Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Perception of Students and Staff on Determinants of Performance in Science Laboratory Technology in Institutes of Technology in Southern Nyanza Region, Kenya

Dorcas Akinyi Ojera, E. M. W. Simatwa, T. M. O. Ayodo

Open access

Science Laboratory Technology training is considered pivotal to Kenya’s economy, as it is increasingly seen as a vehicle through which the country will build a competitive workforce for key industries within priority sectors identified in Vision 2030. The objective of this article was to find out the contribution of library facilities on performance of students in Science Laboratory Technology in Institutes of Technology in Institutes of Technology in South Nyanza, Kenya. Despite the importance of Science Laboratory Technology, students’ performance in Institutes of Technology in South Nyanza, Kenya has been below expectations. For the period between 2006-2010, cumulative performance in Science Laboratory Technology course in Kenya National Examinations has been; Distinction 0 (0%), Credit 15 (2.63%); Pass 61 (10.63%); Referred 219 (38.29%); and 277 (48.45%) failed. This dismal performance has led to growing concern among stakeholders. The instruments for data collection were questionnaires, interview schedules, document analysis and observation. A conceptual framework was used to guide the study on factors that determine performance in Science Laboratory Technology. The study adopted descriptive survey design. The study population consisted of 240 students undergoing the Science Laboratory Technology course, 26 lecturers, 3 Librarians and 3 Principals. Simple random sampling technique was used to select 120 students and 18 lecturers while saturated sampling technique was used to select the 3 Principals, 3 librarians and 3 laboratory assistants. It is hoped that this article will provide a basis for future research in the education sector particularly the Institutes of Technology. The Ministry of Higher Education Science and Technology may also use this study to re-evaluate the criteria for student admission into the course Science Laboratory Technology.

Ainley, J. (2000). Students views on their schools. Psychological Bulletin. 21, 5-16
Akelo-Misori, M. T. (2008). Higher education is ripe for reform. The Standard Newspaper, p.6, Nairobi, Kenya.
Akanle, O. B. (2007). Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Students Academic Performance
in Nigeria; Some Explanation from a Local Survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.32,28-30.
Chunghwa, W. B. (2000). Technology Education and World Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Education in Africa. The Journal of Educational Administration 16,40-46.
Cohen, L., & Manon, L. (1997).Research methods in education, 4th edition, Guidford Melbourn publishers.
Cybusky, W., Wayne, A. J., & Sweetland, D. (2004). The role of collective efficacy of teachers, and fiscal efficiency in student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration.5, 439-461.
Danesty, A. H. (2004). Psychosocial determinants of academic performance and vocational
learning of students with disabilities in Oyo State. Unpublished Doctor of philosophyThesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (2000). Recruiting teachers for the 21st century: The foundations for educational equity. Journal of Negro Education.3, 254-279.
De Jager, K. (2002). Successful students; Does the library make a deference in the performance measurements and merits? Journal of Educational Administration.3,140-144
Drennan, L., & Beck, M. (2001).Teaching quality performance indicators:key influences on the UK universities' scores. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 9, 92-102.
Fraenkline, W. (2004). Principals and students perceptions on school resouce management Journal of Educational Management.6,47-59.
Freeman, S., O'Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed Active Learning Increases Performance in Introductory Biology. Journal of life esciences: Cell Biology. 6, 132–139.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). EducationalRresearch; An introduction. 8th Edition. New York, U.S.A. Zondervan publishers.
Gay, L. R. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. 3rd Edition, Kingsway publications.
Griffith, J., (2004). Relation of principal transformational leadership to school staff job Satisfaction, staff turnover and school performance. Journal of Educational Administration. 42, 194-254.
Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H., & Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual Characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration. 46,(3). 332-352.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education; foundations for
the 21st century. Scientific reports Journal 45(4).23-34. Department of science technology, Institute of Science Education, Israel.
Koul, L. (2004). Methodology of educational research; 3rd edition. New Delhi, Wishwa Prakashan publications.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational Conditions: Student’s engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration 13, (5) 231-264.
Linn, C. M. (2007). The role of laboratory in science learning, Special issue. Elementary
School Journal. 97, (4). 401- 417.
MacLennan, A. (2008). Research in Technical Training Colleges. Journal of Education and Training 50, (1) 33-39
Mercer, J. (2005). Challenging appraisal orthodoxies; Teacher evaluation and professional development in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Personal Evaluation in Education
2 (1) 19-42.
Mortimore, P. (2002), ``High performing schools and school improvement''.Journal of Educational Administration 53,(6).47-49.
Mugenda, A. G. (2008). Social ScienceRresearch: Theory and principles. Applied research and training. Nairobi, Kenya. Services publishers
Musakali, O. D., & Mutula, M. S. (2007). Internet adoption and assimilation in Kenya Universities libraries. Library review, Journal of Educational Management 56(6).464- 475.
Ngware, M. W., Wamukuru, D. K., & Odebero, S. O. (2006). Total quality management in secondary schools in Kenya; Extent and practice. Journal of Educational Management 14,(4),39-36
Odhiambo, G. (2008). Elusive search for quality education: The case of quality assurance and
teacher accountability. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(7)34-254
Okemwa, E. (2000). Training needs of practicing professional librarians in the Kenyan public university libraries: A critical analysis..Journal of Library Management. 21.(5). 257-268
Oliver, R. H., Kersten, H., Vinkka-Puhakka, G., Alpasan, D., Bearn,I., Cema, E., Delap, P., Dummer, J. P., Goulet, T., Gugushe, E., Jeniati,V., Jerolimov, N., Kotsanos, S., Krifka, G., Levy, M., Neway, T., Ogawa,M., Saag, A., Sidlauskas, U., Skaleric, M. Vervoorn, Y. & White, D. (2008). Curriculum structure: principles and strategy, S 2.1, Journal compilation, Blackwell Munksgaard and The American Dental Education Association, European Journal of Dental Education ISSN 1396-5883 (Suppl. 1), 74–84
Oplatka, I. (2004). Principalship in developing countries; Context, characteristics and reality
Journal of Comparative Education, 40( 3).423-456
Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behavior on instructional practice
and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration. 40,( 5).447-467.
Reynolds, W. S. (2000). An analysis of factors that influence student performance; a fresh
approach to an old debate. Journal of educational management. 43,(2) 134-415.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high
school preparation. Journal of Science Education 85, 111–136.
Schneider, M. (2003), “Linking school facility conditions to teacher satisfaction and success”, National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities available at < www.edfacilities,org/pubs/teachersurvey.pdf.(a)gmail.com> accessed on 30/10/2011 9;30am
Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2005). America's lab report: Investigations on high school science. Committee report on High School Science Laboratories; Role and Vision, National Research Council.
Soto, J. G., & Sulekha-Anand, S. (2009). Factors influencing academic performance of Students enrolled in a lower division Cell Biology core course. Journal of the Scholarship,Teaching and Learning, 9, (1),. 64 – 80.
Tsang, M. C. (2000). “Cost analysis and educational policy making; A review of cost studies in Education in developing countries. Review of Educational Research. 58, 181-30
UNESCO. (2004). Developing Technical and Vocational Education in Sub – Saharan Africa.
Wanzare, Z., & Ward, K. L. (2002) Rethinking Staff development in Kenya. Agenda for the 21St Centaury, International Journal of Educational Management 14(6), 265 – 275.
Wayne, J., & Young, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement. Journal of Educational Research 73. (2). 89-122.
Wolliams, J., Lloyd, M., & Spenger, J. D. (2006). The case for sustainable laboratories: First steps at Harvard university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 6 (4) 363-382.
Woobman, L. (2003). Schooling resource; Educational institutions and student performance the International evidence. Backwell Educational publishers. Institute of economic Research, Munich, Germany.

In-Text Citation: (Ojera et al., 2012)
To Cite this Article: Ojera, D. A., Simatwa, E. M. W., & Ayodo, T. M. O. (2012). Perception of Students and Staff on Determinants of Performance in Science Laboratory Technology in Institutes of Technology in Southern Nyanza Region, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(4), 47–60.