Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Analyzing"Our Arabic language Textbooks’’ of the Last Grade of Primary Stage with Reference to Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Objectives

Zakariya Abu – Dabat

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i2/1735

Open access

This study is aimed at analyzing the contents of ‘Our Arabic Language’ Textbooks for 4th, 5th, and 6th grades of the primary stage in Jordan, also studying and examining the questions employed in the Textbooks. In this respect the main aim was to examine those questions covered the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. From the main aim five questions arise to be answered.

Referring to the questions, the results of the study showed that the contents of the Textbooks (the scope of the study) was consistent with the general aims of teaching and learning the Arabic Language in the upper grade of the primary stage. The results of the study also indicated that there was an overemphasise on the lower level questions in the textbooks.

The number of questions and their percentages were tending to lower level of Blooms Taxonomy of Cognitive Domains. The number of the questions in ‘Our Arabic Language’ was 1283, distributed to the six levels of ‘Bloom’s Taxonomy. The highest number was knowledge level which were 596 questions with 46.45% of the percentages of the whole levels, whereas the questions of comprehensive were 196 with 15.27%, application 148 with 11.52%, syntheses 125 with 9.74%, analysis 114 with 8.88% and Evaluation at the end of the Taxonomy. The number of the questions devoted to the evaluation was 104 with 8.14%

According to the results, educational processes in teaching Arabic Language in this stage is still in its’ lowest standard. In this case, pupils’ performance will be negatively affected and lose the achievement of higher cognitive tasks. Despite that, the results showed that the outcomes of the contents, general aims and specific objectives were sufficient for pupils’ needs in this stage. The study proved that the taxonomy levels percentages were consistent with the standard percentages as shown in the tables 3, 4 and 5. Again It means that the number of questions and percentages were satisfactory and help the pupils to achieve the specific objectives of ‘Our Arabic Language’ in the four grades. However, teachers and educators should use Blooms Taxonomy to encourage higher- order thought in their pupils by building up from lower level cognitive skills.

Airasian, P. W. (2000). Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and BaconI.SBN.978-08013-1903-7.
Alul, F. M. (2000) Analyzing English Textbooks Questions for the elementary eight grade in Palestine based on Bloom’s Textbooks of Educational Goals of the Cognitive Domain. Master Thesis. University of Jordan. Amman
Aslan, C. (2011) High Level Thinking Education in Mother Tongue Textbooks in Turkey and France. The Journal of International Social Research.4 (16).29-37
Atkin, J. M. (1968) Behavioural Objectives in Curriculum Design. A Cautionary note. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Bednarz, S. (2011) Textbooks Questions to support spatial Thinking Differences in spatiality by Question Location. Journal of Geography.110.70-8-
Bloon, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Bloom, B. S. (1994). "Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy”. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education 93 (2). ISSN I744-7984.
Bobbitt, F. (1918). The Curriculum. Boston, Houghton, Mifflin
Bobbitt, F. (1924) How to make a Curriculum. Boston, Houghton, Mifflin
Edgers, S. (1976) Teaching Practice, Problems and Perspectives. Methuen and Co. ltd.
IsmaIl, D. (2009) Analysis of Turkish Secondary History Examination Questions According to cognitive Levels.New Educational Reiew, Vol.17. Issue 1. P.295-304
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964) Taxonomy of Educational objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook 2. The affective domain, New York. David Mckay Company
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. An overview. Theory into practice (Rutledge) 41.ISSN 00405841
Klibard, H. (1968). Curriculum Objectives and Evaluation. a Reassessment. The High School Journal. London.
Larence, S. (1978) an Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Heinemann London
Ministry of Education. (1979) Educational News Journal Amman-Jordan (Arabic Text)
Mohamad, Abdul-Mawgoud. The Artistic Foundations of the Educational Aims. (1974) Faculty of Education Magazine Tripoli - Libya 4th ed.(Arabic Text)

In-Text Citation: (Dabat, 2015)
To Cite this Article: Dabat, Z. A. (2015). Analyzing"Our Arabic language Textbooks’’ of the Last Grade of Primary Stage with Reference to Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Objectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(2), 77–93.