Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Needs Assessment in Implementation of Fink’s Taxonomy Through Functionality of the Quadruple Helix Model

Patronella William Yaw, Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20984

Open access

The primary focus of education is to generate a meaningful learning experience that can bring about lasting changes in the learners. Research and innovation that generate new knowledge require needs assessment as evidence for these discoveries. This paper aims to elucidate the role of needs assessment based on the Quadruple Helix Model in the context of implementing the Fink Taxonomy. The emphasis is placed on the four main pillars, namely government, industry, community, and academic institutions. The synergy between the four pillars of the Quadruple Helix Model and the six dimensions of the Fink Taxonomy creates an effective framework for shaping needs assessment for transformative learning. Needs assessment is a process to identify the gap between the current state and the desired state to determine requirements. This assessment aims to identify gaps, prioritize resources, make evidence-based decisions, and foster continuous improvement. The role of the four stakeholders is crucial in framing needs as a strong foundation in the educational context. The limitations of implementing the Fink Taxonomy needs assessment include reaching consensus and power imbalances among the four stakeholders in the Quadruple Helix Model. Understanding the implications of the Quadruple Helix Model and the role of needs assessment in implementing the Fink Taxonomy fosters cooperation among government, industry, academic experts, and the community, promoting innovation, and ensuring sustainability in student learning outcomes. Further research suggestions could include concept development through exploring innovative methodologies and developing new approaches to needs assessment, such as exploring advanced data analysis and artificial intelligence, integrating stakeholder perspectives in needs assessment planning from different sectors, and integrating technology into the implementation of the Fink Taxonomy by exploring effective digital tools or platforms to create interactive and engaging learning experiences in line with Fink's taxonomy principles.

Agyei, D. D. (2020). The Impact of Educational Technology Initiatives on Student Learning Outcomes: Perspectives of Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 8(7), 43-62.
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25: 5261-5280.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Anjum, S. (2020). Impact of internship programs on professional and personal development of business students: a case study from Pakistan. Future Business Journal, 6(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-019-0007-3
Benge, M., Harder, A., & Warner, L. (2019). Conducting the Needs Assessment #1: Introduction 1. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/WC340
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int. J. Technology Management, 46: 201–234.
Cheong, K. C., Hill, C., & Leong, Y. C. (2016). Malaysia’s Education Policies and the Law of Unintended Consequences. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 5(2), 73-85.
Cuiccio, C., & Husby-Slater, M. (2018). Needs Assessment Guidebook: Supporting the Development of District and School Needs Assessments. State Support Network.
Dean, P. J., & Ripley, D. E. (2016). Chapter 9: Roger Kaufman, PhD: The Needs Assessment Audit. In Performance Improvement, 55(7): 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21606
Dwiyanti, V., Ana, A., & Widianingsih, I. (2018). Industrial Education Impact on Vocational Student Socal Skills. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 2: 98-103
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3: 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hamada, D., Nakayama, M., & Saiki, J. (2020). Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(48): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00248-z
Kamaruzzaman, K. (2021). Aktivisme Sosial dan Pemerkasaan Penglibatan Masyarakat dalam Era Media Baharu. E-Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Islam Dan Sains 2021, 18–34.
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2020). Pelan Tindakan Keusahawanan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi 2021-2025: Memartabatkan Keusahawanan Dalam Memperkasakan Negara.
Krueger, K. P., Russell, M. A., & Bischoff, J. (2011). Instructional Design and Assessment: A Health Policy Course Based on Fink’s Taxonomy of Significant Learning. American Journal Of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(1): 1–7.
Landemore, H. (2012). Collective Wisdom: Old and New. In Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846427.001
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
Loweth, R. P., Daly, S. R., Liu, J., & Sienko, K. H. (2020). Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2): 712–731.
McCawley, P. F. (2009). Methods for Conducting an Educational Needs Assessment: Guidelines for Cooperative Extension System Professionals.
Montero, C. S., & Leite, L. O. (2022). Towards Local Community Involvement in Students’ Science Learning: Perspective of Students and Teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 21-43.
Senin, M. A., Halim, H., & Ramdzan Ali, A. A. E. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Education in Malaysia: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(3): 631–637.
Wong, M. A. M. S., Harun, N. H., Moidin, S., & Mamat, N. (2022). Mengadaptasi Tanggungjawab Sosial Korporat dari Sudut Filantropi oleh Hotel Patuh Syariah di Malaysia: Satu Kerangka Konsep. Journal of Islamic Philanthropy & Social Finance, 4(1): 1–13.
N, R. (2022). The implication of interdisciplinary approach in education – An exploratory study. GBS Impact: Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research, 8(2): 28–39. https://doi.org/10.58419/gbs.v8i2.822203
Nzuva, S. M. (2022). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Promoting Business Growth and Sustainability in the Hospitality Industry. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(23): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i2330739
Pang, E., Wong, M., Leung, C. H., & Coombes, J. (2019). Competencies for fresh graduates’ success at work: Perspectives of employers. Industry and Higher Education, 33(1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218792333
Park, Y., Lim, D. H., Kim, W., & Kang, H. (2020). Organizational Support and Adaptive Performance: The Revolving Structural Relationships between Job Crafting, Work Engagement, and Adaptive Performance. Sustainability, 12(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124872
Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019). Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. She Ji, 5(2): 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002
Smart, J. (2019). Needs assessment: Families and Children Expert Panel project resource. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Teach For Malaysia. (2021). Our Impact: Nine Years of Teach For Malaysia. Teach For All: A Global Network & Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Villarroel, V., Benavente, M., Chuecas, J. M., & Bruna, D. (2020). Experiential learning in higher education. A student-centered teaching method that improves perceived learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5): 1–16.
Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, Inc.

(Yaw & Matore, 2024)
Yaw, P. W., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2024). Needs Assessment in Implementation of Fink’s Taxonomy Through Functionality of the Quadruple Helix Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2558–2577.