ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This study aims to the direct relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, technological innovativeness, and acceptance with self-efficacy as a mediator among employees in higher education institutions. To collect primary data, a thorough survey was designed and conducted based on previous research. Structural equation modeling, known for its ability to analyze complex interactions between variables, was used to analyze a comprehensive data set of 422 responses, and convergent and discriminant validity was confirmed. Evaluation of the structural model crucially confirmed the hypotheses and revealed nine direct relationships and four mediated relationships. The findings reveal that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and technological innovativeness significantly influence artificial intelligence-enabled transformation acceptance, with attitude serving as a crucial mediator. Notably, perceived ease of use emerges as the most impactful factor, emphasizing the need for user-friendly interfaces and streamlined processes. The study demonstrates the relative importance of each latent variable in shaping acceptance, providing practical implications for HEIs. The results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance technological innovativeness and the cultivation of a positive attitude among employees. Moreover, the research contributes to theoretical frameworks by integrating attitude as a mediator, enriching our understanding of artificial intelligence-enabled transformation acceptance dynamics. Contextually, the study highlights the importance of organizational climate and culture in fostering a conducive environment for technological innovation. Future studies are suggested to adopt longitudinal designs, cross-cultural analyses, and intervention strategies, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of AI-ET acceptance and facilitating successful integration in the ever-evolving landscape of higher education.
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023).
Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 1-33.
Alkindi, M. Z. H., Hafiz, A. D., Abulibdeh, E., Almurshidi, G., & Abulibdeh, A. (2022). Moderating
Effect of Faculty Status in the Relationship between Attitude, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Behavioral Intention, Subjective Norms on Mobile Learning Applications. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5359-5379.
Ashaari, M. A., Singh, K. S. D., Abbasi, G. A., Amran, A., & Liebana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2021). Big
data analytics capability for improved performance of higher education institutions in the Era of IR 4.0: A multi-analytical SEM & ANN perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121119.
Awdziej, M., Jaciow, M., Lipowski, M., Tkaczyk, J., & Wolny, R. (2023). Students Digital
Maturity and Its Implications for Sustainable Behavior. Sustainability, 15(9), 7269.
Bansah, A. K., & Darko Agyei, D. (2022). Perceived convenience, usefulness, effectiveness and
user acceptance of information technology: evaluating students’ experiences of a Learning Management System. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(4), 431-449.
Bubou, G. M., & Job, G. C. (2022). Individual innovativeness, self-efficacy and e-learning
readiness of students of Yenagoa study centre, National Open University of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(1), 2-22.
Cantú-Ortiz, F. J., Galeano Sánchez, N., Garrido, L., Terashima-Marin, H., & Brena, R. F. (2020).
An artificial intelligence educational strategy for the digital transformation. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 1195-1209.
Chahal, J., & Rani, N. (2022). Exploring the acceptance for e-learning among higher education
students in India: combining technology acceptance model with external variables. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(3), 844-867.
Chik, W. N. A. W., & Arokiasamy, L. (2019). Perceived higher education climate of academics
in Malaysian private institutions in Industry 4.0. Global Business and Management Research, 11(1), 488-504.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-
2909.112.1.155
Dahri, N. A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., Yahaya, N., Vighio, M. S., Al-maatuok, Q., ... &
Al-Adwan, A. S. (2023). Acceptance of Mobile Learning Technology by Teachers: Influencing Mobile Self-Efficacy and 21st-Century Skills-Based Training. Sustainability, 15(11), 8514.
Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of
Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-334. doi:10.2307/249008
De Cannière, M. H., De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M. (2009) Relationship quality and the theory
of planned behaviour models of behavioral intentions and purchase behavior. J. Bus. Res., 62, 82–92.
George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education
through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1): 115-135.
Jaiswal, A., & Arun, C. J. (2021). Potential of Artificial Intelligence for Transformation of the
Education System in India. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(1), 142-158.
Jamaludin, R., McKAY, E., & Ledger, S. (2020). Are we ready for Education 4.0 within ASEAN
higher education institutions? Thriving for knowledge, industry and humanity in a dynamic higher education ecosystem? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1161-1173.
Kampa, R. K. (2023). Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating
the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
Kerži?, D., Tomaževi?, N., Aristovnik, A., & Umek, L. (2019). Exploring critical factors of the
perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students. PloS one, 14(11), e0223767.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach.
International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
Kuleto, V., Ili?, M., Dumangiu, M., Rankovi?, M., Martins, O. M., P?un, D., & Mihoreanu, L.
(2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424.
Nuryakin, N., Rakotoarizaka, N. L. P., & Musa, H. G. (2023). The Effect of Perceived Usefulness
and Perceived Easy to Use on Student Satisfaction The Mediating Role of Attitude to Use Online Learning. APMBA (Asia Pacific Management and Business Application), 11(3), 331-344.
Okunlaya, R. O., Abdullah, S. N., & Alias, R. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) library
services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1869-1892.
Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2023). Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university
students during Covid-19: Integrating the full spectrum of Self-Determination Theory and self-efficacy into the Technology Acceptance Model. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18212-18231.
Regatto-Bonifaz, J., & Viteri-Miranda, V. (2023). Attitude towards Technology and its
relationship with Academic Self-Efficacy in Ecuadorian university students. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 3216-3233.
Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The
importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems 116: 1865–1886.
Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek:
SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
Saidi, S., Basir, A., Juhaidi, A., & Salabi, A. (2022). Mediating Role of Attitude and Impact of
Social Support, Technical Support, And Perceived Ease of Use in Adoption of Technology During COVID-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 100(100), 1-17.
Salloum, S., Al Marzouqi, A., Alderbashi, K. Y., Shwedeh, F., Aburayya, A., Al Saidat, M. R., &
Al-Maroof, R. S. (2023). Sustainability Model for the Continuous Intention to Use Metaverse Technology in Higher Education: A Case Study from Oman. Sustainability, 15(6), 5257.
Sharma, S., & Saini, J. R. (2022). On the role of teachers’ acceptance, continuance intention
and self-efficacy in the use of digital technologies in teaching practices. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(6), 721-736.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., and Ringle, C. M.
(2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict.
European Journal of Marketing 53: 2322–2347.
Tan, P. S. H., Seow, A. N., Choong, Y. O., Tan, C. H., Lam, S. Y., & Choong, C. K. (2023). University
students’ perceived service quality and attitude towards hybrid learning: ease of use and usefulness as mediators. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
Tennakoon, H., Hansen, J. M., Saridakis, G., Samaratunga, M., & Hansen, J. W. (2023). Drivers
and Barriers of Social Sustainable Development and Growth of Online Higher Education: The Roles of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness. Sustainability, 15(10), 8319.
Twum, K. K., Ofori, D., Keney, G., & Korang-Yeboah, B. (2022). Using the UTAUT, personal
innovativeness and perceived financial cost to examine student’s intention to use E-learning. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(3), 713-737.
Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence
capability on students' self-efficacy, creativity, and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4919-4939.
(Osman & Yatam, 2024)
Osman, Z., & Yatam, M. (2024). Enhancing Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Transformation Acceptance among Employees of Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 14(2), 289–304.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode