ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This study aims to test the effect of participatory budgeting and procedural fairness on the manager's commitment and performance either have simultaneous or partial effect. The method of the research used was a survey method that conducted at the pawnshop in North Sumatra with the respondents of the managers in branch offices. The data used is primary data by collecting data through questionnaires. The analysis method used is descriptive-analytical verification. The effect model analyzed by using a structural equation model to analyze the pattern of causal relationships between variables and determine the direct, indirect and total effect of some variables. The results showed that participatory budgeting and procedural fairness simultaneously have a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; participatory budgeting has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; procedural fairness has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; participatory budgeting, procedural fairness and manager’s commitment simultaneously has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the effect of participatory budgeting has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the procedural fairness has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the manager’s commitment has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance.
Anthony, N. R., & Vijay, G. (2003). Management Control System. Irwin-McGraw-Hill.
Binberg, J., Shields, M., & Mc Innes. (1986). Budgetary Participation, Motivation and Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review, 9(4), 587-600.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural Justice and Worker Motivation, In Motivation and Work Behavior. Edited by R.M. Staw, & L.W. Porter. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Chong, Vincent, K., & Ming, C. K. (2002). Budget Goal Commitment and Informational Effects of Budget Participation on Performance: Astructural Equation Modeling Approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14
Folger, R. D., Rosenfeld & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative Deprivation and Procedural Justification. Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
Ferdinand, A. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Aplikasi Model-model Rumit Dalam Penelitian Untuk Tesis S-2 & Disertasi S-3 (Application of Research Models). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of Participation in Budgetary Process on. Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decisions Sciences, 196 516.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Psychometric Method. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.
Hollebeck, J. R., Charles, R., Williams, & Howard, J. K. (1989). An Empirical Examination of The Antercedents of Commitment to Difficult Goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18-23.
Hansen, D. R., & Maryanne, M. M. (2005). Management Accounting, 7th USA, International, Thomson Publishing.
Kennis, I. (1979). Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitudes and Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol 14 (4) pp 707-721.
Kreitner, R., & Angelo, K. (2000). Organizational Behavior. Mc Graw-Hill Companies, New York.
Libby, T. (1999). The Influence of Voice and Explanation on Performance in A Participative Budgeting Setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 125-137.
Lindquist, T. M. (1995). Fairness as Antecedent to Participative Budgeting: Examining The Effects of Distrutive Justice, Procedural Justice and Referent Cognition on Satisfaction and Performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 122-142.
Maryanto. (2004). Perum Pegadaian: Selayang Pandang Sejarah Pegadaian.
Milani, K. (1975). The Relationship of Participation in Budget Setting to Industrial Supervisor Performance and Attitude: A Field Study. The Accounting Review.
Murray, D. (1990). The Performance Effect of Participative Budgeting: An Integration of Intervening and Moderating Variables. Behavioral Reseach in Accounting, 104-123.
Mulyasari, W., & Sugiri, S. (2005). Keadilan, Komitmen Pada Tujuan, dan Job Relevant Information dalam Penganggaran Partisipatif. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(3), 310-324.
Otley, D. (1978). Budget Use and Managerial Performance. Journal Accounting Research, 16, 122-149.
Shields, J. F., & Shields. (1998). Antecendents of Participative Budgeting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 49-76.
Shields, M. D., & Young. (1993). Antecedents and Consequences of Participative Budgeting: Evidence on the Effects of Asymmetrical Information. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 265-280.
Shields, M. D., Deng, Johny, F., & Kato, Y. (2000). The Design and Effects of Control Systems: Test of Direct-and Indirect-Effects Models. Accounting Organizations and Society, 25, 185-202.
Siegel, G., & Helena Ramanauskas-Marconi (1989). Behavioral Accounting. Cincinatti: South Western Publications Company.
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survay. Edisi Revisi, LP3ES, Jakarta.
Widia, A. (2012). Pengaruh Lingkungan Bisnis terhadap Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen, dan Penganggaran dampaknya terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Trikonomika, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pasundan, Terakreditasi Dikti Nomor 110/DIKTI/Kep/ 2009, 11, 160-175
Wentzel, K. (2002). The Influence of Fairness Perceptions and Goal Commitment on Managers Performance in A Budget Setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, 247-271.
Yusfaningrum, K., & Ghozali, I. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Melalui Komitmen Tujuan Anggaran dan Job Relevant Information Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Kumpulan Materi Simposiun Nasional Akuntansi, Solo, 15-16 September 2005, 656-666.
In-Text Citation: (Astuty, 2014)
To Cite this Article: Astuty, W. (2014). An Analysis on the Impact of Participatory Budgeting and Procedural Fairness Toward Manager’s Commitment and Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 4(4), 244–261.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode