A Gender Investigation on Malaysian Learners’ Academic Online Discourse

Atai, M. R., & Chahkandi, F. (2012). Democracy in computer-mediated communication: Gender, communicative style, and amount of participation in professional listservs. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 881-888. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.007
Bazid, N. I., & Umar, I. N. (2014). Students’ Level of Participation, Critical Thinking, Types of
Action and Influencing Factors in Online Forum Environment. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 8(12), 3685-3689.
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional
distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299-316. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
Bruns, J. A. (2010). Democratic or Gendered Domain: Communication and Learning Styles in the Online Classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1256&context=etds
Burtis, S. M. (2017). Gender differences in discussion strategies of asynchronous online
undergraduate psychology major dents (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Carpenter, P. (2006). Cyber connections across age and gender differences: How communication technologies enhance social communication in learning communities in online college courses (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4904/1/etd.pdf
Cerezo, R., Sanchez-Santillan, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Nunez, J. C. (2016). Students' LMS
interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among The Five
Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
Du, J., Ge, X., & Xu, J. (2015). Online collaborative learning activities: The perspectives of African American female students. Computers & Education, 82, 152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.014
Graddy, D. (2019). Gender and Online Discourse in the Principles of Economics. Online Learning.
Guerra, E. I. (2015). Talking or typing?: gender differences in communication patterns of face to face versus online courses (Master's thesis).
Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Learners’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2240-2255. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.004
Herring, S. C. (1992). Gender and participation in computer-mediated linguistic discourse. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Philadelphia, PA.
Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication 3, 5-10.
Herring, S. C. (1994). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: bringing
familiar baggage to the new frontier [online]. Retrieved from
http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Gender_issues/cmc_and_gend
Herring, S. C. (1996). Posting in a different voice. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on
computer-mediated communication. New York, NY: State University of NY Press. R Retrieved from http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/herring.html.
Herring, S. C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information
Society, 15(3), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/019722499128466
Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. CPSR Newsletter,
18(1). Retrieved from http://www.cpsr.org/issues/ womenintech/herring /view?searchterm=Herring).
Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. The handbook of language
and gender, 202-228.
Herring, S. C., & Stoerger, S. (2013). Gender and (A)nonymity in Computer-Mediated
Communication. (In press, 2013). In J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff, & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Gender, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovikj, V. (2020, September). Gender differences in online learning. ICT Innovations 2020 Conference. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/9485
Kapidzic, S., & Herring, S. C. (2011). Gender, communication, and self-presentation in teen chat rooms revisited: Have patterns changed? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 39–59. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01561.x/full
Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students
become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17-48.
Lin, Y., Dowell, N., Godfrey, A., Choi, H., & Brooks, C. (2019, March). Modeling gender dynamics in intra and interpersonal interactions during online collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 431-435).
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research
themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162-177. doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
Morante, A., Djenidi, V., Clark, H., & West, S. (2017). Gender differences in online participation: Examining a history and a mathematics open foundation online course. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(2), 266-293.
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Chang, S., & Balbo, S. (2012). Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between learners and discussion facilitators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 684-702. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.835
Pramela, K. (2010). Participation in online forums: Some insight of Malaysian distance
learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 181–192
Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender?related differences in computer?mediated communication and computer?supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 393-409.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00224.x
Sandelowski, M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res. Nurs.
Health 2010; 33: 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
Stone, A. S. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the end of the mechanical age.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sullivan, F. R., Kapur, M., Madden, S., & Shipe, S. (2015). Exploring the role of ‘Gendered
discourse styles in online science discussions’. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 484-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.994113
Tannen, D. (1991). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation (pp. 1990-1990). London: Virago.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Touchstone.
Tomai, M., Mebane, M. E., Rosa, V., & Benedetti, M. (2014). Can computer supported
collaborative learning (CSCL) promote counter-stereotypical gender communication styles in male and female university students?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4384-4392. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.952
Xia, C., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion
forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 97-113.
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Online Learning
Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 12–22.
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers & Education, 84, 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008

In-Text Citation: (Wab, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Wab, R. A. (2022). A Gender Investigation on Malaysian Learners’ Academic Online Discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4), 449–459.

Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode