ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
Effective ESG disclosure is becoming increasingly important in corporate governance as stakeholders demand greater corporate sustainability. As the world's second-largest economy and a major emerging market, China exhibits unique state-owned attributes and concentrated ownership in corporate governance, providing a distinctive research perspective for studying the relationship between ownership structure and ESG disclosure. Recently, China's mixed ownership reform has brought new challenges to corporate governance, and provided an important opportunity to promote ESG disclosure. Therefore, this study examines how ownership concentration, and equity checks and balances affect ESG disclosure in China. Using a fixed-effects model, we conduct an empirical analysis of data from 1,008 companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2017 and 2022, evaluating the relationship between ownership structure and ESG disclosure levels. The results indicate that higher ownership concentration has a significant negative impact on ESG disclosure, as controlling shareholders may prioritize short-term financial returns at the expense of broader ESG goals. In contrast, equity checks and balances have a significant positive impact on ESG disclosure, indicating greater counterbalance power among shareholders can promote higher transparency and accountability in ESG reporting. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how ownership structures affect ESG disclosure in the Chinese context, offering policy insights for improving corporate governance practices. Policymakers and corporate practitioners can draw on these findings to promote stronger governance frameworks that enhance ESG transparency and corporate sustainability. Future research can further explore the global dynamics of ESG disclosure under different ownership structures by comparing emerging markets (concentrated ownership) with developed markets (dispersed ownership), to reveal the impact of corporate governance models on ESG transparency in different market contexts.
Abdifatah, A. H., & Nazli, A. M. G. (2013). The quality and determinants of voluntary disclosures in annual reports of Shari’ah compliant companies in Malaysia. Humanomics, 29(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661311299303
Akben-Selcuk, E. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey. Sustainability, 11(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133643
Alkayed, H., & Omar, B. F. (2022). Determinants of the extent and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in the industrial and services sectors: The case of Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(5), 1206–1245. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2021-0133
Allam, B. S. (2018). The impact of board characteristics and ownership identity on agency costs and firm performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(6), 1147–1176. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2016-0184
Alnabsha, A., Abdou, H. A., Ntim, C. G., & Elamer, A. A. (2018). Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2016-0001
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2019). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
Arif, M., Gan, C., & Nadeem, M. (2021). Regulating non-financial reporting: Evidence from European firms’ environmental, social and governance disclosures and earnings risk. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(3), 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1086
Assidi, S. (2020). The Effect of Voluntary Disclosures and Corporate Governance on Firm Value: A study of listed firms in France. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00090-1
Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Marsat, S., & Sijamic Wahid, A. (2021). How do firms achieve corporate social performance? An integrated perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(3), 1078–1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2107
Bloomberg. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Scores Methodology and Field Information. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/products/data/enterprise-catalog/esg/#overview
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK Companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7–8), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Crisóstomo, V. L., Brandão, I. de F., & López-Iturriaga, F. J. (2020). Large shareholders’ power and the quality of corporate governance: An analysis of Brazilian firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101076
Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452
Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1574-1
Ducassy, I., & Guyot, A. (2017). Complex ownership structures, corporate governance and firm performance: The French context. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.019
Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Wang, Y. (2016). Antecedents of voluntary corporate governance disclosure: A post-2007/08 financial crisis evidence from the influential UK Combined Code. Corporate Governance, 16(3), 507–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2016-0006
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Foroughi M., & Fooladi M. (2011). Corporate Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Listed Firms in Iran (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2259555). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2259555
Fu, C., Wu, W., & Li, W. (2020). Internal Control and Intellectual Capital Information Disclosure-Empirical Evidence from China s High-tech Listed Companies. Luojia Management Review, 4, 71–89.
García-Sánchez, I.-M., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2018). How do Independent Directors Behave with Respect to Sustainability Disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1481
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Hair, J. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Faculty and Research Publications. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/2925
Hasan, A., Aly, D., & Hussainey, K. (2022). Corporate governance and financial reporting quality: A comparative study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0298
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
He, C., Soh, W. N., Ong, T. S., Lau, W. T., & Zhong, B. (2022). Analysis of Equity Disputes in Listed Companies With Dispersed Ownership Structure and Protection of Small and Medium Shareholders’ Interests. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 857585.
He, F., Du, H., & Yu, B. (2022). Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102201
Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. de. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jizi, M. (2017). The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943
Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. (2022). ESG in the boardroom: Evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00072-2
Kamran, M., Djajadikerta, H. G., Mat Roni, S., Xiang, E., & Butt, P. (2022). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility in an international setting. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2021-0140
Kao, M.-F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2018). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144
Kusnadi, Y., Leong, K. S., Suwardy, T., & Wang, J. (2016). Audit Committees and Financial Reporting Quality in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2679-0
Lepore, L., Pisano, S., Di Vaio, A., & Alvino, F. (2018). The myth of the “good governance code”: An analysis of the relationship between ownership structure and the comply-or-explain disclosure. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(5), 809–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0197
Li, H., Wang, Z., & Deng, X. (2008). Ownership, independent directors, agency costs and financial distress: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(5), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810913287
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J. A., & Pudschedl, P. C. (2024). Institutional Investors and ESG Preferences. An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12583
Lozano, M. B., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2022). Do emerging and developed countries differ in terms of sustainable performance? Analysis of board, ownership and country-level factors. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101688
Ma, A. K. F., & Chen, Y. (2023). Board attributes, ownership structure, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from A-share listed technological companies in China. Society and Business Review, 19(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-08-2022-0225
Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.002
Nekhili, M., Boukadhaba, A., & Nagati, H. (2021). The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(2), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12345
Onoja, A., & Agada, G. O. (2015). Voluntary Risk Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports: An Empirical Review. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(17), 1–8.
Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020). The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2238–2250. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2498
Rashid, A. (2016). Managerial Ownership and Agency Cost: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2570-z
Ren, L. (2022). A review of studies on the impact of multiple major shareholders on corporate voluntary information disclosure. Market Modernization, 2, 62–64.
Sáenz González, J., & García-Meca, E. (2014). Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings Management in Latin American Markets? Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1700-8
Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, 28(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2011.12.001
Sarhan, A. A., & Al-Najjar, B. (2023). The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(4), 4532–4556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2663
Sheng, L., Sun, W., & Feng, Y. (2019). Research on the Influence of Corporate Governance Structure on the Quality of Accounting Information. Frontiers of International Accounting, 08, 73. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIA.2019.83011
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Toerien, F., Breedt, C., & de, J. P. G. (2023). Does board gender diversity improve environmental, social and governance disclosure? Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 3646. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3646
Tran, M., Beddewela, E., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Governance and sustainability in Southeast Asia. Accounting Research Journal, 34(6), 516–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2019-0095
Wang, L., Qi, J., & Zhuang, H. (2023). Monitoring or Collusion? Multiple Large Shareholders and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103673
Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied Linear Regression (Vol. 528). John Wiley & Sons.
Wu, S., Li, X., Du, X., & Li, Z. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114507
Yasser, Q. R., Mamun, A. A., & Hook, M. (2017). The impact of ownership structure on financial reporting quality in the east. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2015-0894
Yilmaz, M. K., Aksoy, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Moderating role of corporate governance and ownership structure on the relationship of corporate sustainability performance and dividend policy. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2100311
Zaid, M. A. A., Abuhijleh, S. T. F., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2020). Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1888
Teng, J., Saidin, S. F., Lau, Y. W., & Li, M. (2024). The Effect of Ownership Structure on ESG Disclosure in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 14(3), 397–415.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode