ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This study examines the factors influencing the quality of consecutive interpretation based on an interview of a skilled interpreter. The data for this research is mainly collected from a semi-structured interview. This study is a descriptive qualitative study, aiming to have an in-depth analysis of interpretation. The analysis of the data is under the framework proposed by Andrew Gillies (2019). The findings revealed several factors that influence the quality of interpretation, such as techniques on taking note, quick response, culture elements & theoretical foundation. In order to respond quickly, the interpreters should make enough preparation, make quick decisions on word choice, practice more and keep constant learning. The findings have implications on the understanding of consecutive interpretation, which could offer some practical guidance for the prospective interpreters. Moreover, the findings of the study in consecutive interpretation will help enhance business negotiations and promote cross-culture communication.
Abuarrah, S. (2018). A pragmatic framework to note-taking in consecutive interpretation. Babel, 64(3), 414-433.
Chen, S. (2017). Note-taking in consecutive interpreting: New data from pen recording. Translation & Interpreting, 9(1), 4-23.
Garzone, G. (2002): Quality and norms in interpretation. In: Giuliana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi, eds. Interpreting in 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 107-119.
Gillies, A. (2019). Consecutive interpreting: a short course. Routledge.
Gile, D. (1998). Observational studies and experimental studies in the investigation of conference interpreting. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 10(1), 69-93.
Grbi?, N. (2008). Constructing interpreting quality. Interpreting, 10 (2), 232-257.
Han, C., & Riazi, M. (2017). Investigating the effects of speech rate and accent on simultaneous interpretation: A mixed-methods approach. Across Languages and Cultures, 18(2), 237-259.
Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method-Interviewing and Observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87-88.
Liu, Minhua. (1994). Transition from preparatory exercises to consecutive interpretation: Principles and techniques. Fu Jen Studies, 27, 104-116.
Kurz, I. (2001). Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators' Journal, 46(2), 394-409.
Moser-Mercer, B. (1996). Quality in interpreting: Some methodological issues. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 7, 43-55.
Rozan, J.-F., (1956). La prise de notes en interprétation consécutive. Genève: Georg. _2002. Note-taking in Consecutive Interpreting. Kraków, Poland: Tertium (Translated from French by Andrew Gillies).
Shafiei, S., Tavakoli, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2017). Delving into Note-Taking Technique in Consecutive Interpreting: Academic Context in Focus. Translation Studies Quarterly, 14(56). Retrieved from https://journal.translationstudies.ir/ts/article/view/420
Siantova, G. (2015). Consecutive interpretation and note-taking from the perspective of some translatology schools and researchers. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology, 2(1), 44-51.
Vuai, M. M. (2017). Investigating challenges of consecutive interpreting: a case of my love film (Unpublished Phd Thesis), The Univesity of Dodoma, Tanzania.
Han, Y. (2015). An Analysis of the Influencing Factors in the Process of English-Chinese Consecutive Interpreting and Coping Strategies (Unpublished Master’s thesis), Fujian Normal University, China.
Youhua, T. (2009). Factors Influencing the Quality of the Interpretation from Chinese to Foreign Languages [J]. Journal of Mudanjiang Teachers College (Philosophy Social Sciences Edition), 3, 54-56.
In-Text Citation: (Chunli et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Chunli, Y., Mansor, N. S., Ang, L. H., & Sharmini, S. (2021). Factors Influencing the Quality of Consecutive Interpretation from the Perspective of Interpreter. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 1356-1369.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode