ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of occupational fraud related to government procurement. The examinations include assessments on whether ethical values, knowledge of fraud behaviour and abuse of power have a significant relationship with government procurement. This study employed quantitative method approach based on primary data, by using simple random sampling technique via survey questionnaire distributed to public servants that involved in government procurement activities. The result revealed significant relationship between ethical values and occupational fraud while knowledge of fraud behaviour and abuse of power resulted insignificant relationship with occupational fraud in government procurement.
This study has limitation subject to responses received from respondents, who may or might not be honestly expressing their opinion, as well as the fact that it is restricted to the questionnaire provided. It also focused solely on perception from public servant that involve in the government procurement. The finding of this study can be used to further stimulate the research of occupational fraud within public sector with the aim of promoting cooperation between public and private sector while improving the effectiveness of government services.
Abul Hassan, S. H., Ismail, S., & Ahmad @ Abdul Mutalib, H. (2020). Public procurement in Malaysia: objectives and procurement principles. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-03-2020-0033
ACFE. (2020). Report to the Nations 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. https://acfepublic.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2020-Report-to-the-Nations.pdf
Khair, A. H., Haniffa, R., Hudaib, M., & Mohamad, M. N. (2015). Personalisation of power, neoliberalism, and the production of corruption. Accounting Forum, 39(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.001
Amoh, J. K., Awunyo-Vitor, D., & Ofori-Boateng, K. (2020). Customers’ awareness and knowledge level of fraudulent acts in electronic banking in Ghana: evidence from a universal bank. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2020-0161
Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2020). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (M. McDonald, Ed.; 8th Edition). Wiley.
Chamhuri, S. (2012). Transformation of government procurement in Malaysia: Directions and initiatives “Assessment of Pond Productivity for Carp Fish Species in Rajshahi”. RU Project ID-853-5/52/BiMaKha/Agri-30/ 2015) 2015-View project Khairul Naim Adham Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301060782
Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2013). Executive integrity, audit opinion, and fraud in Chinese listed firms. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.12.003
Fincham, J. E. (2008). VIEWPOINTS Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html
Guile, P. (2013). 10 Ways to control procurement fraud. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS). https://www.cips.org/supply-management/opinion/2013/december/10-ways-to-control-procurement-fraud/
Hasan, M. N. (2016). The Determinants of Public Procurement Corruption in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 34(12), 1865–1868.
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2016.1865.1868
Johari, R. J., Alam, M. M., & Said, J. (2021). Investigating factors that influence Malaysian auditors’ ethical sensitivity. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2021-0006
Popoola, J. O. M., Ahmad, A. C., & Samsudin, R. S. (2014). Fraud and Forensic Accounting: Knowledge and Risk Assessment Task Performance in Malaysian Public Sector – Conceptual study. 113–119. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-1997_af14.55
Mathenge, G. D. (2014). An Empirical study to Measuring Corruption and Integrity in Kenyan Police Agency: An Ethical Perspective (Vol. 4, Issue 2). www.iiste.org
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Muhamad, N., & Gani, A. N. (2020). A decade of corruption studies in Malaysia. In Journal of Financial Crime (Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 423–436). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2019-0099
Hasan, N. M. (2016). The Determinants of Public Procurement Corruption in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 34(12), 1865–1868.
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2016.1865.1868
Omar, M., Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2016). The causes, impact and prevention of employee fraud: A case study of an automotive company. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2015-0020
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)). (2016). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/Corruption-Public-Procurement-Brochure.pdf
Othman, Z., Shafie, R., & Hamid, F. Z. A. (2014). Corruption – Why do they do it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.074
Perbendaharaan Malaysia. (n.d.-a). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan PK 1.1. Retrieved May 31, 2022, from https://ppp.treasury.gov.my
Perbendaharaan Malaysia. (n.d.-b). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan PK 2.1. Retrieved May 31, 2022, from https://ppp.treasury.gov.my
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating religiosity into fraud triangle theory: findings on Malaysian police officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027
Said, J., Omar, N., Rafidi, M., & Yusof, S. N. (2018). Are organizational factors more prevailing than individual factors in mitigating employee fraud?: Findings from Royal Custom Officers. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2017-0087
Saidah, K., Azmi, A., Lope, A. A., & Rahman, A. (2015). E-Procurement: A tool to mitigate public procurement fraud in Malaysia? https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/623
Hameed, S. N. M. (2021). Usah lagi pertikai bilangan penjawat awam. Berita Harian Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/rencana/komentar/2021/01/771880/usah-lagi-pertikai-bilangan-penjawat-awam
Stadler, W. A., & Benson, M. L. (2012). Revisiting the Guilty Mind: The Neutralization of White-Collar Crime. Criminal Justice Review, 37(4), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016812465618
Zahari, A. I., & Arshad, R. (2020). Fraud Development and Linkages with Corruption Occurrences. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 2(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.2.2.2019.5469
Sadique, R. B. M., Ismail, A. M., Roudaki, J., Alias, N., & Clark, M. B. (2019). Corporate governance attributes in fraud deterrence. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n3p51
Said, J., Omar, N., Rafidi, M., & Yusof, S. N. (2018). Are organizational factors more prevailing than individual factors in mitigating employee fraud?: Findings from Royal Custom Officers. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2017-0087
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, Dec 2004; 74, 12; ABI/INFORM Complete pg. 38
Zahari, A. I., Said, J., & Muhamad, N. (2021). Public sector fraud: the Malaysian perspective. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2021-0013
In-Text Citation: (Basir et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Basir, M. A., Yusoff, H., & Kamal, M. E. M. (2022). Determinants of Occupational Fraud in Government Procurement: Malaysia’s Public Sector Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12), 389 – 406.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non0-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode