. M. (1974). Clothing Related to Body Satisfaction and Perceived Peer Self. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(11).
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word-of-mouth: promise and challenge of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424. doi:10.2139/ssrn.393042
Grewal, R., Thomas, W., Cline, & Antony, D. (2003). Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 187-197. doi:org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_01
Gu, B., Park, J., & Konana, P. (2012). Research note: the impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 182-196. doi:10.2307/23207880
Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147-167. doi:org/stable/2749167
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2003). Electronic word of mouth: motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 4(8), 51-74.
Ho, H. Y., & Chien, P. H. C. (2010). Influence of message trust in online word-of-mouth on consumer behavior –by the example of food blog International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering, 1, 395-399. doi:10.1109/ICEIE.2010.5559850
Huang, C. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Behav Soc Netw, 13(3), 241-249. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: a meta-analysis. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318-332. doi:org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006
Knox, S. (2012). Cerebral advocates: how people are wired to share and advocate.
Krejcie, V. R., & Morgan, W. D. . (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17, 425-439. doi:org/stable/23015815
Law, K. M., Zhang, Z. M., & Leung, C. S. (2004). Fashion change and fashion consumption: the chaotic perspective. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 8(4), 362-374. doi:10.1108/13612020410559966
Lin, X., Featherman, M., Brooks, S. L., & Hajli, N. (2018). Exploring gender difference in online consumer purchase decision making:an online product presentation perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-15. doi:org/10.1007/s10796-018-9831-1
Lis, B. (2013). In e-WOM we trust. a framework of factors that determine the e-WOM credibility.
In-Text Citation: (Muniweera et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Muniweera, C. D. W., Balawardhana, K. P. I. A., Rajapaksha, M. S. N., Chamara, M. A. D. S., & Jayasuriya, N. A. (2020). The Importance of Factors Influencing on e-WOM Engagement towards Consumer Purchase Intention in Clothing Retailers, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 349–360.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode