ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Mathematics is an important subject as a skill and foundation to further learning at the university level. In this regard, the engagement of students in the learning of mathematics is required so that mathematical knowledge and skills can be learned and mastered as much as possible. Previous study showed that student engagement, parental involvement, and peer influence affect mathematics achievement at a university. The purpose of this is to examine the relationship between mathematics achievement, the three aspect of student engagement, parental involvement, and peer influence. Data were collected from a total sample of 284 undergraduate students at a private university in Malaysia. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse the data. Mathematics achievement was positively related to cognitive engagement and affective engagement, while behavioural engagement did not affect their achievement. Parental involvement and peer influence, on the other hand, are negatively related with mathematics achievement. More studies that concentrated on the relationship between parental involvement, peer influence, and student engagement in the future are encouraged to establish students' engagement in mathematics learning that vital to increase their mathematics achievement. A qualitative study should be considered in order to obtain more information from respondents.
Zakaria, A. R., & Salleh, N. M. (2011). Konteks keluarga dan hubungannya dengan penglibatan ibu bapa dalam pendidikan anak–anak di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 36(1), 35–44.
Arshad, M., & Shahzadi, E. (2016). Parents involvement at university level education?: students perception in under developing country. European Scientific Journal, 12(22), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.19044/ esj.2016.v12n22 p294
Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., Mahmud, R., Salim, N. R., & Sulaiman, T. (2017, January). Differences in students’ mathematics engagement between gender and between rural and urban schools. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1795, No. 1, p. 020025). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.4972169
Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
Bergey, B. W., Parrila, R. K., Laroche, A., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). Effects of peer–led training on academic self–efficacy, study strategies, and academic performance for first–year university students with and without reading difficulties. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.11.001
Bobis, J., Way, J., Anderson, J., & Martin, A. J. (2016). Challenging teacher beliefs about student engagement in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857–015–9300–4
Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J., Ritzen, H., & Brand–Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001
Cazan, A. M. (2015). Learning motivation, engagement and burnout among university students. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015. 03.077
Conduit, J., Karpen, I. O., & Farrelly, F. (2016). Student engagement: A multiple layer phenomenon. In C. Plewa and J. Conduit (eds.), Making a Difference Through Marketing (pp. 229–245). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 –981–10–0464–3
Conner, T. (2016). Relationships: The key to student engagement. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijel.2016.5.1.02
Dary, T., Pickeral, T., Shumer, R., & Williams, A. (2016). Weaving student engagement into the core practices of schools. A national dropout prevention center/network position paper. National Dropout Prevention Center/Network.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self–Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2070638
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self–determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104
Deeken, C., Neumann, I., & Heinze, A. (2020). Mathematical Prerequisites for STEM Programs: What do University Instructors Expect from New STEM Undergraduates?. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00098-1
Deka, P. P. (2016). A study on parental involvement in higher level of education: Voices of parents and students in Pub–Kamrup College and Patidarrang College, Kamrup district. The Clarion–International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/ 10.5958/2277–937X.2016.00009.5
Dogan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891759
Durksen, T. L., Way, J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Motivation and engagement in mathematics: A qualitative framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13394–017–0199–1
Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher-student relationships in adolescence: A Longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074 001059
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self–report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement, 763–782. Springer. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 100(43), 5–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01. 009
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. National Society for the Study of Education, 113(1), 101–123.
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
Gerber, C., Mans–kemp, N., & Schlechter, A. (2013). Investigating the moderating effect of student engagement on academic performance. Acta Academica, 45(4), 256–274.
Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J. (2015). Independent colleges and student engagement?: descriptive analysis by institutional type. A 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Special Analysis for the Council of Independent Colleges. Council of Independent Colleges.
Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self–Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00461520.2014.989230
Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling?: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131378
Grove, M., Guiry, S., & Croft, T. (2020). Specialist and more-able mathematics students: understanding their engagement with mathematics support. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 643–668.
Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), 216–231.
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015a). Confirmation of campus-class-technology model in student engagement: A path analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 114–125. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.041
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Harper, C. E., Sax, L. J., & Wolf, D. S. S. (2012). The role of parents in college students' sociopolitical awareness, academic, and social development. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6147
Huck, S. (2012). Reading statistics and research (6. ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Ingram, N. (2013). Mathematical engagement skills. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 402–409.
Jelas, Z. M., Azman, N., Zulnaidi, H., & Ahmad, N. A. (2016). Learning support and academic achievement among Malaysian adolescents: the mediating role of student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9202-5
Kanafiah, S. F. H. M., & Jumadi, A. (2013, December). Students’ perception towards mathematics: attitudes, interests and lecturers’ teaching. In International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research, 6–7.
Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsh, M., & Hannover, B. (2014). How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educational Research, 56(2), 220–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898916
Krause, K. L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first–year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Educations, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02602930701698892
Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Shin, H., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Kikas, E., Wong, B.P., Stanculescu, E., & Basnett, J. (2016). Cultural universality and specificity of student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep. 12079
Lee, J. –S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta–analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Liu, F., Black, E., Algina, J., Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, K. (2010). The validation of one parental involvement measurement in virtual schooling. Journal of interactive online learning, 9(2), 105–132.
Lowe, K., & Dotterer, A. M. (2018). Parental involvement during the college transition: a review and suggestion for its conceptual definition. Adolescent Research Review, 3(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0058-z
Lynch, A. D., Lerner, R. M., & Leventhal, T. (2013). Adolescent academic achievement and school engagement: An examination of the role of school-wide peer culture. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9833-0
Marham, M. A., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Ahmad Tarmizi, R. (2016). Keterlibatan murid kolej vokasional berpencapaian rendah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik menerusi pendekatan ‘Q–Methodology’. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia (JPSMM UPSI), 6(1), 41–57.
Maron, A. I. (2016). Priorities of teaching mathematics in universities. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(9), 3339–3350.
Mehdinezhad, V. (2011). First year students ’ engagement at the university. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 47–66.
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011). Peer influences on academic motivation: Exploring multiple methods of assessing youths’ most “Influential” peer relationships. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 13–40. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 027243161 0384487
Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.12203 59
Othman, N., Zakaria, E., & Iksan, Z. (2014). Nilai dalam pengajaran matematik di institusi pengajian tinggi. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi, 1(2), 56–68.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 104(3), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0027268
Ribera, A. K., Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (2017). Sense of peer belonging and institutional acceptance in the first year: The role of high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Development, 58(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10. 1353/csd.2017.0042
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/a0037252
Salim, N. R., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2017). Relationship between mathematics statistics engagement and attitudes towards statistics among undergraduate students in Malaysia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1795, No. 1, p. 020026). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi. org/10.1063/1.4972170
Salmela–Aro, K., Moeller, J., Schneider, B., Spicer, J., & Lavonen, J. (2016). Integrating the light and dark sides of student engagement using person-oriented and situation-specific approaches. Learning and Instruction, 43, 61–70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2016.01.001
Salmela?Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands-resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12018
Schreiber, B., & Yu, D. (2016). Exploring student engagement practises at a South African university: Student engagement as reliable predictor of academic performance. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-5-593
Sedaghat, M., Abedin, A., Hejazi, E., & Hassanabadi, H. (2011). Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2406–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.117
Shernof, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez–Wall, L., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Student engagement as a general factor of classroom experience: Associations with student practices and educational outcomes in a university gateway course. Frontiers in psychology, 994(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00994
Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60.
Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. J. (2020). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1–25.
Soria, K. M., & Stebleton, M. J. (2012). First–generation students' academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13562517.2012.666735
Svoboda, R. C., Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Harackiewicz, J. M., & Destin, M. (2016). Understanding the relationship between parental education and STEM course taking through identity–based and expectancy–value theories of motivation. AERA Open, 2(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416664875
Syed, M., & Seiffge–Krenke, I. (2013). Personality development from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Linking trajectories of ego development to the family context and identity formation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 371–384. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030070
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Uzezi, J. G., & Deya, G. D. (2017). Relationship between peer group influence and students’ academic achievement in Chemistry at secondary school level. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-4-2
Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students? engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10. 1037/edu0000172
Wang, C. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: understanding students’ motivational processes using the self–determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019. e01983
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cdep.12073
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012a). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15327795. 2011.00753.x
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012b). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04. 001
Watt, H. M., Carmichael, C., & Callingham, R. (2017). Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education. School Psychology International, 38(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316688373
Williams, E. A., Zwolak, J. P., Dou, R., & Brewe, E. (2017). Engagement, integration, involvement: supporting academic performance and developing a classroom social network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04121.
Witkowski, P., & Cornell, T. (2015). An Investigation into Student Engagement in Higher Education Classrooms. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 56–67.
Zhang, Z., Hu, W., & McNamara, O. (2015). Undergraduate student engagement at a Chinese university: A case study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9213-x
In-Text Citation: (Bakar et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Bakar, N. A., Ayub, A. F. M., Ahmad, N. A., & Abdullah, S. I. S. S. (2021). Mathematics Achievement: The Relationship between Student Engagement, Parental Involvement, and Peer Influence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(5), 496–513.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode