Organizational Behavior (OB) represents an essential pillar in the realm of management studies, having dynamically evolved to encompass a wide array of methodologies and interdisciplinary approaches. This study endeavors to provide an extensive bibliometric review, aimed at delivering quantitative insights into the historical progression, influential contributors, and the diverse thematic clusters that define OB. Our analysis, which carefully examines 308 articles and review papers published in English and indexed in the Scopus database from 2013 to 2023, utilizes a mixed-methods bibliometric approach. By employing tools such as RStudio's Bibliometrix package, VOSviewer, and Excel, we meticulously map out the intellectual structure and evolving trends within OB literature, incorporating both citation and co-occurrence methodologies. The comprehensive analysis conducted reveals key figures and leading journals in the field, such as the Journal of Business Ethics and the Journal of OB and Management, shedding light on those who have significantly contributed to OB. Notably, our study identifies eleven pivotal thematic clusters that form the backbone of current OB research: Integration of Technology and Human Dynamics; Ethical and Moral Considerations; Responsibility and Commitment in Organizations; Employee Engagement and Performance; Organizational Culture and Sustainability; Ethical Leadership and Organizational Identification; Leadership and Cultural Impact on Unethical Behavior; Employee-Organization Relationships; Workplace Learning and Development; Innovation and Change Management; and Globalization and Cross-Cultural Dynamics. Each of these clusters highlights unique facets and emerging trends within OB, ranging from the integration of advanced technologies and ethical leadership to the impact of globalization on organizational practices. This bibliometric review is pioneering in its approach to analyzing OB literature, offering a comprehensive, multidimensional perspective. The themes identified, along with the potential avenues for future research, provide a solid foundation for scholars and practitioners. This groundwork aims to deepen the collective understanding of OB, enhancing our comprehension of its complexities and intricacies.
Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343-351.Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343-351.
Al Zeer, I., Ajouz, M., & Salahat, M. (2023). Conceptual model of predicting employee performance through the mediating role of employee engagement and empowerment. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(5), 986-1004.
Altarturi, B. H. M., & Ajouz, M. A. K. (2021). Review of knowledge framework and conceptual structure of Islamic Banking. Al Qasimia University Journal of Islamic Economics, 1(2), 116-143.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Bulgurcuoglu, A. N. (2020). Determination of the psychological resilience levels of handball coaches according to various variables. PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 22.
Hosseini, H. (2003). The arrival of behavioral economics: from Michigan, or the Carnegie School in the 1950s and the early 1960s? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(4), 391-409.
Kanan, M., Dababat, H., Saleh, Y., Zaid, A., Assaf, R., Zahran, S., Salahat, M. A., & Al-Sartawi, A. (2023). Impact Of Total Quality Management Practices on The Transformation to Entrepreneurial Universities in Palestine: The Moderating Role of Innovation. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 6(3).
Kennedy, J. W., Heinzman, J., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2007). The early organizational management theories: The human relations movement & business ethical practices pioneered by visionary leader Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3).
Lawrence, P. R. (1983). Historical development of organizational behavior. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of management, 33(3), 321-349.
Martín-del-Río, B., Neipp, M.-C., García-Selva, A., & Solanes-Puchol, A. (2021). Positive organizational psychology: a bibliometric review and science mapping analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(10), 5222.
Masood, R., Lim, J. B., González, V. A., Roy, K., & Khan, K. I. A. (2022). A systematic review on supply chain management in prefabricated house-building research. Buildings, 12(1), 40.
Putra, R., & Ali, H. (2022). Organizational behavior determination and decision making: analysis of skills, motivation and communication (literature review of human resource management). Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 3(3), 420-431.
Rivai, A., Suharto, D., & Ali, H. (2017). Organizational performance analysis: Loyalty predictors are mediated by work motivation at urban village in Bekasi City. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(3/4), 441-452.
Salahat, M. A., & Ta’amreh, R. (2023). The Connective Power of Entrepreneurial Bricolage in NGOs: Unveiling its Mediating Influence on Social Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainability. Journal of Knowledge Management Application and Practice, 5(1), 15-26.
Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937). na.
Utaminingsih, A. (2014). Organizational Behavior: Theoretical & Empirical Study of Organizational Culture, Leadership Style, Trust and Commitment. In: UB Press.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), 409-421.
(Zeer & Salahat, 2024)
Zeer, I. Al, & Salahat, M. A. (2024). The History and Revolution of Organizational Behavior: A Multidimensional Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 14(1), 309–328.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
