ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Massive Open Online Courseware (MOOCs) are an online education tool that has gained a lot of popularity, especially in higher education institutions (HEIs). MOOCs offer a new alternative for education and can support lifelong learning, self-directed learning, and educational information which require for constant use. Studies on MOOCs are frequently found in HEIs, although there are still a lot of gaps in the available studies. From a theoretical perspective, little is known about which factors promote MOOC acceptance and use in online learning contexts. This study focus on examining empirical studies of MOOC acceptance and use and identifying factors affecting MOOC acceptance and use by applying the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). First, a review was conducted of empirical research publications on MOOC that had been published in 2 specialised journals between 2012 and 2021. Second, a critical analysis of 10 studies investigating factors aiding or impeding MOOC acceptance and use was conducted. The study revealed that among six constructs of the UTAUT2, “Hedonic Motivation” was the most important factor in influencing MOOC acceptance and use, while “Facilitating Condition” was the major barrier. This study also makes significant theoretical contribution by extending UTAUT2 with a new variable namely personal innovativeness (PI) in the domain of information technology (IT). In conclusion, limitations of the study were reviewed in detail, and recommendations for future research were given.
Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.
Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306-1321.
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Lal, B., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: Examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 20(2), 145–157.
Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50.
Al-shami, S. A., Aziz, H., & Rashid, N. (2018). The adoption of MOOC utilization among undergraduate students in Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTEM). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(6S), 2634-2654.
Amid, A., & Din, R. (2021). Acceptance and use of massive open online courses: Extending UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness. Journal of Personalized Learning, 4(1), 57-66.
Arain, A. A., Hussain, Z., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2019). Extending UTAUT2 toward acceptance of mobile learning in the context of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 659-673.
Assaker, G., Hallak, R., & El-Haddad, R. (2020). Consumer usage of online travel reviews: Expanding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 model. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 26(2), 149-165.
Blum-Smith, S., Yurkofsky, M. M., & Brennan, K. (2021). Stepping back and stepping in: Facilitating learner-centered experiences in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 160, 104042.
Brown, G. T., Gavin, T. L., Glasswell, K. & Harland, D. (2004). Accuracy in the scoring or writing: studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing Assessment System. Assessing Writing, 9, 105-121.
Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS quarterly, 399-426.
Chaveesuk, S., Khalid, B., Bsoul-Kopowska, M., Rosta?ska, E., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2022). Comparative analysis of variables that influence behavioral intention to use MOOCs. Plos one, 17(4), e0262037.
Din, R. (2018). Soal selidik penerimaan dan penggunaan MOOC menggunakan platform open learning. [11 April 2018].
Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in human behavior, 49, 272-281.
Dutta, D. K., Gwebu, K. L. & Wang, J. (2015). Personal innovativeness in technology, related knowledge and experience, and entrepreneurial intentions in emerging technology industries: A process of causation or effectuation? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 529–555.
El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743-763.
Echeng, R., Usoro, A., & Majewski, G. (2013). Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Web 2.0 Technologies in the Learning Environment of Nigeria: A Conceptual Framework. International Conference on e-Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited.
Evseeva, L. I., Shipunova, O. D., Pozdeeva, E. G., Trostinskaya, I. R., & Evseev, V. V. (2020). Digital learning as a factor of professional competitive growth. In T. Antipova & Á. Rocha (Eds.), Digital Science 2019. DSIC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1114, 241–251. Springer.
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329-348.
Fianu, E., Blewett, C. & Ofori, K. S. (2018). Factors affecting MOOC usage by students in selected Ghanaian Universities. Education Sciences, 8(2), 70.
Goto, J., & Munyai, A. (2022). The acceptance and use of online learning by law students in a South African University: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model. The African Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 3.
He, T., & Zhu, C. (2017). Digital informal learning among Chinese university students: the effects of digital competence and personal factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-19.
Hidalgo, F. J. P., & Abril, C. A. H. (2020). MOOCs: Origins, concept and didactic applications: A systematic review of the literature (2012–2019). Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(4), 853-879.
Huang, C, Y., & Kao, Y, S. (2015). UTAUT2 based predictions of factors influencing the technology acceptance of Phablets by DNP. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1-23.
Huang, X. (2018). Social media use by college students and teachers: an application of UTAUT2 [Doctoral dissertation]. Walden University.
Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model. Information & management, 48(1), 1-8.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for information systems, 752–780.
Lee, Y. H., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 561–579.
Lewis, C. C., Fretwell, Ch., Ryan, J., & Parham, J. B. (2013). Faculty use of established and emerging technologies in higher education: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 22–34.
Lim, C. L., Tang, S. F., & Ravichandran, P. (2017). A Study on the Mediation Effects of Intention to Enroll in MOOCs on its Actual Usage. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning, 30-33.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G. and Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705–737.
Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2018). Reconceptualizing learning in the digital age: The [un]democratizing potential of MOOCs. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/ book/10.1007%2F978-981-10-8893-3.
Mafraq, H., & Kotb, Y. (2019). Maarefh-Proposed MOOCs' Platform for Saudi Arabia's Higher Education Institutions. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 77-82.
Marangunic, N., Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 81–95.
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
Meet, R. K., Kala, D., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOC in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model. Education and InformationTechnologies, 1-23.
Mohan, M. M., Upadhyaya, P., & Pillai, K. R. (2020). Intention and barriers to use MOOCs: An investigation among the post graduate students in India. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5017-5031.
Nasef, E. M. M., Zainuddin, N. M. M., Ibrahim, R., & Shariff, S. A. (2019). Proposed Model of Students Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses. Open International Journal of Informatics, 7(Special Issue 2), 179-189.
Raman, A., & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157-164.
Tseng, T. H., Lin, S., Wang, Y. S., & Liu, H. X. (2022). Investigating teachers’ adoption of MOOCs: the perspective of UTAUT2. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 635-650.
Van-der-Heijden, H. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695–704.
Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & education, 50(3), 838-852.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–205.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Wang, K., & Zhu, C. (2019). MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: students’ participation, experience and learning performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-18.
Wu, T. (2019). An Analysis of Characteristics and Typical Projects of Task-Based Massive Open Online Courses (tMOOC). In 2019 International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME), 424-430.
Yang, S. (2013). Understanding undergraduate students' adoption of mobile learning model: A perspective of the extended UTAUT2. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(10), 969.
Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C. & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs. CSCW '15 Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing.
Zhong, S. H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). A computational investigation of learning behaviors in MOOCs. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(5), 693-705.
Amid, A., & Din, R. (2024). A Review Studies on Acceptance and Use of MOOCs in HEIs: Applying UTAUT2. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 5034–5049.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode