Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

The Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students’ in Southern Thailand

Hareesol Khun- Inkeeree, Mohd Sofian Omar- Fauzee, Mohamad Khairi Haji Othman

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v5-i3/2208

Open access

The investigation on performance between public and primary school pupils in southern Thailand is still unjustifiable due to lack of research and interest among scholars and researchers. Although the efforts by Thai government to increase the performance level of public school students had increased through budget allocation, however it is yet to be justifiable. Thus, this study examines the difference in performance between private and public schools in Thailand. A total of 100 students from both government and private primary school were examined. The result from the analysis posited that private schools perform better than public schools. An ANOVA is use to compare the difference between two public schools and one private school, where private school shows better performance, as compare to public school. However, the lower income family in public school scored higher than higher income family. The limitations and recommendations were also discussed in this paper.

Afari, E. (2013). Examining the factorial validity of the attitudes towards mathematics inventory (ATMI) in the United Arab Emirates: Confirmatory factor analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 15-29.
Al-Duwaila, A. (2012). A comparative study between Kuwait’s Government and Private Sector Primary Schools in methods of teaching and pupils’ achievement in mathematics (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University).
Antecol, H., Eren, O., & Ozbeklik, S. (2012). The effect of teacher gender on student achievement in primary school: evidence from a randomized experiment.
Berkely Parent Network (2009). Parents’ Involvement in Private Schools. Retrieved 12th February,2016.http://parentberkelyedu /recommended/schools/parentinvolve.html.
Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. NCES 2006-461. National Center for Education Statistics.
Dayio?lu, M., & Türüt-A?ik, S. (2007). Gender differences in academic performance in a large public university in Turkey. Higher Education, 53(2), 255-277.
Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2003). The effectiveness of public and private schools from a comparative perspective. San Domenico di Fiesole,, Italy: European University Institute.
Edet, A. P. (2015). Institution And Capacity Building In Policy Implementation: A Case Study Of Poverty Eradication Programmes In Nigeria. Journal of International Diversity, 20-35
Feldstein, M. S. (1975). Wealth neutrality and local choice in public education.The American Economic Review, 65(1), 75-89.
Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (1997). Gender differences in educational achievement in a New Zealand birth cohort. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 32, 83-96.
Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a'post- socialist'age. New left review, (212), 68.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. In Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (pp.69-96). Springer Netherlands.
Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Learning Environment and Student Outcomes in Primary Mathematics Classrooms in Singapore.
Hernández, M. (2014). The Relationship between Mathematics Achievement and Socio- Economics Status. Journal of Education, Policy Planning and administration, 4(1), 75-93
Inprasitha, M. (2004). Teaching by open-approach method in Japanese Mathematics Classroom. KKU Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1-17.
Khan, F., Fauzee, M. S. B. O., & Daud, Y. (2015). Significance of Teachers and Education in Promoting National Economic Development: A Case Study of Pakistan. Asian Social Science, 11(12), 290.
Khonkarn, R. (2006). Using Open-Ended Problem-Solving Activities to Develop Implement Curriculum with Emphasizing on Mathematical Thinking Process.
Kilpatrick, J. (2014). History of research in mathematics education. InEncyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 267-272). Springer Netherlands
Klees, S. J., Samoff, J., & Stromquist, N. P. (Eds.). (2012). The World Bank and education: Critiques and alternatives (Vol. 14). Springer Science & Business Media.
Krishnaratne, S., White, H., & Carpenter, E. (2013). Quality education for all children? What works in
education in developing countries. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation
(3ie), Working Paper, (20).
Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. University of Chicago Press.
Minister of Thai Education. (2001). Towards a learning Society in Thailand: An Introduction to Education in Thailand.
Minister of Thai Education. (2008). Towards a learning Society in Thailand: An Introduction to Education in Thailand.
Nasir, Z. M., & Nazli, H. (2010). Education and earnings in Pakistan. Working Papers & Research Reports, RR-No.177.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). National Council of Teachers of mathematics.
Olasehinde, K. J., & Olatoye, R. A. (2014). Scientific attitude, attitude to science and science achievement of senior secondary school students in Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 445.
Oldekop, J. A., Fontana, L. B., Grugel, J., Roughton, N., Adu?Ampong, E. A., Bird, G. K., ... & Agbarakwe, E. (2016). 100 key research questions for the post?2015 development agenda. Development Policy Review, 34(1), 55-82.
Ozturk, M. A., & Singh, K. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status and previous mathematics achievement on high school advanced mathematics course taking. The Mathematics Educator, 16(2), 25-34.
Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership (No. w6665). National bureau of economic research.
Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Gordeeva, T., Grasshof, M., & Oettingen, G. (2000). Gender effects in children's beliefs about school performance: a cross?cultural study. Child Development, 71(2), 517-527.
Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 14(4), 401-429.
Tangkitvanich, S. (2013). Education system ills setting up future failure. TDRI Insight.
Tucker, C. R. (2013). The basics of blended instruction. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 57-60. UNESCO (2014). Education Systems in ASEAN+6 Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Selected Educational Issues Published in 2014 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and UNESCO Bangkok Office.
Zepke, N. (2015). Purposes, pedagogies and practices in lifewide adult education in New Zealand: A preview. International Review of Education, 61(1), 99-113.

In-Text Citation: (Khun-Inkeeree et al., 2016)
To Cite this Article: Khun-Inkeeree, H., Omar-Fauzee, M. S., & Othman, M. K. H. (2016). The Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students’ in Southern Thailand. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 5(3), 42–52.