ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Bank Negara Malaysia (2014) mentioned the importance of having meaningful disclosure to protect participants. However, it did not provide details of the elements of meaningful disclosure. There is no specific guidelines or standards of what should be reported and how detailed the items should be reported. Takaful operators have more knowledge in the operational aspect of takaful, compared to the participants. Authorities try to harmonise all the possible variations and gaps between takaful operators (preparers) and participants (users) for the benefit of the industry. Any gap between what is expected to be reported (desirable) and what is actually reported needs to be analysed in order to provide more information relevant to the users and to standardise the disclosure level. By adopting Sulaiman’s (2005) framework, the study determines what users and preparers perceive as meaningful disclosure on the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) standards. The first two objectives of the study are to determine the disclosure perspectives of the two parties while the third objective is to examine if gaps exist between the two stakeholders. Questionnaire was distributed to takaful agents to examine their perception while content analysis was employed to evaluate the actual level of disclosure in takaful operators' websites. The gap analysis was conducted between the desired and actual level of disclosure and found significant differences among all the gaps. Additionally, the average level of disclosure is 44%. It is hoped that the findings will assist authorities in formulating guideline in takaful industry in Malaysia.
Ab Rahman, A., Ali, N. A., Che Seman, A., & Wan Ahmad, W. M. (2008). Comparative Study Between Auto Takaful and Auto Insurance Purchasing Behaviour Among Malaysian Undergraduates. Shariah Journal, 16(1), 75–88.
Abdul Aris, N., Tapsir, R., & Abu Talib, M. K. (2012). Risk and Risk Management in Takaful Industry. Journal of Global Business and Economics, 4(1), 29–39.
Abdul Wahab, A. R., Lewis, M. K., & Hassan, M. K. (2007). Islamic Takaful?: Business Models , Shariah Concerns , and Proposed Solutions. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(June), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie
Akhter, W. (2010). Risk Management in Takaful. Enterprise Risk Management, 1(1), 128–145.
Akhter, W., & Hussain, T. (2012). Takaful standards and customer perceptions affecting takaful practices in Pakistan: a survey. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(3), 229–240.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391211255214
Akhter, W., Jamil, H., & Fam, K. S. (2021). Islamic influence on customer satisfaction: evidence from Takaful and conventional insurance industry. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(4), 524–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0148
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1
Altuntas, M., Berry-stölzle, T. R., & Erlbeck, A. (2011). Takaful — Charity or Business?? Journal of Insurance Regulation, 339–358.
Amuda, Y. J., & Hassan, S. (2019). Diversification of motor takaful surplus for socio-economic development of less privileged inhabitants in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(6), 1–12.
Archer, S., Abdel Karim, R. A., & Nienhaus, V. (2009). Conceptual, Legal and Institutional Issues Confronting Takaful. In S. Archer, R. Ahmed Abdel Karim, & V. Nienhaus (Eds.), Takaful Islamic Insurance: Concepts and Regulatory Issues. Clementi Loop, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd.
Arofah, S. U., Puspitasari, N., & Farida, L. (2019). Determinants of Tabarru’Fund Proportion In Family Takaful in Indonesia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 13(1), 21–40.
Ayinde, L. O., & Echchabi, A. (2012). Perception and Adoption of Islamic Insurance in Malaysia?: An Empirical Study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 20(3), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.20.03.1954
Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1150–1170. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732609
Bashir, M. S., & Mail, N. H. (2011). Consumer Perceptions of Islamic Insurance Companies in Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(3), 285–306.
Bebbington, J., Gray, R., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Financial Accounting: Practice and Principles. London: International Thomson Business Press.
Bekkin, R. I. (2007). Islamic Insurance?: National Features and Legal Regulation. Arab Law Quarterly, 21, 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1163/026805507X214415
Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323–348.
Bruns, W. J. J. (1968). Accounting Information and Decision Making: Some Behavioral Hypotheses’. The Accounting Review, 469–480.
De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. J. (2010). Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. British Accounting Review, 42(4), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.08.002
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does Isomorphism Legitimate? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(No 4), 1024–1039.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
El-Halaby, S., Hussainey, K., Mohamed, M., & Hussien, M. (2018). The determinants of financial, social and Sharia disclosure accountability for Islamic banks. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 8(3), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv8i3p2
Hamid, M. A., Osman, J., Ariffin, B., & Nordin, A. (2009). Determinants of Corporate Demand for Islamic Insurance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 3(2), 278–296.
Hassan, A., & Kouhy, R. (2014). Time-series cross-sectional environmental performance and disclosure relationship?: specific evidence from a less-developed country. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 2(2), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v2i2.2748
Hassan, E., & Rohayem, A. (2011). Transparency and Financial Reporting in Islamic Insurance. In Takaful Islamic Insurance: Concept and Regulatory Issues (pp. 265–284).
Hassan, R., Salman, S. A., Kassim, S., & Abdul Rashid, H. M. (2018). Awareness and Knowledge of Takaful in Malaysia?: A Survey of Malaysian Consumers. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n11p6
IFSB. Guiding Principles On Governance For Takaful (Islamic Insurance) Undertakings. (2009).
IFSB, & IAIS. (2006). Issues in Regulation and Supervision of Takaful (Islamic Insurance).
Nyahas, I. S., Munene, J. C., Orobia, L., & Kaawaase, K. T. (2017). Isomorphic influences and voluntary disclosure: The mediating role of organizational culture. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1351144
Ishak, N. H. I., & Saraih, U. N. (2021). Word of mouth, trust and customer satisfaction in family takaful industry in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2339(May). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044185
Ismail, N., Alhabshi, S. O., & Bacha, O. (2011). Organizational Form and Efficiency: The Coexistence of Family Takaful and Life Insurance in Malaysia. Journal of Global Business and Economics, 3(1), 122–137.
Kamal, A. R. (2012). The Relationship Between Corporate Governance And Environmental Disclosure: UK Evidence. Durham University.
Kamala, P. N. (2014). The Decision-Usefulness of Corporate Environmental Reports in South Africa. University of South Africa.
Laughlin, R., & Gray, R. (1988). Financial accounting: Method and meaning. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Maliah, S. (2005). Islamic Corporate Reporting: Between the Desireable and the Desired. IIUM Research Centre.
Matsawali, M. S., Abdullah, M. F., Ping, Y. C., Abidin, S. Y., Zaini, M. M., Ali, H. M., … Yaacob, H. (2012). A Study on Takaful and Conventional Insurance Preferences?: The Case of Brunei. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(22), 163–177.
Maysami, R. C., & Kwon, W. J. (1999). An analysis of islamic takaful insurance?: A cooperative insurance mechanism. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 18(1), 109–132.
Maysami, R. C., & Williams, J. J. (2006). Evidence on the relationship between Takaful insurance and fundamental perception of Islamic principles. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 2(4), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540500461778
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(No 2), 340–363.
Muhamat@Kawangit, R., Don, A. G., Hamjah, S. H., Md. Sham, F., Mohd. Nasir, B., Asha’ari, M. F., … Abd Ghani, M. Z. (2012). The Management of Takaful Business Models in Malaysia. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 561–564.
Nani, D. A. (2019). Islamic Social Reporting: the Difference of Perception Between User and Preparer of Islamic Banking in Indonesia. TECHNOBIZ?: International Journal of Business, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.33365/tb.v2i1.280
Qu, W., Cooper, B. J., Wise, V., & Leung, P. (2012). Voluntary Disclosure in a Changing Regulatory Environment–Evidence from Chinese Stock Market. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n4p30
Rahman, N. A., Osman, Z. A., Ani, N. S., & Ahmad, Z. (2019). Religious and socioeconomic implications of Islamic insurance: A review. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p313
Redzuan, H., Abdul Rahman, Z., & Aidid, S. S. S. H. (2009). Economic Determinants of Family Takaful Consumption?: Evidence From Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(5), 193–211.
Salleh, M. C. M., Abdullah, N. I., & Razali, S. S. (2013). Measuring Takaful Agents’ Understanding Towards the Objectives and Concepts of Takaful. Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.12816/0001114
Salman, S. A. (2014). Contemporary issues in takaful (islamic insurance). Asian Social Science, 10(22), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n22p210
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations (6th, illustr ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.
Sherif, M., & Shaairi, N. A. (2013). Determinants of demand on family Takaful in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 4(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590811311314276
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Sulaiman, M. (2005). Islamic Corporate Reporting: Between the Desirable and the Desired. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Research Centre, IIUM.
Ismail, W. Z., Yusof, M. F., & Ahmad, I. (2021). Capital Management for Takaful Business: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Advanced …, (June). https://doi.org/10.37934/arbms.22.1.819
Wingard, H. C. (2001). Financial Performance of Environmentally Responsible South African Listed Companies. University of Pretoria.
Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(82)90025-3
Wolk, H. I., Tearney, M. G., & Dodd, J. L. (2001). Accounting Theory: A conceptual and institutional approach. (5th editio). Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College.
Yakob, R. B. A. M. H.-S., & Hisham, B. N. H. (2019). Demographic analysis towards the understanding of Education Takaful (Islamic Insurance) Plan. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 15(4), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2019-1504-07
In-Text Citation: (Alias et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Alias, A. Z., Sulaiman, M., Ariffin, N. M., & Bakar, I. S. A. (2023). Takaful Reporting on IFSB Requirements in Malaysia: Users and Preparers Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 13(2), 152–170.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode