Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Rasch Analysis and Differential Item Functioning of STEM Teachers’ Instructional Preparedness Instrument for Urban and Rural Teachers

Nur Farhana Ramli, Othman Talib, Siti Aishah Hassan, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/4848

Open access

STEM Teachers’ Instructional Preparedness instrument (STEMTIP) was developed in this study with of 40 items and consists of 5 main constructs. Using multistage cluster sampling, 252 teachers in Malaysia was selected as sample of the study. Rasch Model analyses the psychometric properties of the STEMTIP instrument. The results indicate that 40 items of the STEMTIP are well fitted to a latent unidimensional structure, as required by the Rasch Model. There are two items (ELA1 and EVA8) that show a psychometric properties of Differential Item Functioning in STEMTIP concerning school location. Finally, psychometric implications derived from the results of the present study are discussed and suggestions are provided for future investigations.

Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2015). Science Outlook 2015: Action Towards Vision. (Academy of Sciences Malaysia, Ed.). Ministry of Sciene, Technology And Innovation.
Nordin, A. & Ling, L. H. (2011). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Sains Dengan Penguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Journal of Science & Mathematics Educational, 2(June), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding?: Definition , current debates and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bisho (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (4th ed., pp. 505–518). New York: Springer.
Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education?: strategies and efficacy evidence. Utah: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model?: fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed., Vol. 1). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT013&4_10
Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: a signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 29(1–2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658733
Curriculum Development Division. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.
Dani, D. E., Hartman, S. L., & Helfrich, S. R. (2017). Learning to Teach Science: Elementary Teacher Candidates Facilitate Informal STEM Events. The New Educator, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2017.1356413
Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM Occupations?: Past , Present , And Future.
Hazura Mohamed, Hairulliza Mohamad Judi, Siti Fadzilah M. Noor, & Zawiyah M. Yusiof. (2012). Jurang digital dan pendidikan di luar bandar?: Tahap literasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 1(2), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.ftsm.ukm.my/apjitm
Henry, G. T., Thompson, C. L., Bastian, K. C., Kershaw, D. C., Purtell, K. M., & Zulli, R. A. (2011). Does Teacher Preparation Affect Student Achievement? Education Finance and Policy. Retrieved from http://0-search.ebscohost.com.library.uark.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=27639277&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press. https://doi.org/ISBN 0-941938-03-4
Ministry of Education. (2017). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025?: 2016 Annual Report.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025?: Preschool to post-secondary education. Ministry of Education Malaysia. Putrajaya. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Price, J. (2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.009
Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology Integration in a Science Classroom: Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9507-7
Slavit, D., Nelson, T. H., & Lesseig, K. (2016). The Teachers’ Role in Developing, Opening, and Nurturing an Inclusive STEM-focused School. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0040-5
Van Tuijl, C., & Van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1

In-Text Citation: (Ramli, Talib, Hassan, & Manaf, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Ramli, N. F., Talib, O., Hassan, S. A., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Rasch Analysis and Differential Item Functioning of STEM Teachers’ Instructional Preparedness Instrument for Urban and Rural Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(4), 211–222.