Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Construction of the HoPA’S Program in Children 11 Years of Age: A Pilot Study

Nurul Diyana Sanuddin, Zulkhairi Mohd Azam, Hasmiza Abdul Majeed, Siti Aisyah binti Mazlan, Mohd Faridz Ahmad, Nurshahira Ibrahim

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i3/11259

Open access

Introduction: The alarming increase in Covid-19 cases has forced the government to implement movement control orders across the country. Due to these circumstances, the people's daily activities have been substantially affected, including those children. The pandemic has affected the children's activities, and they are unable to engage in outdoor and indoor activities. Moreover, the children's learning activities are also affected and need to be carried out through virtual education (PDPR). This virtual-based kind of learning will be more effective with guidance and support from the parents. However, this situation could lead to the feeling of stress and burdening the parents. Therefore, a systematic plan needs to be implemented to increase the children's physical activities and reduce the burden on parents during PDPR. Objective: The development of the HoPA’S Program (Home-Based Physical Activity) to increase physical activities among school children during the PDPR. In addition, the development of this program is a planned and systematic activity that will help children freely express ideas, especially in Physical Education or during Co-curriculum activities. Methodology: In this study, the validity of the content of the SPARK program is based on the construction model of Sidek and Jamaludin (2005). The HoPA’S Program content creation process begins with the objective and concludes with a draft union. In the initial stages of the content development of the program, researchers determine the purpose, objective of this program, and the appropriate types of activities that are applied to enhance the students' physical activities. Therefore, the development of the HoPA’S Program is through 2 phases, namely program construction and validity of the content. Research findings: Thus, the results of the expert assessment on HoPA’S Program contents have a high content legality value of .86. Therefore, this value can be explained that the HoPA’S Program is highly relevant to the learning and teaching process for Physical Education subjects and co-curricular activities. In conclusion, the program is expected to provide opportunities for children to undergo natural learning through cognitive, social theories that contribute to the learning and teaching process of Physical and Health Education subjects and their considerable impact on children's physical activity.

Assareha, A., & Bidokht, M., H. (2011). Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science 3, 791–795.
Baiyere, A., & Li, H. (2016). Application of a virtual collaborative environment in a teaching Case. In AMCIS 2016: Surfing the IT Innovation Wave - 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems.
Brandon, L. J., Boyette, L. W., Lloyd, A., & Gaasch, D. A. (2004). Resistive training and long-term function in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 12(1), 10–28.
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466-487.
Chin, J. J., & Ludwig, D. (2013). Increasing children's physical activity during school recess periods. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 34(5), 367-374.
Dennison, B. A., Straus, J. H., Mellitis, P., & Charney, E. (1988). Childhood physical fitness tests: Predictor of adult physical activity levels? Pediatrics, 82, 324-330.
Di Vaio, A., Boccia, F., Landriani, L., & Palladino, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the agri-food system: Rethinking sustainable business models in the COVID-19 scenario. Sustainability 12(12), 48-51.
DiBrezzo, R., Shadden, B., B., Raybon, B., H. & Powers, M. (2005). Exercise intervention designed to improve strength and dynamic balance among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 13(2), 198–209.
Doozan, A., & Bae, M. (2016). Teaching Physical Literacy to Promote Healthy Lives: TGfU and Related Approaches. The Physical Educator, 73, 471-487.
Fisher, A. (2011). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Fu, Y., Gao, Z., Hannon, J. C., Burns, R. D., & Brusseau Jr, T. A. (2016). Effect of the SPARK Program on Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Endurance, and Motivation in Middle-School Students. Journal of physical activity & health, 13(5).
Gordon-Larsen, P., Adair, L. S., Nelson, M. C., & Popkin, B. M. (2004). Five-year obesity incidence in the transition period between adolescence and adulthood: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 80, 569–575.
Gregg, E. W., Gerzoff, R. B., Caspersen, C. J., Williamson, D. F., & Narayan, K. M. V. (2003). Relationship of walking to mortality among US adults with diabetes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(12), 1440–1447.
Hastie, P. A. (2017). Revisiting the National Physical Education Content Standards: What Do We Really Know About Our Achievement of the Physically Educated/Literate Person? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(1), 3-19.
Herrick, H., Thompson, H., Kinder, J., & Madsen, K. A. (2012). Use of SPARK to Promote After?School Physical Activity. Journal of School Health, 82(10), 457-461.
Hills, A. P., Dengel, D. R., & Lubans, D. R. (2015). Supporting public health priorities: Recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 57, 368–374.
Hruda, K. V., Hicks, A. L. & McCartney, N. (2003). Training for muscle power in older adults: effects on functional abilities. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 28(2), 178–189.
Kahan, D., & McKenzie, T. L. (2017). School and neighborhood predictors of physical fitness in elementary school students. Journal of school health, 87(6), 448-456.
Landi, F., Cesari, M., Onder, G., Lattanzio, F., Gravina, E. M., & Bernabei, R. (2004). Physical activity and mortality in frail, community-living elderly patients. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, 59(8), 833–837.
Marques, A., Gómez, F., Martins, J., Catunda, R., & Sarmento, H. (2017). Association between physical education, school-based physical activity, and academic performance: a systematic review (Asociación entre la educación física, la actividad física en la escuela, y el rendimiento académico: una revisión sistemática). Retos, (31), 316-320.
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Kolody, B., & Faucette, N. (1997). Long-term effects of a physical education curriculum and staff development program: SPARK. Research. Res Q Exerc Sport. 68, 280–291.
Naderipour, A., Abdul-Malek, Z., Ahmad, N. A., Kamyab, H., Ashokkumar, V., Ngamcharussrivichai, C., & Chelliapan, S. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 virus on reducing GHG emission and increasing energy generated by renewable energy sources: A brief study in Malaysian context. Environmental technology & innovation, 20, 1-8.
Pate, R. R., Trost, S. G., Dowda, M., Ott, A. E., Ward, D. S., Saunders, R., & Felton, G. (1999). Tracking of physical activity, physical inactivity, and health-related physical fitness in rural youth. Pediatric Exercise Science, 11, 364-376.
Pavon, D. J., & Baeza, A. C. (2020). Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: Special focus in older people. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 63, 386?388.
Pedersen, B. K., & Saltin, B. (2006). Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 16(1), 3–63.
Puggaard, L. (2003). Effects of training on functional performance in 65, 75 and 85-year-old women: experiences deriving from community-based studies in Odense, Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 13(1), 70–76.
Robertson-Wilson, J., Baker, J., Derbyshire, E., & Côté, J. (2003). Childhood Physical Activity Involvement in Active and Inactive Female Adults. Tracing Physical Activity, 9(1)1 – 8.
Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Alcaraz, J. E., Kolody, B., Faucette, N., & Hovell, M. F. (1997). The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids. American Journal of Public Health, 87(8), 1328-1334.
Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R., N. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: The group comparison between male and female. Qual Quant. 1-22.
Sherwood, N. E., & Jeffery, R. W. (2000). The behavioral determinants of exercise: Implications for physical activity interventions. Annual Review of Nutrition, 20, 21–44.
Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Whelton, A., White, W. B., Bello, A. E., Puma, J. A., & Fort, J. G. (2002). Effects of celecoxib and rofecoxib on blood pressure and edema in patients ?65 years of age with systemic hypertension and osteoarthritis. American Journal of Cardiology, 90(9), 959–963.

In-Text Citation: (Sanuddin et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Sanuddin, N. D., Azam, Z. M., Majeed, H. A., Mazlan, S. A. binti, Ahmad, M. F., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Construction of the HoPA’S Program in Children 11 Years of Age: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(3), 822–829.