ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Learning engagement is a determinant for success across any learning mode, putting emphasis on the quality of the students’ participation in their own academic journey. However, this is an especially daunting challenge for open and distance learning (ODL). This is further exacerbated when the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the sudden shift to ODL mode, putting students in academic situations that they are unaccustomed to. To examine whether the engagement of tertiary-level students in Malaysia is affected by the change in learning mode, this research aims to identify indicators that make them engage as well as disengage during ODL lessons. A survey instrument known as Learner-Engagement-Technology (LET), was used to measure the level of engagement and disengagement in four categories each, namely behavioural, cognitive, emotional and social aspects. Responses from 129 undergraduates in a public higher learning institution in Malaysia were analysed. The descriptive analysis revealed that the students do engage more than disengage, albeit at a moderate level. The highest indicators of engagement and disengagement however were different. This research is part of an ongoing study and the results can help inform various stakeholders (e.g. lecturers, administrators, policy makers) of the possible causes of engagement and disengagement during ODL classes, so that a more comprehensive and decisive approach can be taken to improve the overall ODL experience for the students.
Abdous, M. (2019). Well begun is half done: Using online orientation to foster online students’ academic self-efficacy. Online Learning Journal, 23(3), 161–187. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i3.1437
Aguilar, M., Sheldon, K., Ahrens, R., & Janowicz, P. (2020). 2020: State of Engagement Report. https://www.goguardian.com/research-and-insights/
Al-Bogami, B., & Elyas, T. (2020). Promoting middle school students’ engagement through incorporating iPad apps in EFL/ESL classes. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020926570.
Alodail, A. K. (2020). Flipping learning to develop students' engagement and achievement in the computer applications unit as part of their studies on the subject of instructional design. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies [JEPS], 14(4), 593-610.
Ashwin P., & McVitty, D. (2015). The meanings of student engagement: implications for policies and practices. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi J. & Scott P. (eds) The European Higher Education Area. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_23
Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2020a). Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 957-983.
Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020b). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1).
Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2019). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 1-18.
Brown, K., & Fletcher, A. (2002). Disaffection or disruptive engagement? A collaborative inquiry into pupils' behaviour and their perceptions of their learning in modern language lessons. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 10(2), 169-192.
Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 46-58.
Coiro, J., Sekeres, D. C., Castek, J., & Guzniczak. L. (2014). Comparing the quality of third, fourth, and fifth graders’ social interactions and cognitive strategy use during structured online inquiry. Journal of Education, 194,1–15.
D'Angelo, C. (2018). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. In Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018. Pressbooks.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97– 131). Boston: Springer.
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-19.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research Spring, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002.
Gilbert, J. (2017). A study of ESL students’ perceptions of their digital reading. The reading matrix: an international online journal, 17(2), 179-195.
Gómez-Parra, M. E., & Huertas-Abril, C. A. (2019). Social media support and the need of counselling from experts in autonomous language learning. International Approaches to Bridging the Language Gap, 135.
Hansen, R. S. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for business, 82(1), 11-19.
Halverson, L. R. (2016). Conceptualizing blended learning engagement. Doctoral Dissertation. USA: Brigham Young University.
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53.
Hiar, G. (2020). Engagement in e-learning courses amongst first-year, non-traditional community college students. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. 8908.
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/8908
Kiili, C., & Leu, D. J. (2019). Exploring the collaborative synthesis of information during online reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 146–157.
Mansor, N., & Rahim, N. A. (2017). Instagram in ESL classroom. Man in India, 97(20), 107-114.
Ma, J., Cheng, J., & Han, X. (2018). Initial development process of a student engagement scale in blended learning environment. In Proceedings - 6th International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) 2017, (pp. 234–237). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.63.
Phirangee, K. (2016). Students' perceptions of learner-learner interactions that weaken a sense of community in an online learning environment. Online Learning, 20(4), 13-33.
Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457.
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2020). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-16.
Prince, M., Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2020). Active student engagement in online stem classes: Approaches and recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 8.
Sain, N., Bown, A., Fluck, A., & Kebble, P. (2017). ESL learners’ online research and comprehension strategies. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions – short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 271–276). Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578312.pdf
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-28.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Sun, S., Lee, P., Lee, A., & Law, R. (2016). Perception of attributes and readiness for educational technology: Hospitality management students’ perspectives. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 28(3), 142-154.
Wang, M.-T. T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431 .
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008.
Wang, M. T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2019). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 1-15.
In-Text Citation: (Nawi et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Nawi, S. M., Yusof, S. M., Kamaludin, P. N. H., & Sain, N. (2021). Exploring Malaysian Tertiary Students’ Behavioural, Cognitive, Emotional and Social Engagement and Disengagement in ODL. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1296–1311.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode