ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Views about the place of young people in schools and society have changed over the past few years. A major theme in the theoretical framework of constructivist learning is that learning is an active process in which learners connect new knowledge and skills to existing ones and, thus, construct new ideas or concepts based upon their current and past knowledge. In this review, we argue that students’ involvement provides opportunities for them to become active participants in their education, including making decisions about what and how they learn and how their learning is assessed. Student voice is located within a complex web of school structures and cultures that are shaped by policymakers, school leaders, teachers, researchers and students themselves. Listening and learning from student voices necessitate a shift from the ways in which teachers are engaged with students and how they perceive their own practices. Using Constructivism reasoning, we theorize that through learning, students acquire specific knowledge, which empowers them to have capacity to participate in curriculum decisions. In relation to this framework, we argue that by the time the learner has acquired knowledge and skills from learning, he should be able to share that accumulation of knowledge and skills to the curriculum development process. Further, we look at curriculum change and suggest that it refers to educational change that conveys the image of starting anew, of changing not only content but also form, of shifting from thinking with the old order to inventing a new order that is found on new assumptions, values and vision. Students’ input is important in its own right, but allowing them to participate in curriculum change empowers them and encourages them to take responsibility for matters that concern them. We conceptualize that the presence of student’s voice should be felt in all manner of school development.
Aker, J., Kuiper, W., and Wand, H. (2003). Curriculum Landscapes and Trends. Dordecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aoki, T. T. (1986). Interests, knowledge and evaluation: Alternative approaches to curriculum evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 6, (4), 27-44.
Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Pren-tice Hall.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1974). ‘The growth of representational processes in childhood’, In Beyond the
Information Given, London: George Allen and Unwin.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Mitra, D.
(2004), The Significance of Students: Can Increasing ‘Student Voice’ in Schools Lead to Gains in Youth Development, Teachers College Record, Volume 106, Number 4.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing Students' Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and
Change in Education. Educational Researcher 31, 4, 3-14.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, Presence, and Power: "Student Voice" in Educational Research and Reform. Curriculum Inquiry 36, 4, 359-390.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K. C. & Keller, J. M (2005). Principles of Instructional
Design (5th edition). California: Wadsworth.
Glatthorn, A. A., Foyd, B., and Whitehead, B. M. (2009). Curriculum Leadership: Strategies
for Development and Implementation (second edition). Los Angeles. SAGE.
Fielding, M. (2007). Beyond "Voice": New Roles, Relations, and Contexts in Researching with
Young People. Discourse 28, 3, 301-310.
Fielding, M., and Prieto, M. (2002). The Central Place of Student Voice in Democratic Renewal: A Chilean Case Study, in M. Schweisfurth, L. Davies and C. Harber (eds) Learning Democracy and Citizenship: International Experiences. Oxford: Symposium Books. Pp. 19-36.
Fletcher, A. (2005). Meaningful Student Involvement: Guide to Students as Partners in School
Change, created for SoundOut.org in partnership with HumanLinks Foundation.
Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher Development and Pupil Voice. Curriculum Journal 18, 3, 343-354.
Flutter, J., and Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting Pupils: What's in It for Schools? London:
RoutledgeFalmer
Frost, R. (2007). Developing the Skills of Seven- and Eight-Year-Old Researchers: A Whole
Class Approach. Educational Action Research 15, 3, 441-458.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed). New York: Teachers
College Press.
Glasersfeld, E. Von. (1982). ‘An Interpretation of Piaget’s Constructivism’. Revue
Internationale de Philosophie, 36, 612–635.
Glasersfeld, E. Von. (1991). Distinguishing the observer: An attempt at interpreting Maturana. Methodologia 8: 57–68.
Grace, G. (1995). School Leadership. London: Falmer Press.
Hansen, K. T. (2010). Curriculum Planning: Integrating Multicultural Constructivism and
EducationReforms (4th ed). Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
Hanushek, E., and Welch, F. (2006). Handbook of the Economies of Education. Vol. 2.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Holdsworth, R. (2000). Schools that Create Real Roles of Value for Young People. Prospects 30, 3, 349-362.
Jackson, D. (2005). Why Pupil Voice? Facilitating Pupil Involvement in Learning Networks,
NCSL.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical
paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (3), 5-14.
Köhler, W. (1924) Die Physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im Stationären Zustand: Eine
naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophischen Akadamie.
MacBeath, J., Demetriou, H., Rudduck, J., and Myers, K. (2003). Consulting Pupils: A Toolkit
for Teachers. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing.
McNeil, J. D. (2009). Contemporary Curriculum: In Thought and Action. USA: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
International Perspective (electronic edition). London: Routledge.
Malewski, E. (2010) (editor). Curriculum Studies Handbook. The Next Moment. New York:
Routledge.
Marra, R., & Jonassen, D. (1993). Whither constructivism. In D. Ely & B. Minor (Eds.),
Educational media and technology yearbook (pp. 56.77). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. [Published in cooperation with ERIC and AECT.]
Ministry of Youth Affairs. (2003) Youth Development: Youth Participation Case Studies.
Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Youth Affairs. Available from http://www.myd.govt.nz/about-myd/publications/youth-participation-case-studies.html [accessed 3 June 2010].
Mitra, D. (2001) Opening the Floodgates: Giving Students a Voice in School Reform. Forum 43, 2, 91-94.
Mitra, D. (2003), Student Voice In School Reform: Reframing Student-Teacher Relationships,
McGill Journal of Education, 38(2).
Mitra, D. (2004). The Significance of Students: Can Increasing ‘Student Voice’ in Schools Lead
to Gains in Youth Development, Teachers College Record, Volume 106, Number 4.
Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building
partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership , 37 (4), 522-543. doi:10.1177/1741143209334577
Morgan, B. (2006) Consulting Pupils about Teaching and Learning: Policy, Process and
Response in One School. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Moyles, J., and Hargreaves, L. (2003) (editors). The Primary Curriculum: Learning from
International Perspective (electronic edition). London: Routledge.
Olibie, E. (2013). Emergent Global Curriculum Trends: Implications for Teachers as
Facilitators of Curriculum Change. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.4, No.5, 2013
Ornstein, A. G., & Hunkins, F. P. (2009). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues.
Boston: Pearson.
Paris, S. G., & Byrne, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Shunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pedder, D., and McIntyre, D. (2006) Pupil Consultation: The Importance of Social Capital.
Educational Review 58, 2, 145-157.
Perkins, D. N. (1991b). What constructivism demands of the learner. Educational Technology, 31 (9), 19-21.
Piaget, J. (1971). Insights and illusions of philosophy. Meridian: New York.
Rorty, R. (1991). Philosophical Papers Volume 1: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ranson, S. (2000). Recognizing the Pedagogy of Voice in a Learning Community, Educational
Management and Administration, 28 (3).
Rudduck, J. (2007) Student Voice, Student Engagement, and School Reform, in D. Thiessen and A. Cook-Sather (eds) International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School. Dordrecht: Springer. Pp. 587-610.
Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., and Wallace, G. (1996) School Improvement: What Can Pupils Tell
Us? (Quality in Secondary Schools and Colleges Series). London: David Fulton Press.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000), Pupil Participation and Perspective: ‘Carving a New Order of
Experience’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1).
Rudduck, J., and McIntyre, D. (2007) Improving Learning Through Consulting Pupils
(Improving Learning TLRP Series). London: Routledge.
Shiundu, S., and Omulando. (1992). Curriculum: Theory and Practice in Kenya. Nairobi: Oxford
University Press.
Taylor, H., & Hogenbirk, P. (2001). Information and Communication Technologies in Education/. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wilen-Daugenti, T., and McKee, A. G. (2008). 21st Century Trends for Higher Education: Top
Trends, 2008-2009. Higher Education Practice- Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group.
Tyler, R. W. (1975). Specific approaches to curriculum development. In J. Schaffarzick, & D.
Hampson, Strategies for Curriculum Development (p. 256). Berkeley CA: McCutchan.
Thompson, P. (2009). Consulting secondary school pupils about their learning. Oxford Review of Education, 35 (6), 671-687. Doi: 10.1080/03054980903357319
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In Husen, T. & Postlewaite, N. (Eds.),
International Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 162-163.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and Society.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
West, L. (2004). The Learner’s Voice. Making Space? Challenging Space? From the Keynote
Address, 2004, Canterbury Action Research Network (CANTARNET) Conference, reported in The Enquirer, Spring 2005
In-Text Citation: (Ngussa & Makewa, 2014)
To Cite this Article: Ngussa, B. M., & Makewa, L. N. (2014). Student Voice in Curriculum Change: A Theoretical Reasoning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(3), 21–32.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode