ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Innovation is not only an important source of enterprise core competitiveness, but also a key element to drive Chinese economic growth and enhance international competitiveness. This study aims to analyze the impact of CEOs’ academic experience on innovation performance, moderated by CEO duality in China. This study takes Chinese A-share listed firms in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2009 to 2022 as research samples, which contain 28,565 firm-year observations and are analyzed by fixed effect regression. The results indicate that CEOs’ academic experience positively impacts innovation performance supported by resource-based theory. In addition, this study also reveals that CEO duality enhances the positive effect of CEOs’ academic experience on innovation performance supported by stewardship theory. This finding suggests that CEOs’ academic experience provides an internal and external driving resource for enhancing innovation performance. The combination of CEO and board chair will give more power to conducting innovation. Policymakers should prioritize academic recruitment, and grant decision-making power to academic CEOs to drive innovation in enterprises and research institutes.
Acharya, V. V., & Subramanian, K. V. (2009). Bankruptcy codes and innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), 4949–4988. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp019
Akram, F., & Haq, M. a. U. (2022). Integrating agency and resource dependence theories to examine the impact of corporate governance and innovation on firm performance. Cogent Business &
Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2152538
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 929–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.387
Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. (2015). Family firms in India: Family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 869–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9440-1
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurial access and absorption of knowledge spillovers: Strategic board and managerial composition for competitive advantage. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 155–166.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00161.x
Balasubramanian, N., & Lee, J. (2008). Firm age and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 1019–1047. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn028
Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2017). Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. B. (1990). The debate between traditional management theory and organizational economics: Substantive differences or intergroup conflict? The Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 382-393. https://doi.org/10.2307/258014
Bennat, T., & Sternberg, R. (2022). CEO characteristics and the Doing-Using-Interacting mode of innovation: A new upper echelons perspective. Industry and Innovation, 29(10), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2090319
Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160404
Briano-Turrent, G. D. C., Watkins-Fassler, K., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Reyes-Bastidas, C. (2023). Family firms and research and development investment: The moderator effect of the board composition. European Journal of Family Business, 13(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v13i1.16065
Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00013-2
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/258850
Chang, X., Fu, K., Low, A., & Zhang, W. (2015). Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(1), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.002
Chemmanur, T. J., Kong, L., Krishnan, K., & Yu, Q. (2018). Top management human capital, inventor mobility, and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(6), 2383–2422. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109018001497
Chen, J., & Lyu, R. W. (2017). Innovation in China: the state of art and future perspectives. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 69–103). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95123-9_4
Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., & Liang, X. (2015). How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127–1135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.002
Chen, Y., Podolski, E. J., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). Does managerial ability facilitate corporate innovative success? Journal of Empirical Finance, 34, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2015.08.002
Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700109
Datta, D. K., & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150706
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Dorcas, K. D., Celestin, B. N., & Yunfei, S. (2021). Entrepreneurs traits/characteristics and innovation performance of waste recycling start-ups in Ghana: An application of the upper echelons theory among SEED award winners. Sustainability, 13(11),5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115794
Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2006). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? Research Policy, 35(8), 1110–1121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003
Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Zellweger, T. M. (2011). Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
Ettlie, J. E., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1987). Firm size and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.420089
Fabrizio, K. R. (2006). The use of university research in firm innovation. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 134–160). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199290727.003.0007
Faleye, O. (2007). Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9028-3
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–
538. https://doi.org/10.5465/256485
Firth, M., Wong, S. M. L., & Yang, Y. (2012). The double-edged sword of CEO/chairperson duality in corporatized state-owned firms: Evidence from top management turnover in China. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 207–244.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9225-6
Fokuo, E. D., Boadu, F., Du, Y., & Xie, Y. (2023). Is the correlation between knowledge sharing and firm innovation performance contingent on network trust and hierarchical culture? Evidence from the Chinese high-tech sector. International Journal of Technology Management, 92(3), 206-228. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2023.10053924
Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2015). Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial Management, 44(3), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12069
Galbreath, J. (2005). Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9), 979–987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.008
Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001
Gumusluo?lu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00657.x
He, K., Chen, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Senior management’s academic experience and corporate green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120664
Hernandez, M. (2007). Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9440-2
Hu, A. G. Z., Zhang, P., & Zhao, L. (2017). China as number one? Evidence from China’s most recent patenting surge. Journal of Development Economics, 124, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.004
Huo, M., & Li, C. (2022). Impact of managerial power on enterprise innovation performance: The mediating roles of financing constraints and strategic orientation. Chinese Management Studies, 17(3), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2021-0249
Jiang, B., & Murphy, P. J. (2007). Do business school professors make good executive managers? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 29–50.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421237
Ju, X., Jiang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Innovation effects of academic executives: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 52(3), 104711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104711
Keay, A. (2017). Stewardship theory: Is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1292–1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0118
Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. (2013). CEO Duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013
Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002
Laosirihongthong, T., Prajogo, D. I., & Adebanjo, D. (2013). The relationships between firm’s strategy, resources and innovation performance: Resources-based view perspective. Production Planning & Control, 25(15), 1231–1246.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.819593
Lewellyn, K. B., & Fainshmidt, S. (2017). Effectiveness of CEO power bundles and discretion context: Unpacking the ‘Fuzziness’ of the CEO duality puzzle. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1603–1624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685364
Li, Q., & Shi, P. (2010). CEO characteristics, the independence of board of directors and the company innovation performance. 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2010.5660490
Ling, T. W., & Wahab, N. S. A. (2019). Components of book tax differences, corporate social responsibility and equity value. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1617024. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1617024
Liu, F., He, X., & Wang, T. (2023). In the name of the family: The effect of CEO clan culture background on firm internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113837
Loukil, N., Yousfi, O., & Cheikh, S. B. (2020). Innovation effort and CEO’s characteristics. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(05), 2050079.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500796
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x
McCann, P., & Oxley, L. (2012). Innovation, entrepreneurship, geography and growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00720.x
Mutlu, C. C., Van Essen, M., Peng, M. W., Saleh, S. F., & Duran, P. (2018). Corporate governance in China: A meta?analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 943–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12331
Peng, M. W., Zhang, S., & Li, X. (2007). CEO duality and firm performance during China’s institutional transitions. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00069.x
Peng, Y.-S., & Fang, C.-P. (2010). Acquisition experience, board characteristics, and acquisition behavior. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 502–509.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.009
Penrose. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34425026
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Competitiveness, C. O. (1999). The new challenge to America’s prosperity: Findings from the innovation index.
Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe. Research Policy, 46(7), 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.011
Reed, K. K., Srinivasan, N., & Doty, D. H. (2009). Adapting human and social capital to impact performance: Some empirical findings from the U.S. Personal banking sector. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(1), 36–57.
Rivard, S., Raymond, L., & Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.003
Rossi, M., Mardini, G. H., Kyriakidou, N., & Festa, G. (2023). The impact of corporate performance on innovation management: Empirical evidence from emerging Asian economies. Journal of International Management, 29(6), 101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2023.101091
Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I., & Keller, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x
Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.013
Shao, D., Zhao, S., Wang, S., & Jiang, H. (2020). Impact of CEOs’ academic work experience on firms’ innovation output and performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sustainability, 12(18), 7442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187442
Shen, H., Lan, F., Xiong, H., Lv, J., & Jian, J. (2020). Does top management Team’s academic experience promote corporate innovation? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 89, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.007
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2015, August 29). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Cujin Keji Chengguo Zhuanhua Fa. [Law of the People's Republic of China on Promoting the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements] Retrieved from www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/flfg/201512/t20151204_122621.html
State Council and CPC Central Committee. (2016, May 19). Guojia Chuangxin Qudong Fazhan Zhanlue Gangyao. [National Innovation-Driven Development Strategy Outline] Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5076961.htm
Sunder, J., Sunder, S. V., & Zhang, J. (2017). Pilot CEOs and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(1), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.002
Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1991374
Tosi, H. L., Brownlee, A. L., Silva, P., & Katz, J. P. (2003). An empirical exploration of decision?making under agency controls and stewardship structure. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2053–2071. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00411.x
Wang, L., Su, Z., Fung, H.-G., Jin, H., & Xiao, Z. (2021). Do CEOs with academic experience add value to firms? Evidence on bank loans from Chinese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101534
Wang, Q., Pei, X., & Liang, H. (2022). Founder CEO, CEO characteristics, and firm innovation efficiency: An empirical study of China’s GEM-Listed companies. Sustainability, 14(14), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148250
Wei, L.-Q., & Ling, Y. (2015). CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.010
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Wijethilake, C., & Ekanayake, A. (2019). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0321
Xu, P., & Bai, G. (2019). Board governance, sustainable innovation capability and corporate expansion: Empirical data from private listed companies in China. Sustainability, 11(13), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133529
Yang, D., Wang, A. X., Zhou, K. Z., & Jiang, W. (2018). Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: A managerial cognition perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3830-5
Yang, Q., & Xiang, H. (2023). The influence of institutional investor shareholding on the innovation level of listed companies. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-1-2023.2330259
Yao, S., & Zhang, X. (2024). Era connotation, strategic value and realization path of new quality productivity. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 30(1), 1-18.
Yu, M. (2022). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12522
Yu, W., Hong, J., Wu, Y., & Zhao, D. (2013). Emerging geography of creativity and labor productivity effects in China. China & World Economy, 21(5), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2013.12040.x
Yuan, R., & Wen, W. (2018). Managerial foreign experience and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 752–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.015
Zhang, F., Wei, L., Yang, J., & Zhu, L. (2018). Roles of relationships between large shareholders and managers in radical innovation: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12376
Zhang, N. Q., & Liu, N. X. (2021). An empirical study on CEO’s academic experience and financing Constraints—Taking Shanghai and Shenzhen A-Share listed companies as samples. Management Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2021.04.003
Zhu, C., Xiao, Y., & Wang, R. (2023). Behavioral influences on the relationship between firms’ aspiration performance gap and innovation input: The moderating role of executives’ vocational socialization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(3), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12665
(Xie et al., 2024)
Xie, T., Lin, H., & Lok, C.-L. (2024). CEOs’ Academic Experience and Innovation Performance: Moderating Effect of CEO Duality. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 14(2), 478–495.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode