Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

A Board Game for The Study of Employment Income

Fatimah Alwi, Siti Marlia Shamsudin, Norul Akma Mansor

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i11/15110

Open access

This paper discusses on the needs and the process of developing a board game for employment income, which is a topic in a taxation course in an accounting program. The employment income is a complicated topic and has significant marks allocated in the syllabus. Therefore, it is vital for the accounting students to have a good comprehension in this topic. The board game is known as Spin N Go Board Game 2.0 uses the Serious Game Design Assessment Framework (SGDA Framework), established by Mitgutsch and Alvarado (2012) in its development. Six components make up this framework: the objective, the content, the framing, the mechanics, the fiction or story, and the aesthetics or graphics. In order to test for its validity, a number of students were invited to play the board game. A five-Likert-Scale survey using the SGDA Framework was constructed in order to sought feedback from the students. Among the feedbacks were this game was enjoyable and able to engage students more to learn the employment income. However, there was also a suggestion to make this game to be more complicated which indicates that this board game was too simple for undergraduates. In the future, more improvements will be carried out before the Spin N Go Board Game is suitable for commercialisation.

Alwi, F., Mansor, N. A., Shamsudin, S. M., Baharom, S. N., & Khalil, M. I. (2020). The Design of Spin N Go Board Game as a Game-Based Learning for Employment Income, Proceeding of the 36th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), 5446-5455.
Bangalee, V., Oosthuizen, F., Perumal-Pillay, V. A., Suleman, F., and Walters, F. (2020). Pharmacy Students Experience with PharmacyPhlash - A Pilot Educational Board Game. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Vol. 13, pp. 292-301.
Cardinot, A., and Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-Based Learning to Engage Students with Physics and Astronomy Using a Board Game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 9(1), pp. 42-57. doi:10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104
Chan, K., Wan, K., and King, V. (2021). Performance Over Enjoyment? Effect of Game-Based Learning Outcome and Flow Experience. Original Research, Vol.6. pp. 1-10. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.660376.
Hanus, M. D., and Fox, J. (2015). Assessing The Effects of Gamification in The Classroom: A Longitudinal Study on Intrinsic Motivation, Social Comparison, Satisfaction, Effort and Academic Performance.
Chan, K., Wan, K., and King, V. (2021). Performance over Enjoyment? Effect of Game-Based Learning on Learning Outcome and Flow Experience. Frontiers in Education, Vol. 6. pp. 1-10.
Kim, J., Wi, J., Jang, S., & Kim, Y. (2020). Sequential Recommendations on Board-Game Platforms. Symmetry, Vol. 12(2), 1-15.
Luchi, K. C. G., Cardozo, L. T., and Marcondes, F. K. (2019). Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study. AJP Advances in Physiology Education. 43(2), 149-154.
Marklund, B. B., and Taylor, A-S.A. (2016). Educational Games in Practice: The Challenges Involved in Conducting A Game-Based Curriculum. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Vol. 14(2). pp. 122- 136.
Mitgutsch, K., & Alvarado, N. (2012). “Purposeful by Design? A Serious Game Design Assessment Framework,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 121-128.
Pohl, M., Rester, M., and Judmaeir, P. (2009). Interactive Game Based Learning: Advantages and Disadvantages. Springer. pp.92-101.
Severengiz, M., Seliger, G., KrUger, J. (2020). Serious Game on Factory Planning for Higher Education. Procedia Manufacturing 43, 239–246.

In-Text Citation: (Alwi et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Alwi, F., Shamsudin, S. M., & Mansor, N. A. (2022). A Board Game for The Study of Employment Income. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 1175 – 1187.